In light of the scandals of the church and the abuse and manipulation of members of various churches by those who were entrusted with its leadership, books like this have really gained significance. We need to be able to critically examine the words that Jesus taught us and take from them what we feel helps us lead a better, for fruitful, more forgiving life for ourselves. The bible has been misinterpreted for centuries by those who chose to do so for their own gain. Issues of race were perpetrated and maintained by the church for way too long. Thankfully that is now visible and places of worship are becoming more transparent. God created us all equal, but as Wilson-Hartgrove revealed, that equality was not always enacted and displayed in those houses built in which we worship that God. It resonates further today with the racist views of the US presidents and his proclamations relating to the necessity for a wall to keep the migrants out. If his ridiculous behaviour persists those in the south will gladly pay for that wall to keep him and his followers locked inside their racist states. The author here provides plenty of food for thought. It is reflective, current and very accurate at times. I recommend this read.

RECONSTRUCTING THE GOSPEL Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove

Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove gives voice to a quandary that’s existed in the minds and hearts of many white children growing up in the faiths of their fathers and mothers. While sitting in hard or cushion pews their little legs, not reaching the floor, swing as they hear the sermons they may not understand, and listen to everyone around singing the familiar hymns.
Somewhere in their young hearts and minds, as they assess the world from a child’s point of observation, they wonder why the people taught them to sing “red and yellow, black and white, they are precious in His sight, Jesus loves the little children of the world,” exhibit a very different behavior outside of church.
The author, raised in the church and in the South, came to recognize the gospel his Christianity proclaimed earnestly also perpetuated racial injustice in Jesus’ name. It should be noted that although the American South gets the worst press for this behavior, the fault doesn’t end there.
Wilson-Hartgrove could not deny what he witnessed, and fortunately his heart would not. The Jesus of the reconstructed gospel still finds us worthy of saving, and will direct us in healing the land and repairing the breach.

Jonathon Wilson Hartgrove is brilliant and has his finger on the pulse of our culture. His book paints an accurate picture of where we are for anyone who is interested in social justice and the church.

I enjoyed the stories shared in the book and they left me feeling hopeful and encouraged. I recommend this book to anyone who cares about social justice and anyone wrestling with the state of the church.

The publisher provided an ARC through Netgalley. I have voluntarily decided to read and review, giving my personal opinions and thoughts.

It's not often that I'll say I hate a book. But Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove's Reconstructing the Gospel: Finding Freedom from Slaveholder Religion comes close.



Let me back up. One of the great miracles of the Christian faith is that through 2000 years of human interpretations, cultural layering, power plays, and prideful squabbles, Christianity has survived. Each new generation in each new geographical location has the opportunity to experience the transforming power of the gospel through a personal relationship with the living God. Time after time imperfect humans have introduced the gospel, by loving example, cultural diffusion, or by force, into a new culture. And time after time new, vibrant expressions of Christianity arise.



This is no less the case for what Wilson-Hartgrove calls "slaveholder religion." Slaves in the United States were often forced to worship like their masters, were fed distorted interpretations of scripture, and were severely restricted in their pursuit of knowledge about Christianity and the Bible. Nevertheless a distinct, vibrant, enduring, deep faith grew in the hearts of many slaves and continues through their descendants. Yet Wilson-Hartgrove seems stuck in the "slave religion" mode. He thinks white people especially are stuck in a form of Christianity that justifies chattel slavery and teaches white supremacy.



Wilson-Hartgrove is not an old guy. Based on the biographical info he alluded to, he's probably in his early 40s or so. So it's not as if he grew up in the midst of share cropping and Jim Crow. But he writes as if race relations are stuck in the first half of the 20th century. He did grow up in North Carolina; maybe that part of the country really is stuck. But that's not the impression I get from friends who live there.



Besides his writing from this position of racial division that seems distant from my everyday experience, when he writes about white Christianity, it feels like a straw man argument. He talks about white people needing to repent of their white religion and embrace true Christianity, and he has no trouble accusing prominent Christians like Franklin Graham of white supremacist tendencies. But I wonder if he actually came to my house, worshipped at my mostly white church with me, and spent a day in my neighborhood, if he'd still be as critical. I mean, it's easy to construct an image of this holdover religion of white supremacy that still believes Christians can hold slaves as long as they treat them well, but I just don't think this religion he speaks of is reality, except in tiny pockets that are shunned by reasonable people.



