Member Reviews

Does A Lot of Interesting Things, Interestingly

First off, I didn't see the horror, scary, creepy angle here. These are witty, mischievous, and pretend-dark retellings of fairy tales and other popular cultural artifacts, but they struck me as funny, arch, coy, playful, and argumentative deconstructions and writing exercises, not actual "tales of horror". That's fine; indeed, that's great. But I wouldn't put this work in the same category or genre as all of those books that "reimagine" or "modernize" or update Grimm style tales, or put them in high school or make them into middle grade fantasy adventures. This uses Grimm and other well known tales, (including the Bible), to go to other more interesting places.

There is a lot of gender bending, pronoun play, feminist critique, cultural role playing, and post-Barthelme post-postmodern playing around, and it's all done with a good deal of style, wit, and, (if you'll excuse the phrase), verve. The narrator, who sometimes makes herself known through asides and digressions, is puckish and playful. Indeed, you could completely ignore the plot or structure of any of the stories and just get a kick out of the playful and transgressive writing - throwaway lines, bits of dialogue, sly asides, and withering gimlet eyed assessments.

Some of the tales are stripped down and streamlined in order to racket and speed to their conclusions. Others are pumped up and drawn out, I guess in order to play with different structural and story-telling conventions. There are deadpan monologues, bantering lead characters, occasional crowd scenes, and a few voice-overs, maybe to make a point, and maybe just as a form of writerly showing off. Again, that's fine because this is a writer who has earned the right to show off a bit.

As would any reader, I had a few favorites. I liked the pencil necked bureaucratic and fussy angel who just wanted to clear up a few things from Genesis. Even though I resisted where it was obviously going, I dug the Velveteen Rabbit. Princesses figure heavily in most of the stories, and Grimm coupled with girrrl power is always a treat. I may have found the one mermaid I didn't want to send back to the watery deep. And the absence of a "no" doesn't mean "yes".

Bottom line? These stories are a hoot; you'll be in the hands of a sharp, sharp witted, sharp humored writer with an eye for the gender jugular. A nice find.

(Please note that I received a free advance ecopy of this book without a review requirement, or any influence regarding review content should I choose to post a review. Apart from that I have no connection at all to either the author or the publisher of this book.)

Was this review helpful?

What a great collection of stories. I definitely a fan of Ortberg's work now.

Was this review helpful?

Delightfully bloody, dark, and feminist reworkings of familiar stories. And reading anything from Mallory Ortberg is such a treat. Recommended for all of the lightly misandrist fairy tale enthusiasts.

Was this review helpful?

Dark horror fairytale retellings??? SIGN ME UP!!!!! I was thrilled when netgally approved me for this... My favorites were The daughter cells, the rabbit, and some of us have been threatening our friend Mr. Toad. These are nightmare inducing gems. My least favorite was the thankless child. I didn't get it and the pronoun thing just pissed me off. Overall I would definitely recommend this and I will be buying my own copy when it comes out.

Was this review helpful?

This story collection was pretty delightful. There's some feminist overtones of classic heroines taking charge of their own stories. There's some gaslighting going on in some pretty cruel ways and them some things that are truly terrifying. If anyone likes retold fairy tales or classic stories this will be enjoyable.

Was this review helpful?

This was a very cool book. The imagery that Ortberg uses and the flipping of the usual narrative scripts within fairy tales was awesome and well thought out. There were tons of lines that she wrote that I highlighted and chortled at because they were just so true to life, despite being set in a fairy tale world. Definitely would recommend this book to anyone who likes the grimmer side of fairy tales.

Was this review helpful?

I have been a fan of Mallory Ortberg’s writing since her early days at The Toast, so I was over the moon to be able to get my grubby hands on an advanced copy of her newest, The Merry Spinster.

This collection of fairytale, folklore, and bible re-tellings is both ingenious and terrifying. With a feminist and queer spin (no pun intended) to each story, Ortberg’s writing brings an unexpected and needed new life to them. You do not need a perfect memory of the original stories to enjoy them though, they are all their own unique short and enjoyable stories that are easily digestible.

