Member Reviews

Nancy Pearcey recognizes the common question at the heart of our most controversial public ethics conversations: What is our body for? A whole host of timely topics can be traced back to the same philosophical assumption that our bodies are something we simply have instead of our bodies defining who we are.

I don't know of any other public thinker whose thesis better explains what is at stake when we separate the human being into two parts: the "upper story" which houses our emotional and thought lives, and the "lower story" which contains our physical selves. She's used this thesis to make sense of contemporary art in Saving Leonardo: A Call to Resist the Secular Assault on Mind, Morals, and Meaning and to explain how recent history has created our contemporary assumptions about truth in Total Truth: Liberating Christianity from its Cultural Captivity.

Pearcey explains the phenomena of personhood theory--the theory that we are not necessarily persons simply by virtue of being alive, but that we achieve personhood through subjective achievements which vary widely depending on who is determining personhood status. By making personhood a special status, people can justify infanticide (abortion), suicide (euthanasia), and can divorce physical sex from love or physical identity from felt identity.

When we limit the authority of the body, we increase the authority of our own choices. When we make personhood a status, we increase the power of those who get to determine who achieves that status. As Pearcey says, "When the concept of personhood is detached from biology, it becomes arbitrary, with no objective criteria. Eventually, the definition of a person will be enforced by whichever group has the most power" (84).

Because she refuses to shy away from even the most sensitive of political controversies, there were a few times when I cringed at Pearcey's politics because they seemed too narrow, but her celebration of the Christian worldview is anything but narrow. I don't know of anyone else who explains our worldview as perceptively. In every one of her books (Love Thy Body included), Pearcey shows how every other worldview reduces human beings to less than they are. To Pearcey, a human being is always more than the sum of his or her parts, more than just Descartes' "ghost in a machine" but a glorious whole. Our whole selves are designed by the creator, and every aspect of our mind, body, and soul reflects His purpose.

When we see human beings as glorious wholes, "the pressure is off to prove our worth or persuade people that our lives have value" (93). But when we have inherent value, we have to stop excusing misuses of the body.

Pearcey is asking the right questions. I agree that "our actions can imply ideas that we have not clearly thought through" and that, as a culture, we often make choices about what is best for individuals without thinking through the worldview that these ideas imply (52). I hate to get political, but I love to get philosophical. I hope people who agree with Pearcey will be encouraged by the logical, compassionate foundations of our worldview. I hope people who disagree with Pearcey will read this book and examine the implications of embracing personhood theory. I hope this is a book that spurs a thousand lively discussions.

Was this review helpful?

It's interesting to consider, given the now nearly three years since this book's release, how little influence it has had on the conversation of the body and the implications of the transgender conversation outside of its own circles. It's perhaps worth consulting as an irenic approach to begin addressing the issues, but not one that seems to have had any critical impact.

Was this review helpful?

If you're wondering what's happening to the very heart of humanity in the world's cultural narrative, this book puts its finger square on the problem: we are being separated from ourselves. This book is for all of those who are desperately clinging to something essential that the world refuses to recognize any longer, something that makes us powerfully who we are.

Yes, it's a book about sexuality, among other things, but it's really a book about stories - the stories we tell ourselves, the stories we're told, the stories God is telling through us, the stories God has told since the beginning of time. Yes, it's a book about the Christian narrative that restores wholeness and holiness to who we are by recognizing how central our physical existence is to our intended design. But you don't have to be a Christian to get something from this book. You don't have to agree with Nancy's argument for Christian morality/ethics as a "better" story to be struck by how plainly she reveals the contradictions and inconsistencies in the dominant cultural worldview. In other words, you don't have to see eye-to-eye with her on what works to understand what's not working about the story our society is trying to tell. Anyone who approaches this book with honest curiosity will be forced to reconsider what he or she has bought into and how it is shaping not only our love, but our very lives.

In a lot of places, the writing in this book is very repetitive, which is often a distraction to some of the good points that Nancy is trying to make. It can sometimes give the appearance of weakening the argument by having this go-to language that is gone to over and over and over again, sometimes even on consecutive pages, but don't let the writing distract you. This is no weak argument. It's the very core of what we're talking about right now, every day, what we're being bombarded by in our headlines and our politics. It's the very core of who we are, which we are in danger of losing in the name of "tolerance" and "progress." This timely book helps those of us who are holding on and holding out, refusing to let go or give in.

Was this review helpful?

Never in my life have I read a more relevant book for today's Christians than this one! It was so full of logical insights that it took me more than three weeks to read it, and I usually finish any book in less than a week. But I had to digest what I was reading, and I'm glad I did because this book was well worth it.

Nancy Pearcey hits all the hot-button issues of today - abortion, transgenderism, homosexuality, sexual promiscuity and euthanasia. She cites those on the left with their "be true to yourself" mentality and shows logically and thoroughly the dangers of each belief and how these beliefs will eventually lead to the downfall of true freedom for society.

This book needs to be in the hands of every Pastor, Youth Leader and Seminary student. It needs to be part of the curriculum in Christian schools as it will educate and prepare our children to face these issues with a firm foundation of Scripture and the reason why secularists are wrong.

In the end, Pearcey clearly shows how God's plan is ultimately the most humane and loving plan for humanity.

Was this review helpful?

Whenever I’m on the set of a movie or TV show, I often meet people who are homosexual. As soon as I mention that I’m a pastor, I could feel the atmosphere get cold. They’ve been judged before. By pastors, churches…Christians. It takes a few minutes for them to see that I’m not there to judge them. They see that I’m quite friendly, and even as a pastor, they say that I’m like “a normal person.” Imagine that.

