I was positively hyperventilating at the thought of a newly translated W F Hermans novella. (And novella is it, despite the claims of the book cover.) Taking. my cue from other bloggers, I am currently compiling my 100 book capsule library. It’s proving difficult, but the first book on the list is a no brainer. I have decided that Hermans’s The Darkroom of Damocles is my favourite novel of all time. Hermans was a prolific writer, but pitifully little of his oeuvre has been translated into English (due apparently to the writer’s unwillingness.) Let’s hope that the publication of An Untouched House by Pushkin Press is the herald of a future feast to come.

257D5605-7247-47F4-99B2-BE3D894FE99FTranslated from Dutch by David Colmer, An Untouched House takes us to the Eastern Europe during the end days of World War II. The unnamed Dutch protagonist is fighting with a group of partisans. In the midst of battle, his commander sends him on a search for booby traps. When he finds a huge house, abandoned by its occupants, yet otherwise untouched by the war, full of creature comforts, he decides he’s going to stay. He discards his uniform and pretends to be the owner. When the Germans requisition the house, he puts up no resistance and manages to persuade the troops to leave him in peace in the rooms he now calls his own.

Is this desertion, collusion with the enemy or simple pragmatism? Hermans offers no comment, and at this point, there is a slightly comic feel in the absurdity of the story. Days of cohabitation with the troops pass by peacefully. But the mood darkens when the house owner reappears, and our “hero” reveals himself to be the antihero more commonly associated with Hermans’s work, one more aligned to the author’s view of there being only “a thin veneer covering the monstrousness of human nature”.

A monstrousness that the partisan is prepared to unleash without compunction in order to preserve his cushy number. And one which is then dwarfed by the sickening atrocities that take place as the Germans lose ground and the partisans overrun the house. What will our protagonist do? His days of rest are over, he now has to save himself from the firing squad.

He does so in a way that raises a wry smile. Because there is a suggestion that this is not the first time he has used the same ruse. Perhaps it is his way of surviving the war and who can blame him in the face of the amorality that surrounds him

The lack of moral judgment is key to Hermans’s work. The story does all the talking. There’s no honour in war. It’s devastating, and brings out the worst in mankind. There are those who try to preserve a common decency, a semblance of civilisation. The German commander, for example, prevents his men from rampaging through the house, and takes pride in maintaining his toilette.

Since joining the army […] I have shaved every day without fail at exactly half past six in the morning. […] That is what I understand by culture!’

Pitifully little, it is all he can do. Unfortunately it is insufficient to save him – and the house, which has done nothing but provide shelter – from the savagery of war. As Cees Nooteboom points out in the really informative afterword, Hermans believed in the malice of a sadistic universe. And that is exactly what is portrayed in the end pages of this novella. Not for the faint-hearted.

"Creative nihilism, aggressive pity, total misanthropy”
Hermans delivers on his own self-description here. A deceptively simple story of a unnamed tired soldier occupying a house in an unnamed town, this is a blistering novella lacking any sentimentality giving a portrait of a time with no purpose. The narrator really no longer understands (or cares to) with whom or why he's fighting so when he stumbles on this untouched house that seems separate from the war, he clings onto it with all his might. This novella is particularly good at conveying that pointlessness, cruelty of wartime and it is bleak. It is bleak but somehow, compelling to read-couldn't put it down though it made my skin crawl.

When we read about history in non-fiction, especially in textbooks, we tend to read about the broad movements of armies. We read about regiments, battalions, and squads in combat and the statistical outcomes. What we don’t usually get is the sheer chaotic confusion of battle. In Willem Frederik Hermans’ An Untouched House (translated by David Colmer), we get not only the confusion but the absurdity of war. In this novel, an unnamed Dutch partisan gets separated from the rest of his group someone in Germany. He finds a house that has miraculously survived the destruction of the war and billets himself for a little peace and quiet. And then a squad of German soldiers show up.