I love Ortberg’s weirdness and these strange worlds she has created. They are not for everyone, but if you are willing to take a chance (and stomach some of the complicated wording or plot), it is totally worth it.

Was this review helpful?

This was a fun book to read, it you like to read unusual and twisted stories. Ortenburg doesn't retell familiar fairy tales; she takes the familiar and gives it her own unique spin using humor, integrating bits and pieces of other literature such as the Bible and folktales, Female characters play strong roles in her tales; no damsels in distress here.
On the other hand, it took me awhile to finish this book because I would put it down and walk away, not in any rush to pick it back up. Some of the stories grabbed my attention, while others left me not really caring one way or the other what happened.
Overall, this book, for me, rates between 3 and 4 stars.
Overall, though, I'm glad I read it, even if it did take me awhile. I like the unusual and twisted telling of these tales; I think the ones that gave me the most difficulty involved stories I hadn't ever read. At the end of the book, Ortenburg includes a list of the original works she based her stories on and the list did include tales I hadn't read before.

Was this review helpful?

I enjoyed this modern, edgy and warped (and I mean that in all the best ways) take on traditional fairy tales. I’m always game for updated retellings and this collection did not disappoint.

Was this review helpful?

Such a smart and funny book—a completely original take on some of our oldest and (strangely) cherished stories. Ortberg is a masterful storyteller and maker (re-maker?) of language. Highly recommended.

Was this review helpful?

If I ever have children/nieces/nephews/unfortunate babysitting victims, I'm reading them these. Dark, sharp, and insightful, Mallory Ortberg takes familiar tales and unravels them, repurposing the yarn into something twisted, dark, unrecognizable, and surprisingly comfortable in your brain-parts. These stories are old friends whose dark sides you never knew, but instead of being repulsed by them... you realize you love them more than ever. I received this book from NetGalley for an honest review. I loved it.

Was this review helpful?

I am a huge fan of a retelling. So, seeing this collection of retellings of fairy tales, folk tales and other well-known/traditional stories available for request on NetGalley had me super interested. Needless to say, I was psyched when I got chosen and sent the ARC. I was a little nervous starting to read, because “everyday horror” could mean a lot of things (I totally overlooked that subtitle when originally requesting, as the rest of the description jumped at me first) and I am a giant baby when it comes to scary stories. But these are the perfect type of creepy for me: twisted and dark, instead of full on scary. And I got to read them right in time for Halloween!

Here are some short thoughts on each of the stories:

The Daughter Cells: The way the differences in perspective (between the original Little Mermaid and this retelling) are captured is on point. In general, this was an awesomely gory story to start the collection with.

The Thankless Child: The gender fluidity in the Cinderella retelling was really interesting and I thought that was a fascinating new take. And the uncomfortable focus of the fairy godmother on Paul (our Cinderella character) definitely made this tale a little horrific to read. However, beyond that I am not sure that understood the religious undertones (that were somehow related to salt?) or what the ending meant.

Fear Not: An Incident Log: The angel voice/monologue was a creative point of view. There was definitely a dark humor in carrying out God’s orders as a sort of mundane check the boxes/HR sort of job position. Very original and probably my favorite use of religion in any of the stories.

The Six Boy-Coffins: With details from a couple well known fairy tales (even if you cannot name them, you’ll recognize the elements, like nettle shirts and brothers turned into swans), this was probably my favorite story of the collection! This is a wonderfully horrifying take on the normal “handsome prince marries fair maiden” fairy tale trope, with a lovely feminist commentary on the lack of a no not meaning a yes. And the [well-deserved] lady revenge at the end was awesome! Love this quote: “She was beginning to learn the danger of silence, and that someone who wishes to hear a yes will not go out of his way to listen for a yes.”