​But even with all the laughter and friendliness, when I invite them to my church, there’s a tangible hesitation. They feel unwelcome. And it’s not because ​of any anti-homosexual propaganda, media – what Christians have said. It’s what Christians have not said. Yes, there’s plenty of gay-bashing Christians in the media, some of them crazy. They know it’s part hype. But there’s usually silence from the majority of Christians and churches. There’s no welcoming, no embrace, the topic is avoided altogether. Among their Christian “friends,” there’s no condemnation, but neither is there acceptance. It’s like they’re walking on egg shells, so just avoid that path of discussion. Pretend it’s not an issue and ignore the elephant in the room. That leads to superficial conversations and superficial relationships.

No wonder they don’t want to come to church.

So how should Christians and churches respond? How do we act around our homosexual friends and neighbors? And what do we talk about? And foundationally, what do you think about the issue, Biblically? Social commentary and logical arguments abound on the internet, some wrapped in religious clothes, but where does your Biblical understand lead you in light of all the scientific and social information about homosexuality and transgenderism (including genderqueer, pangender, gender fluid, etc)?

In her new book, Love Thy Body, Nancy Pearcey shows us a well-balanced description of the issue and how to approach it Biblically and socially. Pearcey is a highly intelligent philosopher, well read in secular and theological literature, and is a good writer.

In chapter 1, Pearcey makes it clear that all these issues pertaining to sexuality is really a war of worldviews. What is the human body? Is there a sense of self regardless of the body? She first uses Abortion as an example to discuss the philosophy of worldviews, and how they affect everything we talk about.

In all my theological studies, I have never studied the theology of the body. It was a given, a non-issue. Well, due to a critical misunderstanding of the body, as God’s creation, Christians have no theological response to the modern issues of sexuality, e.g. Homosexuality, Transgender. I expected to read mostly social commentary, but this book is theologically and biblically based, because both deal with worldviews, which is the very foundation of the author’s points.

Biologically speaking, the male human body is designed to be in union with the female body. But the postmodern society is asking, “Why should my body direct my psychological identity?” There is a disconnect. “When a person senses a dissonance between mind and body…the body is dismissed as irrelevant.”

Today’s thinking of gender and sexual identity has evolved from even 10 years ago. Sexuality and Genderism is not based in science or even a scientific search. 10 years ago, people were looking for a gene that influences homosexuality in the DNA, or a gender identity influenced by chemistry in the brain. Now, the leaders of the movement proclaim that is a moot point. Regardless of my male physical body or what goes on in my brain, I could declare my preference to be considered a female. I don’t have to undergo a sex change operation, nor do I have to alter my physical appearance to look female (like the old drag queen stereotype). Who I am in the inside has nothing to do with biology.

When factual science, based on biology and chemistry (as opposed to social science), is taken out of the equation, gender and sexual preference is all subjective. Employers must recognize these preferences or face heavy fines, all without any proof of surgery or hormone treatment. With the rise of postmodernism, physical traits or biology takes a back seat to the inner feelings. These feelings are not innate since birth, unchangeable. They are in constant flux, even among the leaders of the movement. It’s not about being recognized as queer or homosexual or pangender by the mainstream. It’s about not having to check a box - male, female, or trans. They don’t want to be put in a box. I can be male today but female tomorrow.

Then how are these feelings formed? Some of them seem quite unchangeable. Pearcey says we must take “individual responsibility for our identity,” and we interpret our identity by “sifting through” our cultural grids, through the norms therein. Is it weird for a little boy to be gentle, sensitive, and emotional (instead of shouting with army toys)? Does this indicate he may be transgender or homosexual? No! Boys can be sensitive, just like girls can be take-charge, assertive, and adventurous. Instead of letting gender stereotypes play out, Christians must speak out against this subversive type of meta-bullying. The “speaking out” isn’t against this little girl who is questioning herself why she doesn’t play with dolls like all the other girls. It’s against society and the laws that want to question what a “male” or “female” is. Identity is based on biology, not social culture. When this cultural grid better reflects reality, people will have a healthier barometer by which to discover their identity. It should be socially acceptable for a girl to like “manly” things and want to fight like a soldier. She’s not “in the wrong body.” Nor is she supposed to “act like a girl” because of her biology. These gender stereotypes end up confusing people when they think there’s another option: they’re “in the wrong body.”

The Bible is against the old Gnostic teaching that the physical body is not part of the authentic self. “Male” and “female” are not mere social constructs. They are rooted in biology and creation. There’s a need for Christians to speak up and present the Biblical worldview, not for moral condemnation, but rather to present “a more appealing, more life-affirming worldview,” because they care about people. She continues, “holding up a moral ideal for sexuality has nothing to do with self-righteousness, [but] it stems from the conviction that certain acts are healthier and more fulfilling because they are in line with the way God created humanity.”

Instead of speaking out against male-bodied transgenders who go into womens’ shower rooms at the gym, Christians must show compassion to those who are struggling with their sense of self. They “despise their own bodies and reject their biological identity.”

I encourage everyone to read this new book by Pearcey. It really tackles all the good arguments raised by these issues of sexuality. In addition, not just on an intellectual level, her motive stems from the desire to build strong relationships with the real people struggling with these deeply personal issues. Far from a stance of religious condemnation, this book is a call to reach out and actively help.

Was this review helpful?