Our unnamed protagonist has been at war for four years by the time we meet him in this very short novella. We don’t learn much about his background except that he’s Dutch and that he’s been with a motley international group of partisans for a while. In most books about World War II that I’ve read, lavish attention is spent on the heroes’ backgrounds and how they were harmed by the Nazis. There is none of that in An Untouched House. So instead of seeing the protagonist as an avenger or even clearly as a Good Guy, we can only focus on what’s happening on the page. It’s only historical context that lets us know who is on the right side.

After a brief firefight, in which our protagonist kills several German soldiers, he finds a large house that appears to be safe. Not only does the house not have any apparent damage, it’s full of food and clothing. Our pragmatic protagonist makes himself comfortable. He shaves and bathes for the first time in ages. He changes his clothes. He eats a good meal. Until the Germans show up, he’s in the pink, considering he’s in the middle of a war zone.

After the Germans show up, the protagonist has to run a merry dance to make sure the Germans don’t know who he is. It would be funny (and it kind of is) if there wasn’t so much at stake. Later, when the Germans clear out and the protagonist is discovered by another group of partisans, the tone is deadly serious once more. Our protagonist commits acts that require us to immediately reevaluate him as a sympathetic character. And then there is the stark difference between the behavior of the Germans and the partisans, like night and day. Where the Germans are courteous and follow rules, the partisans are rapacious boors.

This novella asks us to stop viewing history in the broad strokes we were taught. The Nazis are still the bad guys and the Allies and partisans are still the good guys. But things break down when we start to look at individuals. Of course, the German soldiers could’ve committed atrocities before they found the protagonist. They also think that the protagonist is a wealthy German, so they’re on their best behavior. The partisans may have done good deeds before they arrived at the house. An Untouched House is not apologia. I think it merely asks us to look back at history with a more granular eye.

Set during World War ll, this fever dream of a plotless novella has a Soviet Partisan soldier chancing upon an abandoned house. As the Nazis suddenly appear in his temporary sanctuary, he pretends to be the owner of the house—and the real owner shows up. The prose is beautiful in this Dutch classic, with startling moments of insight and imagery. The trauma of war, nihilism, and futility of the human condition makes it a challenging read. The mood is overwhelmingly bleak.

Translated from Dutch by David Colmer with a particularly insightful afterword by Cees Noteboom.

A powerful and nightmarish portrayal of the absurdity and pointlessness of war. The narrator is a Dutch partisan fighting with the Russians towards the end of WWII. Amidst the chaos he finds himself in an abandoned spa town and makes himself at home in a deserted mansion. Later the Germans arrive and requisition the house. The house has offered a brief respite from the violence and horror but the author casts an unflinching gaze at the senseless violence that ensues. It’s a dark and disturbing tale, made all the more horrific by the spare and unemotional prose in which the narrators’ thoughts are couched. First published in 1951 and now available in a new English translation, it surely ranks among other classics of war writing, and I am very pleased to have discovered it.

This is the first of Hermans’ works that I have read. This is at least partly due to there being very little of his work available in English which is the only language I am comfortable reading in. According to Wikipedia, this novella was the first of Hermans’ works to be translated into English when it was called The House of Refuge and was included in a collection called “The World of Modern Fiction” in 1966. Now a new translation from David Colmer is being released and my thanks to he publisher and NetGalley for a review copy.

As Hermans is new to me, I took a bit of time to investigate the author. It seems he is known for his pessimistic view of humankind. In particular, relevant to this novella, he sees civilisation as a very thin veneer over a much darker and chaotic human nature. And he sees war as a place where that dark side is released i.e. a place where we see the reality of people that we normally keep suppressed. To an extent, this view reminded me of the film “Saving Private Ryan” where the battle scenes, especially the long opening scene, show men descending into inhuman violence and becoming more and more animal-like.