The Rabbit: This one likely scared me the most. A sociopathic version of the Velveteen Rabbit, with a very succubus take on what being “Real” in the eyes of a child means. It felt a little like I was reading a stuffed animal version of a pathological killer storyline on a crime show. Yikes! But it was very creative, both in that I’ve never seen this story retold anywhere before, and to be fair it’s not an unreasonable (if still totally dark) reimagining of the original.

The Merry Spinster: The titular story. And sadly not my favorite considering it being based on my favorite ever, Beauty and the Beast. It started out super promising, but by the end I was really confused by the progression of the relationship between Beauty and the “Beast” and the ending. So when I finished I was pretty unsatisfied. However, this quote is pretty much my life: “Instead, she reads books, which did her no good whatever. She was twenty-eight and mostly useless.”

The Wedding Party: The dialogue between the main characters in this story was superb. It was witty, and authentic and creative and I loved it. I also thought the couple unsettling moments between them were well written examples of “everyday” horror. Unfortunately, the rest of the story, like the plot, made very little sense to me. I mean I understood what was happening on the surface, but I don’t think I recognized any of the original tales they were retellings of, which meant I wasn’t getting anything deeper from the story.

Some of Us Had Been Threatening Our Friend Mr. Toad: Whoa. What a sick and twisted story about messing with someone’s head. So much manipulation at the hands of supposed friends – the mind games and intimidation in this story were definitely a bit terrifying.

Cast Your Bread Upon the Waters: Probably my second favorite story overall. This was a cool take on the many siren/mermaid/selkie myths. Really entertaining, with a great gory ending and a big dash of over-righteous father (I mean really, you have to be pretty zealous to do what he did to his own son…yeesh).

The Frog’s Princess: This one definitely had some humor too, like an exaggerated warning story to children about making promises they don’t intend to keep. I also feel like there was a chance something deeper was going on, some kind of societal commentary on the importance we place on beauty (“Beauty is never private.”), but I think exactly what that was went over my head. Regardless, this was a lighthearted sort of gross.

Good Fences Make Good Neighbors: This was a strange amalgamation of a Grimm fairy tale and Frog and Toad. Both of which I like. But the way they are combined here is done very creepily – another really “horrifying in a depressing way” story of manipulation by someone who is supposed to be a friend. It’s well done though and a good way to close the collection.

Finally, a few of my thoughts on the collection as a whole. As I already mentioned, the “everyday horror” was the perfect amount for me: off-putting, but not enough to keep me awake at night. There were religious undertones in a number of the stories and some I enjoyed, but I felt like it happened too often for my enjoyment (keep in mind that I am super atheist and take that with a grain of salt). On the other hand, there were lots of real life phrases dropped in pretty much all the stories, everything from “financial portfolio” to “metal alloys” to “oil-modified urethane finish” and I thought that the jarring juxtaposition of that language with the fairy tale tone used throughout was a great touch. It gave a different sort of spin on the idea of “everyday horror.” One other thing I noticed was that many of the stories had some serious pronoun fluidity and confusion, which I am generally be ok with, but I felt like I couldn’t ever figure out why, what it added to the stories or what message it was supposed to be sending, so I’m not sure how I feel about it in these cases (as far as actually/truly reviewing it). Unless the goal was to just normalize non-traditional pronoun use....in that case - hell yea! Overall, an entertaining collection of super weird retellings and stories inspired from popular tales!

Thanks to NetGalley and that publisher, Henry Holt & Co, for sending me an ARC of this book in exchange for an honest review.

Was this review helpful?

If you're already a fan of Mallory Ortberg, this book delivers everything you could possibly want. If you're not already a Mallory fan, I urge you to get on board as soon as possible. I only wish this was getting released in time for Christmas this year!

Was this review helpful?

