The premise of the book is great and the author really delivers. Great read. Highly recommended. .

I was really excited after reading the synopsis for this book. However, it fell flat to me. I know this was based on a true story, but it’s hard to know what was true and what wasn’t. I think the original memoir may have been better.

In his Author’s Note, Edward Conlon explains that The Policewomen’s Bureau is a lightly fictionalised account of the life of Marie Cirile-Spagnuolo, who began her career with the NYPD in 1957. A former officer himself, Conlon was fascinated by Marie’s experience as a married Italian woman in a male-dominated, predominantly Irish police department, and worked with her on this novel before her death in 2011.

Asked what is true, Conlon answers “Most of it, and the worst of it.”

In The Policewomen’s Bureau, Marie Carrara is a new recruit in the 44th Precinct. It’s 1957, and the majority of the NYPD believe the force is no place for a woman. Most serving female officers are tasked with matron duty, used to guard female prisoners, console victims, search dead female bodies, and, more often than not, fetch and carry for their male colleagues, never leaving the precinct. But there are a handful of women who are reluctantly called upon to assist in cases that require a woman’s touch. These women are under the command of Inspector Melchionne of the Policewomen’s Bureau, and Marie is excited to join them after six months on the job.

Despite her startling naivety, not unexpected for a young Catholic woman in the 1950’s, Marie quickly finds she enjoys, and has a talent for, the undercover work she is tasked with. I enjoyed Conlon’s descriptions of her activities which are interesting, and often amusing. Her first case requires her to apply for a job with a man who is sexually assaulting many of the young female applicants. While she is successful, it takes a few hits with her blackjack to cool his ardour, and while waiting for patrol officers to arrive she decides to tidy up, throwing out a canister of ‘spoiled’ sugar (which is later found to be cocaine), and incinerating a stack of dirty pictures.

I was disappointed to learn in an author interview that the only purely fictional part of Conlon’s novel is Marie’s later work with the detective squads. I don’t begrudge Conlon taking fictional licence, and these sections were well written and entertaining, however I can’t help but feel as if it somewhat negates the real Marie’s accomplishments as a pioneering policewoman.

Conlon also weaves the professional and personal together in The Policewomen’s Bureau to illustrate a woman who is intelligent, brave, and resourceful, yet still a product of her time and background.

In 1957, Marie is also one of four daughters of Italian Catholic parents, married unhappily to Sid, and mother of four year old Cindy. Sid, himself a police officer, is generally considered to be good looking and charming, but he is also emotionally and physically abusive, a serial cheater, and venal. It was many years before divorce would be an option for Marie, and while she slowly gained some measure of respect in her workplace, she never gained the respect of her husband.

The Policewomen’s Bureau is an interesting and engaging read, both as a work of fiction, and for the truth it shares about women’s early experiences as serving police officers in the NYPD.

This is a fictionalization of the memoir of real life Policewoman Marie Cirile-Spagnuolo. The author is also a police officer, but of a different era and he knew Marie personally. While the subject matter of this book is very interesting, the writing is not very nuanced and very matter of fact. The story is really just a string of anecdotes. I think the original memoir, Detective Marie Cirile, is probably more interesting.

I was so excited to read this and just didn't believe some of the things were true in it. Doesn't matter if this as about a male or female, some of it just seemed to unbelievable.

I agree with other reviewers about this one. I loved the premise, but the result left me a little flat. The author's note at the beginning about what was true and what was invented didn't really clarify that boundary for me while I read. If anything, I found myself constantly debating whether scenes were true or fiction. Either a simple, "based on a true story" or a non-fiction account would have worked better for me. Didn't meet it's potential for me.

Not my cup of tea. It did not keep my attention and had trouble to keep on reading.
Many thanks to the publisher and Netgalley for this ARC, all opinions are mine.

Thanks to Netgalley and Skyhorse for an ARC of this book.

I am really disappointed to say that I did not like this. The blurb / premise of this had me really excited and I could not wait to start reading it but from about 10% in it started to completely lose me. It was such a shame. I can't pinpoint one thing that didn't work as everything had bits that niggled at me, the writing, the characters and the slightly less than believable plot line.. overall a disappointing read and not one that I would be quick to recommend.

I really wanted to love this book. The book description was amazing and I was excited to begin reading it but unfortunately the book did not live up to my expectations. It started strongly but as the story went on it began to lack believability and I struggled to finish it.

Thanks to the publishers and NetGalley for this ARC.

This just did not work for me. I had issues with the writing, the believability, and the plot itself. The premise is awesome, but the novel itself did not measure up.

So I absolutely loved the beginning of this . . . but then I am supposed to believe that she destroyed evidence and went on a game show? Perhaps these things are historically accurate, but they just don't work in a novel--at least without some explaining.