It is this descent that Hermans manages to chronicle in what is actually a very short novella. A soldier fighting with the partisans in 1944 in the Second World War comes across a house that appears to be untouched by war and abandoned. This is the first sign of an almost dream-like, nightmarish, quality to the book (the locked room in the house will be another later on, and there are others). Our narrator moves in and, when the German troops arrive he decides to assume the role of the owner which the troops accept. This is working well until the real owner (or, at least, someone with a more realistic claim to ownership) turns up. Gradually, the instinct for self-preservation starts to take over and the violence escalates. Then the Germans lose control of the town again and the partisans go on a rampage bringing the book to a violent, destructive and bloody end.

War is a nightmare. War is, if you take Hermans’ pessimistic outlook on people, mankind acting without the veneer of civilisation and showing its true colours. It is, ultimately, a depressing but thought-provoking story.

The renowned Dutch author Willem Frederik Hermans remains rather undertranslated, and consequently underappreciated in English, so this new translation from David Colmer, published by Archipelago Press in the US and Pushkin Press in the UK, is very welcome.

In an informative afterword Cees Nooteboom quotes Hermans' own description of his credo:
"Creative nihilism, aggressive pity, total misanthropy” and his World War II based books, notably his most famous work in English The Darkroom of Damocles and this one, reflect that - there are no heroes in Hermans war, no sentimentality, no ideology, just chaos, brutality and the desperation to survive.

It is 1944, and our unnamed first person narrator, having left the Netherlands in November 1940, is fighting with the Russians somewhere on the front (perhaps near Breslau), part of an international band of partisans. As he explains in broken French to a Spaniard, himself a civil war refugee of 8 years service:

"“Me spy,” I said. “Little...” With my hands I indicated the degree to which I had been a spy, thinking about the next sentence. “Captured by Germans. Prison. Sentenced. Three years. Hard labor. On way to different prison, escape. Captured again. Concentration camp. Strellwitz. You know Strellwitz? Six months. Escape again. Caught, close to Swiss border. Jump out of train in Saxony. Walk, keep walking east.”"

Amidst the chaos of a battle he ponders that on the one hand his life is in imminent danger at all times, but on the other hand does the wider world war really exist in terms of his day-to-day reality:

"The bullets from their machine guns drilled into the nearby ground. It could happen now too, I thought, and I’m just sitting here, not doing anything, thirsty. I could get hit now too, as if sitting was punishable by death. But death comes for everyone, even without any wars . What difference does war make? – Imagine somebody who doesn’t have a memory, who can’t think of anything beyond what he sees, hears and feels. . . War doesn’t exist for him. He sees the hill, the sky, he feels the dry membranes of his throat shrinking, he hears the boom of . . . he’d need a memory to know what’s causing it."

Consistent with that his division find themselves in an abandoned town and sent on a vague reconnaissance mission he finds himself in an abandoned but large house:

"The inhabitants must have fled or been evacuated. Two dogs came towards me. I held out a hand, but they were chasing each other and took no notice. It made me feel like I was dead, as if I could see them, but they could not see me. I couldn’t shake the thought that they had run right through me instead of past me. All I heard was their panting and the click of claws on cobblestones. The abandoned houses were about to stir and gather round me, offering themselves to me like women in travel stories about Indochina. The war had never really taken place; as long as I wasn’t wounded, nothing had happened. There had never been any other people, not in my lifetime, nowhere in the whole world.
....
After going into the front garden and making my way across the lawn to the steps, I realized that this would be the first time in a very long while that I had entered a real house, a genuine home. I had slept in prisons, in barracks, on straw in classrooms, once under a truck, in haystacks , in goods wagons. For three years I hadn’t once spent the night anywhere except shelters where people only worked, waited, or were held prisoner : police or railway stations, barns; a week in a hospital."

An idyllic scene although his description contains one hint of the horrors to come:

"There was a sloping, dark green lawn with a large plane tree in the middle that had been pollarded so many times it now looked like a gallows with room for an entire family."