A collection of “retold fairy tales” – or so says the blurb, but I think I’d describe it as a collection of short stories that, while they certainly play with fairy tale motifs and plots, aren’t quite producing new fairy tales, no more than The Bloody Chamber or Into the Woods are fairy tales. Besides, Ortberg takes her inspiration from sources beyond traditional folklore: here we have Shakespeare, the Bible, The Wind in the Willows, and Frog and Toad are friends, among others.

I’m a huge fan of Ortberg, which is the main reason I wanted to read this collection as soon as I knew it existed (though I am also a fan of fairy tale retellings, so that aspect didn’t hurt), but I mainly think of her as a comedian. Though she can be very funny, that sense of humor isn't much evident in this book. These stories are dark, casting a cynical eye over society and human relationships, interspersed with some genuinely bone-chilling moments.

My favorite stories were 'The Daughter Cells', a take on Hans Christian Andersen’s Little Mermaid from the point of view of the mermaid. I mean, I suppose the original was from the point of the view of the mermaid as well, but this is a story where the whole worldview is oriented to creatures that live in the ocean, and to them to breathe dry air or be unable to regenerate limbs or live behind doors are just odd cultural quirks that must be tolerated in those poor humans. Another favorite was 'The Rabbit', in which the Velveteen Rabbit does not become Real through love of a child, but through stealing the child’s life-force. It’s creepy and sociopathic and I just loved it.

On the other hand, I really wanted to like 'The Thankless Child', a mix of King Lear and Cinderella (and how have I never noticed those parallels before? The three daughters, the youngest one good but oppressed, the missing mother). Parts of it are wonderful, particularly the insistent demands of the godmother for the youngest child to love her and only her – that was absolutely chilling in an understated way. There’s an interesting take on gender roles here as well, with “husband” and “wife” being placements one decides on after marrying, more job titles than gender roles. On the other hand, I’m not exactly sure what happened at the end, in that way of literary fiction that is so concerned with being subtle it crosses the line into incomprehensible. It’s not the only story with a bit of that, but this was the piece that suffered the worst.

I did enjoy this collection overall, even if it wasn’t quite what I expected. For a sample of Ortberg's writing in a similar vein, check out <a href="http://the-toast.net/2015/04/07/childrens-stories-made-horrific-thousandfurs/">this retelling of Donkeyskin</a> by her. If you like that, you’re sure to like this book as well.

https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/2173146338

Was this review helpful?

*received via NetGalley

I'm a sucker for fairy tale adaptations, and being a fan of The Toast I was so excited to read this. The stories are dark and strange, some adaptations of one fairy tale and others a mix of a few. I appreciated that a list of which stories were drawn from for each piece in the book is provided at the end. Fans of Mallory's and fans of dark fairy tales will love this.

Was this review helpful?

Okay. So you know how every time a Disney animated movie is released, there's all That One Guy who's really into himself who says some boring supercilious bullcrap like, "I prefer the ORIGINAL; it's MUCH DARKER and the ending is FAR from HAPPY."

This is the kind of person who SAYS he's read Hunter S. Thompson when he really read a Wikipedia synopsis of Thompson's plots; also he talks like Holden Caulfield whenever anybody tries to discuss politics around him.

I personally myself have read fairy tale source material, please and thank you, but I'm not going to deny someone else their pleasure at talking animals or whatever. Plus I enjoy the darker versions of these fairy tales because of who I am as a person, not because I like making other people feel small and simple.

The point I'm trying to make is this: Mallory Ortberg's collection of fairy tale retellings is way darker than anything you (or That One Guy) ever read in, like, your sociology text. They're the kind of dark you'd like if maybe Struwwelpeter or the Krampus make you laugh; that is to say, they're inappropriate for children, but adults with very VERY twisted senses of humor will enjoy them.

Ortberg considerably includes a list of the stories' inspirations. While I recognized some, she's mixed them with elements of other fairy tales, folk tales, and legends, so that all of the details weren't always recognizable.

That One Guy would NOT like this book, because it will be too scary and feminist for him. Your weirdest friend, though? Yeah, she'll love it.

Was this review helpful?