An eco-political-socio-philosophical essay, Chaumin's Simplicism is an attempt to nudge the public's conscience into making a concerted effort to eradicate poverty in the world. Citing facts regarding the poverty and resources of various countries, he suggests that the citizens of these nations should collectively attempt to eradicate their poverty. While there does not seem any particular reason why he chooses these nations, there are however, a few surprises in the facts provided. A discussion of the facts is outside the scope of this review as it would be a spoiler. As the title suggests it is written in a simplistic style offering a simplistic solution. Over the centuries, similar arguments have been put forward in greater depth and detail. True sometimes they did serve as a call to the masses to effect change. Unfortunately, sentiments such as corruption, selfishness, greed, depravity to name a few prevailed. Moreover, as he is quick to point out they are the cause of this deplorable state of affairs. If indeed, one's willingness as he asserts were sufficient to cause change, poverty would certainly have been eradicated by now. Therein lies the inherent flaw in this book and consequent arguments. Moreover, the how suggested by Chaumin is equally naïve. Opportunistic man tends to be selfish and it will take more than their conscience, if they have any, to do what's right. Besides, no two nations being alike, each would need their own individual plan or an incorruptible outside force. Again, history teaches us that sadly, baser instincts prevail and this is still true of the 21st century. We have yet to evolve to that sublime state. Until then any outside interference would be self-serving and one can gain insight into the likely scope of this debacle by reading other works. Yeah, an analysis of human history serves as a cautionary tale here. The masses in some of the poorest nations outlined in his book lack the wherewithal a.k.a knowledge to pull off such an ambitious project. Thus they are vulnerable to exploitation from within (their corrupt governments are proof of this) and outside. Perhaps he plans a sequel, a gargantuan task indeed that would outline such a plan for each of these nations. Could it be kept simple in the vein of Simplicism without being gullible? Highly unlikely, but it maybe within his talents. Perhaps here he may factor in an in depth political analysis simplistically framed unlike his current naïve argument. Yet another failing of this effort. Perhaps this plan will suggest how these nations can shield themselves from exploitation. Chaumin mentions Jesus – who incidentally is incorruptible and can usher in such an era. Yet even in the millennium, poverty does exist but is taken care of. If indeed Chaumin is one of those who think this is the Millennium, then the enemies noose is too long. Better then to view this as a test we are passing thru'. Chaumins arguments will then take on a new realistic meaning, more as an effort towards greatly lessening the burden rather than an expectation of total eradication, tho there is no reason why not, should all mankind be good. There is always that nearly insurmountable hurdle - selfishness that thwarts perfection in all human endeavour. Thus, despite the suggestive title the book does not put forward any actionable solution to the problem. At best, it would serve as a clarion call to the masses to make a cohesive effort towards this goal. Who indeed would pick up this call, action it to the benefit of those needy and how. The book receives 3 stars as one felt all should have the opportunity to read and decide for oneself.