I've got news for Wilson-Hartgrove. Outside of the myopic, artificial world you imagine, there are lots of white and black Christians who get along just fine. There are lots of white Christians who go to mostly white churches and live in white neighborhoods and who love their black brothers and sisters without an ounce of animosity. And by the way, it's a human tendency to be with people like yourself. Black, white, hispanic, Asian, no matter what, people are often drawn to people with similar cultural backgrounds. If I go to a white church or marry a white woman, that doesn't mean I'm racist or a white supremacist. Also, in white churches I have attended, people of any race, ethnicity, or economic status have been warmly welcomed. And when I have visited black churches, I have been warmly welcomed. I have heard from friends on more that one occasion who were made to feel most unwelcome in black churches. Of course some blacks could say the same of churches they have visited.



So why did I hate this book? It's a constant drumbeat of accusation and condemnation of what Wilson-Hartgrove interprets as white privilege and racism. It's a 200 page apology for his being born white. The thing is, I would probably really like the guy. He's done some cool things in ministry. We have a lot in common in terms of religious background and family structure. I know he's trying to be prophetic, and I do admit there are some good things to reflect on here, whether you're black or white, but the judgmentalism and accusations were too much for me.



Oh, and I haven't even said anything about his political statements. Suffice it to say that if you voted for Trump, you are a white supremacist and probably beholden to slaveholder Christianity, blind to your own racism. Wilson-Hartgrove can't imagine a scenario in which a Christian would be justified in making a choice to vote against Hilary Clinton because of any moral, political, or economic differences one might have with her. He thinks it's terrible that 81% of white evangelicals (or whatever the figure is) voted for Trump. Maybe I find it offensive that 19% of white evangelicals would vote for someone who thinks Planned Parenthood, the killer of more African-Americans than any other cause, is just peachy and should get lots of tax money to fund their work. Or maybe, just maybe, I believe genuine Christians can have a variety of views on a range of issues, and can have a home in either political party or none. And maybe it's OK to disagree with someone's voting preferences without disparaging whole swaths of one's fellow Christians.



If you're a white Christian into self-flagellation and apology, you'll love this book. It will make you feel superior to your less-enlightened, white supremacist neighbors. But if you believe that all people of all races are sinful and in need of the grace of the unchanging, eternal savior, don't bother with Reconstructing the Gospel.





Thanks to NetGalley and the publisher for the complimentary electronic review copy!

A strong interpretation of our need to reconstruct the Gospel being preached from all too many pulpits and persons to reflect the Good News that is Jesus Christ.
If it is Good News for one, it is Good News for all. Without segregation or discrimination. Without support of one people group over another.
Jonathan Wilson=Hartgrove presents strong examples of what has been and what needs to be.. A thorough representation of his own life experiences of life in America's south; bringing his first hand account to readers' for their own recognition of life experiences they may not have explored til this reading.

Powerful. Convicting. Encouraging.

Recommending as a reliable witness to the beauty on the mountain of the feet of a messenger who brings Good News . . .

Having spent many of my formative years in the church of the South (and the remainder of them in a Southern Baptist church north of the Mason-Dixon Line), this book was intriguing to me. I found it to be a passionate and eloquent exploration of racism in the American Evangelical church and how white people can make a difference in that realm going forward. It strikes a good balance between being academically rigorous and applicable to everyday life. Reconstructing the Gospel is not a quick or easy read but it is a challenging addition to the unfortunately necessary list of books challenging the racism of the Christian church today.

I grew up in non-denominational white Protestant churches. Growing up I heard nothing about racial disparity or racism/politics at all in services; however, tangentially, heard a lot of racist rhetoric from talking heads on tvs. I'm glad that my parents raised me with good critical thinking skills but it would have been nicer to grow up more with the type of Christianity presented in this book. The author is so vulnerable and honest talking about his realization of growing up in a passively racist environment and how different interactions in his life caused him to confront and grow out of that. Also the theology in this is good theology, the gospel presented is a more perfect gospel than the gospel of white Christianity that is a gospel of segregation and oppression (which of course isn't a gospel at all). My only complaint is that it gets a little repetitive.

When I first saw the title ‘Reconstructing the Gospel’ I must say that I was very intrigued. Was the book going to say that we have gotten the gospel wrong? Was it going to suggest ways in which we could fix the ‘divided gospel’? I must say that whilst the title intrigued me, the content was more of an analysis of the American church and the history of what Wilson-Hartgrove describes as ‘slaveholder religion’.

Possibly one of the problems, when I was reading the book, was that the division that Wilson-Hartgrove speaks of is unfamiliar to me. Being a Scot I haven’t seen the division within the American church over race, but only heard of it.

However, this book is a good insight into the racial issues that can be seen unfolding within the American church and it is a helpful insight for people, like myself, who maybe don’t fully understand the situation.

