Destiny of Kings is described as being a twist on the Old Testament tale of King David. But I picked it up because it was categorised as ‘fantasy’, promising magic and struggles and battles.

First things first: the religious side definitely overshadows anything fantastical. For some, I imagine this is a strong selling point and they would thoroughly enjoy the book. Personally (just my opinion here), too much emphasis was placed on the whole ‘one true God’ which stopped me from connecting emotionally with the book.

However, it wasn’t the genre that really put me off. It was the characters.

David was perfect. Without even speaking to Martinez, he leaves a lasting impression on him. Martinez recognises a man – no, a boy – of great talent and wisdom and welcomes him with open arms when David takes off after the army. All he did was not interrupt a conversation!

But of course, David can also perfectly play the harp and sing, making the king immediately hire him as a companion and a…bodyguard? A sixteen-year-old kid who has never fought before? That makes sense!

Never fear though, because it only takes a few lessons before David can horse-ride, use a bow with deadly accuracy and look at that, he is even good with a sword. Did I mention he can also handle all his older brothers, despite having described them as having a temper?

Talking of said brothers – several are mentioned, as are lots of sisters. But only two are named, and only one sister. It would have been nice for more character development – or even names – here.

The timing doesn’t help. Apart from a few occasions where it states months have passed, it was incredibly difficult to judge the passing of time. For instance, when David is training, the whole chapter reads as if it takes place over a couple of days. Later on, however, it mentions weeks have passed. With no concept of how much time has passed, it’s harder to accept David’s progression because it seems to just happen.

Every character in this book – male and female, David included – only thinks lust-filled thoughts. Jezabel is a temptress, true, but literally all she does is plan who to bed next. The king can’t think with his brain and even David describes one of his wives as his “pleasure-playground”. A character can justify what they say to their comrades. But never should a narrator try and explain what they’re thinking – that initial thought made the impression, and trying to backtrack and make sure he sounds like a good guy again just made it worse.

I understand the several wives. But I didn’t understand how David was supposedly enamoured with one, goes off, finds a damsel in distress and without any further ado, marries her as well. It didn’t make any sense.

Unfortunately, as you can tell, this was not a book for me. Maybe with a greater understanding of religion, I would have enjoyed it more, but it just infuriated me.

Thankyou to NetGalley, BooksGoSocial and Fiona Tarr for the opportunity to read an advanced readers copy of Destiny Of Kings.
I enjoyed reading this book. The storyline gets you in and keeps the reader entertained to the very last page. Will definitely be on the lookout for book 2.