He decides to stay in the house and leave the war behind, hiding his gun and uniform, rather fortunately as the German forces quickly retake the town in a counterattack and he is able to pass himself off as the house-owner to a (it must be said rather cliched) German officer:

"He began to make a show of tapping a cigarette on a silver case. “Since joining the army,”he said, “I have shaved every day without fail at exactly half past six in the morning. With hot water. I have been in the army for forty years today. Shaving with hot water, war or no war! That is what I understand by culture!”Although taller than me, he kept bouncing up and down, making his boots creak. “Culture gives no quarter! Culture is a single whole! Extraordinary circumstances are only an excuse! Someone who gives in to extraordinary circumstances, nah! He is simply no longer a person of culture!”I said nothing. You make me sick to my stomach, I thought.

In the last war the British barrage began one morning at quarter past six. At half past I began shaving. It was too dark in the trench, so I moved to higher ground. That cost me half my little finger. But at half past seven I was sitting down to eat breakfast!”"

But as he gradually realises he is not alone in the house, as someone else claiming (more plausibly) to be the owner returns, as the German troops become suspicious and as the Russians counter-counter-attack, he has to resort to increasingly violent acts to maintain his peaceful existence, leading him to question what he has become:

"This bowl of bone covered with its lid and its movable hide, this was where it all came from: the other people, the world, the war, the dreams, the words, the deeds that seemed to happen so automatically it was impossible to imagine ever having been capable of thinking things through; as automatically as if one’s deeds were the world’s thoughts. You would need a second head to understand what that first head was, but I only had one, here in my hands, holding it in a way people never hold anything else. Yet, if not for the claims of scholars , you wouldn’t know your head was any different from your hand or foot."

And as he leaves the house for good he realises that: "it was like it had been putting on an act the whole time and was only now showing itself as it, in reality, had always been : a hollow, drafty cavern, rancid and rotting at its core".

A short and relatively simple but powerful story and a great introduction to Hermans work.

Thanks to Archipelago Press and Netgalley for the ARC.

How best to convey, in writing, the indescribable horrors of war? Some authors place us in the midst of the battlefield, on the front line, in the trenches. Others take us to blitzed and occupied cities, with tales of ordinary lives in extraordinary circumstances. Others discern some light in the darkness of the carnage – acts of valour, of compassion, of kindness which provide a welcome contrast to the bloodshed.

The novels of Dutch author Willem Frederik Hermans show us “the absurdity, cruelty and pointlessness of war”, as Cees Nooteboom explains in the afterword to this edition of “An Untouched House”. For Hermans, war is just another facet of what he considered a “sadistic Universe”. There is therefore a metaphysical, cosmic underpinning to the author’s work, and it is unremittingly bleak.

This novella, first published in 1951, is now available to English readers in a translation by David Colmer. This might be a book about war, but its setting is surprisingly distant from any ‘traditional’ battle, at least at first. The unnamed narrator, a Dutch member of the resistance, finds himself in a deserted spa town and discovers an abandoned, palatial house, seemingly untouched by the fighting. He deserts his fellow combatants and instals himself in it.

There is something surreal about the house. With its magical feel and its mysterious locked room, it seems to come out of a fairytale, not unlike the ‘lost chateau’ in Le Grand Meaulnes. It is hardly surprising then the narrator starts to believe that he will be safe from harm as long as he remains within it. But even this house will become a theatre of war. When the house is requisitioned by the German troops occupying the town, the narrator wildly holds on to his fantasy by pretending he is the owner. Eventually the NAzis are ousted by the Russian troops, aided by the Resistance. And so it is that the real world dispels the protagonist’s dreams, and what initially seemed a setting peripheral to the conflict is also touched by the “sadism of the Universe”.

Indeed, a defining element of this novel is its unrelenting violence, which reaches gut-wrenching levels in the final pages. Tinged with black humour and purposely over the top, the novel’s climax reads like a scene out of a Tarantino movie. No side is spared any punches: not the German soldiers, disseminating fear whilst acting as self-proclaimed defenders of “culture”; not the Russians or the partisans, at whose hands the town collapses into chaos. No wonder this novel made its author unpopular in some quarters. It is a veritable kick in the guts, a powerful indictment of war.