For a slightly longer review visit my blog: https://achalmersblog.wordpress.com

A personal story of reflection regarding the Christianity in which the author was raised and his reckoning and grappling with its roots in and complicity with slavery, white supremacy, and oppression, and the attempt to "reconstruct" the Gospel to be more consistent with the Good News of Jesus.

The author is white and shares his story of having to acknowledge how churches in the American South perpetuated oppression both in the days of slavery and long afterward, and how it remains embodied in much of what passes for Evangelical political action. He speaks of getting to know black people active in the community and the church in North Carolina and how those experiences transformed him. He writes of the work of justice being done which seeks to relieve oppression.

For those willing to hear, and especially those who already agree with at least most of the author's premises, the book is powerful and compelling. Yet I wonder how it would be viewed by who would be ostensibly the author's desired audience, those who have not yet come to his viewpoint: it may seem strident and overly, to put it nicely, "prophetic" in tone. At times the author becomes guilty of confusing the symptom from the cause: colonialism, and the spread of capitalism as the world's economy, for instance, do not stem from "slaveholder religion," but come from farther upstream, Western cultural and religious chauvinism which defined how it looked at the world, led its people to explore and conquer and enslave, and remains in many forms to this day.

Overall a challenging message to hear for those willing to hear it. Most of the time the author is not wrong. That does not mean that what he has to say is easy to absorb.

Summary: “There is no way to preach the gospel without proclaiming that the unjust systems of this world must give way to the reign of a new King."

Over the past 15-20 years there has been increasing discussion about the meaning of the word ‘gospel’. At the top level most everyone can agree that the ‘Gospels’ are the four books that open the New Testament and the ‘Gospel’ is the message of Christianity. Gospel is derived from the Greek euangelion which means good news. Understanding what is, and is not, ‘the gospel’ matters, it isn’t just semantics.

I pushed back pretty hard against Matt Chandler’s The Explicit Gospel because he didn’t have an ending to what needed to be included in the gospel and while I affirm that we have to actually use words, the gospel does not require a belief in 7 day creation or male only understanding of the role of pastor to be the gospel.

Scot McKnight I think had a helpful corrective to the ‘gospel movement’ with King Jesus Gospel which refocuses the meaning of the gospel on Jesus Christ’s Lordship. NT Wright’s Simply Good News takes a similar approach focusing on Jesus as King and restorer.

But each of these authors batting around the term gospel seem to focus primarily on gospel as intellectual content. Allen Yeh in his chapter in Still Evangelical focuses the problem not on the meaning of the actual word gospel (or evangelical) but the bias toward orthodoxy without paying enough attention to orthodpraxy. This isn’t a new charge. Lesslie Newbigin in his 1986 Foolishness to the Greeks: The Gospel and Western Culture focuses on how the gospel has been rooted in the West in a particular view of culture and practice.

I could easily keep going on. I have 163 reviews at Bookwi.se that include the word gospel. The meaning of gospel or the focus of the gospel or the practice of the gospel matter because we believe that our Christianity matters. This is not a discussion that is going away and this is not a discussion that is solved by Johnathan Wilson-Hartgrove’s new book Reconstructing the Gospel: Finding Freedom from Slaveholder Religion.

Reconstructing the Gospel is playing on the title of the book The Third Reconstruction which Wilson-Hartgrove co-wrote with William Barber. Both of these books reference the historical period of Reconstruction which in popular historical understanding is a period of failed political intervention after the Civil War. Recent historians, like Eric Foner have been re-writing that popular understanding of Reconstruction for the past 20-30 years.

The Christian hiphop artist Propaganda created a firestorm with his song Precious Puritans in 2012. Propaganda suggested that something is missing from our gospel presentation when we point to historical Christian figures but miss the fact that many of these giants of the faith in the United States were slaveholders. Johnathan Edwards, often called the greatest theologian of North America, owned a slave.

Johnathan Wilson-Hartgrove recounts the last 20 or so years of discovering his faith and the holes in his faith because he had absorbed a Christianity that had blindspots toward injustice. Wilson-Hartgrove’s story is similar to stories of a number of people that I know. They knew that Jesus loves everyone. They knew that we can be saved by placing our faith in Jesus Christ. But when they actually started living with people that were poor they realized that something was missing.

Michael Emerson and Christian Smith, in their book Divided by Faith, talk about a ‘magic motif’ that is present in many people’s understanding of Christianity. Emerson and Smith found that when confronted about problems around racism many White Christians assumed that racism would be eliminated if enough people actually became Christians. There is an individualism in the assumptions brought up by the ‘magic motif’, an assumption that the problem isn’t systemic, but individual sin. Wilson-Hartgrove says clearly, “There is no way to preach the gospel without proclaiming that the unjust systems of this world must give way to the reign of a new King."

