Member Reviews

A really interesting book. As someone who has been a long-time observer and low-impact participant in a number of fandoms (SFF, movies, sports - Go Raptors!), I found it a valuable and engaging read. Definitely worth reading.

Was this review helpful?

An academic look at the ways corporations use fandom to sell product and build consumer communities that then become easier to manipulate. and extract value from. It can get rather technical and statistical, but since I love that kind of info, it was right up my alley. A valuable resource if you want to understand what is happening in the world of fandom and the mindset that causes people to become attached to sports teams, entertainment franchises, and other entities that have developed large followings, as well as how those entities use fans to their advantage.

Was this review helpful?

I've been in fandom since the usenet days, and lived through the days when a few high name authors went on rampages to destroy the fandom works based on their books.... (Rice, Gabaldon, etc.) This book shows the shift I've seen from the fan as the "adversary" to the originator holding onto and essentially profiting, from their work, to the fans as a tool to be utilized. Everything from using fans to keep a show on tv, to using their fandom creations to create promo work, and now to the outright stealing of fandom created merch, ideas, etc., by the actual showrunners, as budgets get cut. The fans have almost become a supplement for networks and publishing houses to get the material and not have to pay. This book explores how the relationship is becoming more and more toxic as bigger companies and creators realize just how much control they have and how much fans want to be acknowledged at any cost. Not only that, but what does it mean to the actual fandom in general?

Was this review helpful?

This is a clear case of it's not you (book), it's me. For this is a well written academic approach on how, as the title suggests, media industry exploits fans on various levels. The author focuses (not only, but mainly) on sports and speculative fiction.

The theme, tone and structure is purely academic. The first chapters deal, in great detail, with the author's approach, work and general line of argumentation. Fandom itself is described in detail, or rather: what the media industry wants/regards as fans (male, white, hetereosexual being mostly in favour). Marginalisation of groups that don't fit in this scheme is a huge and important theme.

The middle part describes of how fans are exploited. Be it their lack of rights vs. the everchanging and all consuming TOS of the media industry or the industry's expectation of fans working, paying, living and whatnot for their show/film/team without getting any serious recognition (only more and stricter TOS). It's an unfair, unbalanced system, and it was these parts that got me thinking. The final chapter draws a conclusion, as to be expected.

The writing is okay-ish. I had difficulties approaching it in a way that kept me focussed, and sadly, the text itself threw me out again and again, for the author barely uses any footnotes but credits her sources within the text, giving names and publication dates and brackets right after every quote, direct or indirect, mid-sentence or not. Which interrupted my flow again and again and didn't help matters at all.

This just wasn't the kind of book I thought it would be. I thought it would be more accessible, with more down to earth examples especially from fans'/fandoms' perspective. This book is probably a very valuable source for media students and the like, it just wasn't for me.

Was this review helpful?

Brilliant and enlightening read. I like the academic approach to the topic, especially given that it can be personal to some that feel they have been exploited.

Was this review helpful?

The material presented here is incredibly dense but eye-opening. As someone who has been involved in fandom to various degrees my entire life, the idea of being exploited (even without my awareness) is one that sat very uncomfortably with me. Stanfill's arguments very much fit my personal experience of fandom but gave them a twist that made me see them in a new light. The shifting view of copyright from "monopoly" to "ownership" explained so much about the way IP content is approached from a transformative perspective but left me feeling a little icky. In the end, the question was not one of whether the exploitation of fandom is morally right, but more one focused on the fact that without knowing how (and that) we are being exploited, we don't even have a voice at the table.

Was this review helpful?

Far more academic in nature than I was expecting, which was definitely a good thing in this instance. Certainly insightful in a number of places. Think it would make a decent further reading suggestion for students enrolled in a media student courses.

Found the chapter covering media giants tasking fans of television shows and films with doing the work of marketing companies for free rather illuminating.

With thanks to the publisher and Netgalley for the ARC.

Was this review helpful?

Considering the subject matter, I was expecting a more compelling read.

It felt long and rambling at times and that seriously removed from the book.

I am disappointed.

Was this review helpful?

I received an ARC of this book thanks to Net Galley and publisher University of Iowa Press in exchange for an honest review.

This was such an interesting read to me! When I requested it, I wasn't sure what to expect. I have minor academic experience of media studies and essentially no background in business, sports or any of the topics this book could come under (apart from a personal interest in demographics). The introduction was very dull for me as it is essentially just a list of the methodology. This was probably necessary as this seems to have been adapted from a dissertation or some other academic paper, but it wasn't really a great start to the book. Thankfully it was uphill from there.

By far my favourite sections were the first two chapters which focus on how sports and the media identify and view their fans in terms of demographics. Some fascinating points were made about how the industries assume default fan is a white male and how this influences both their marketing and reaction to fan behaviour. The author uses a wide range of sources and examples which creates a very in-depth and insightful look at fandom as a whole. I loved this section and thought it was excellently written.

The next bit was about the legality and fan's knowledge of the law. I must admit, I did skip most of this section. Law has never been interesting to me and while I was curious about fanfiction and the laws surrounding that, most of the focus was on fan's perception of the law without clarifying what the actual law was. I can see this being interesting to some but sadly it was not for me.

The final chapters are what I suppose the book is mainly about-that is, how fans engage in free labour due to their love of a work/sports team and how industries exploit this. These parts were fairly interesting and again, made some very good points. I would have liked to see this section expanded more with specific examples though. Every other section has lots of examples which illustrate the arguments well but there weren't many to be found in this bit. I know fandom's mere existence is a form of free labour in itself (promoting etc) but it still could have been interesting to find anecdotes of fans' work being used professionally or something similar.

Overall, I think this book's topic wasn't actually as for me as I thought it would be but I still enjoyed it immensely. It has well-written, thoroughly researched content and a cohesive narrative that brings everything together beautifully. There are some well-argued points to be made here and I think it raises some interesting questions. I would definitely recommend this book if you have any interest in fandom and how the industries treat their fans. Just be aware that it is an academic work and so some parts might be a bit dry or less compelling than others.

Overall Rating: 4/5

Was this review helpful?