Reconstructing the Gospel isn’t just Wilson-Hargrove’s story, although his own discovery as an illustration of the weaknesses of Christianity in America is important. This is largely a historical book. It isn’t only that White Christians held slaves. It is that before, and after slavery, the problem is a Christianity that didn’t see slavery (or Jim Crow, or other injustice) as a problem.

Because Wilson-Hargrove lives in North Carolina he devotes more time to local history there. The first big movie in the US, The Birth of a Nation, an openly racist movie, was based on a book by a pastor in New York City. The Biblical Recorder, a Baptist Newspaper in North Carolina, encouraged people to go see it so that they could see an,

“Invisible Empire of defeated soldiers who in poverty and weakness by the might of right and courage of consecration to all that is holy, terrorized the aliens that had assumed to rule them, disarmed the black cohorts, struck down their white satraps, and drove out from the Temple of our Liberties the horde that had been put in possession of the holy of holies itself."
The myth of the Lost Cause that was celebrated in The Birth of a Nation was a reimagining of the Reconstruction period. That gospel of the Lost Cause infected the Gospel of Jesus Christ. The corrective to the gospel of the Lost Cause was the message Howard Thurman’s Jesus and the Disinherited and others. Thurman and others, primarily minority Christians that understood the blindspots of the gospel, have been calling attention to those weaknesses for generations.

Wilson-Hartgrove references Martin Luther King Jr’s (strongly influenced by Howard Thurman) focus at the 1968 Poor People’s campaign. The point of that campaign was to:

“dramatize for the nation the divide between rich and poor, the story of Lazarus and Dives became a parable that spoke to the soul of America. Dives didn’t go to hell, King began to say, because he was rich. He went to hell because he could not see his neighbor, Lazarus. Dives went to hell because he was blinded by so-called privilege. And America, too, would go to hell, unless she made a concerted effort to correct the systemic economic injustice created by generations of stolen labor.”
The second half of Reconstructing the Gospel is about how Wilson-Hartgrove has relearned what the gospel is about. And it is going to be a message that will be resisted because it isn’t a simple ‘have a better understanding of the gospel’. The way that the gospel is reconstructed is by spending years living with and learning from those that are poor and those that have been ‘disinherited’ and those that have been doing the work of the gospel for decades. That work is slow because the discovery of blindspots is slow.

This isn’t a straight line growth model. Because we are human. The opening of the book is a relatively recent story and Wilson-Hartgrove has been living among and learning from the poor for decades at this point. He hasn’t learned all there is to learn. His understanding of the gospel hasn’t ‘been fixed’. He will continue, like all of us, to have blindspots.

I have been on a journey to open my eyes to my blindspots around race for years. And I can see many of the ones I used to have, but the very nature of a blindspot means that I have not identified those that I have not yet identified. I was frequently frustrated by reading Reconstructing the Gospel. I want a quicker solution. I am afraid of the indictment that is presented here. I do not want to lose the historical church in the process of cleaning up my understanding of the gospel. But Propaganda was right. If our understanding of the Puritans (or anyone else) is more precious than the gospel, or more precious than the people around us that are in need of the whole gospel, then there is a problem.

Reconstructing the Gospel is not a negative book. The stories of individuals and churches, especially the stories at the end of the book are hopeful. Some really do get it. And there is hope for me and other readers if we are willing to keep pushing. But it is not going to be easy to remove the stain of sin from our understanding of the gospel.

Reconstructing the Gospel: Finding Freedom from Slaveholder Religion by Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove Purchase Links: Hardcover, Kindle Edition, Audible.com Audiobook

Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove has created a piece both timely and thoughtful, a challenging affront to systemic racial attitudes. His background resonates with my own, and I feel a genuine sense of walking side by side through critical issues of humanity as I read.

Early on, Wilson-Hartgrove introduces the idea of Jesus healing the blind, paralleling that with the process many of us need to experience. It’s an easy line to draw from this idea to being “woke,” but the challenge goes beyond that. This is more than realizing that the world isn’t as you thought it was. It’s being able to claim the role you may have played in perpetuating the subversion of the gospel, whether on purpose or not. The issues of race and religion are real, division is something which should not be in our church. This is a mandate from our Savior, echoed in every page of this book.

The author has physically participated in the lives of “others” as he takes this journey himself. In that, we move from an academic discussion about race to a real person opening himself up to the experience of change. It’s honest at every turn, an open embrace to take part in the lives of those who share God’s image.