An interesting approach to exploring the world of superheroes through the lens of philosophy. It allows those who are beginners with either topics to be able to enjoy and understand what is on offer here.

Interesting comparisons of philosophy and superheroes but a bit dry. Also, I feel that it should’ve been edited a bit more because multiple things were basically repeatedly said but using different phrasing of the sentence.

When I was in college, I took a course about Star Trek and Philosophy. It was a great way to explore the types of problems that keep philosophers up at night. Referring to Trek episodes I knew and loved made those thought experiments more concrete then anything I had in Philosophy 101. Sometimes talking about switching a train track to kill 1 person in order to save 10 people comes across as an outdated example.

Nowadays, superheroes seem to be the dominant genre in pop culture, so it makes sense philosophers would try to engage people using examples drawn from the comics. I admit my knowledge of comic book superheroes comes mostly from the Marvel and DC films, so I can't comment on the accuracy of the comic trivia. However, I appreciated how - just like my undergrad Star Trek class - it made abstract philosophical disputes more concrete. It's also clear that the authors aren't just trying to use comic books to get kids interested in philosophy. Tying characters like Batman to Kant helped me appreciate the comics more, recognizing that they too are part of the exploration of the human condition.

I could easily see this book being used for introductory undergrad philosophy classes.

[Note: I received a copy of this book from the publisher in exchange for an honest review]

I’ve been intrigued by the focus of many academic books that are simply looking at the effect pop culture has on a population. That is one reason I requested to read this through NetGalley, and while it took me longer than I had planned to get to it, I thoroughly enjoyed reading this book.
The authors examine numerous comic book characters and story arcs against the philosophical theories of common and uncommon philosophers. Many of the philosophers I have studied, but even some I had not paid attention to before. Understanding the philosophical theories prior to reading the book didn't really affect the ability to read and understand because the authors explain their thought processes so well. The connections from early comics through modern iterations to different theories of ethics was intriguing and worth the read. Looking not only at the characters themselves as thought experiments but also the individual and collective authors, as well as the objective/selective point of ethical morals by the Comics Code Authority that influenced what could and could not be in comics until the 1980s was an interesting perspective that many readers, comic book readers, academics, and any other readers would find worthwhile to put a little time into reading this easy to follow, easy to understand, and easy to read book that makes a reader not only think about the morality represented in pop culture but also to consider their moral philosophy and how it is shaped.
Thank you NetGalley and publisher for the eARC of this work in exchange for my honest review.

I’m a big fan of books that use pop culture to take a closer look at philosophy. This not only makes the topic more accessible but it also leads to some great discussions. In this case, readers are treated to a philosophical examination of superheroes. The results were quite enjoyable. If you like comic books and have even a passing interest in philosophy, you’ll find much to like about Superhero Thought Experiments.

It’s Superman vs. Batman: consequentialism vs. deontology! Within these pages you will find this and other astounding speculations as our intrepid authors perform feats of daring philosophy.

Okay, this isn’t actually a high-action book, but if you enjoy philosophy it’s a lot of fun. Gavaler and Goldberg treat superhero comic as thought experiments to explore the nature of doing good, existence, time, identity, communication, etc. (or morality, metaphysics, meaning, and medium if you prefer the alliteration of their section titles). Fodder for philosophizing includes Bizarro world, Dr. Doom’s time machine, Scarlet Witch’s imaginary twins, retcons & reboots, and much more. To me, the first three sections that focus on characters and stories were much more interesting than the last section that focused on comic books as a medium.

If you’re the kind of person who when confronted with someone asking “how do I know I’m really here?” gets annoyed by anything more theoretical than pinching/punching them and asking “did that hurt,” this isn’t the book for you. If you enjoy thought experiments and speculating on the nature of life, the universe, and everything give this a shot.

A comic book blogger and a philosopher walk into a bar—actually they shared a college copier—and Superhero Thought Experiments was born. They have got to stop meeting like this...

What is the difference between philosophers’ thought experiments and comic book plots? Surprisingly little. Take this short quiz and select the real comic book plots.
1. “What if lightning struck a dead tree in a swamp and transformed it into The Swampman?”
2. “What if trying to travel to the past transported you to a different universe instead?”
3. “What if a time traveler returned to his childhood and told his past self about the future?”
4. “What if a mad scientist removed your brain and is keeping it alive in a vat?”
5. “What if you and all the universe were just the thoughts of a small child?”
Not as easy to distinguish as you thought, right?

The comic book plots are item number three and five (from 1975’s The Defenders and 1997’s Heroes Reborn: The Return, respectively). The rest were thought up by philosophers. The book’s “goal is to use superhero comics to illustrate philosophy, and in turn use philosophy to analyze superhero comics.” It does that by using the What If questions from above plus five more.

First up, for those of you partial just to DC or only to Marvel, both are used to illustrate the authors’ points.

It is hard to explain why I liked this book but let me try. I’ve only taken an introductory class in philosophy. My favorite philosopher is Kant, who basically believed if your intention is good, you are morally good regardless of any unintended consequences. According to this book, that is also the attitude of my favorite superhero, Batman. Coincidence or my subconscious mind looking for matching belief systems? Who knows but it is definitely thought-provoking.

I can totally see this book being a textbook for an introductory philosophy course. Conversely, if you liked your philosophy course and read comics, this is an engrossing book that will deepen your understanding of both. Finally, I believe any writer or fledgling writer of superhero comics must read Superhero Thought Experiments. It will encourage compelling plots that reflect enduring questions about the human condition. 4 stars!

Thanks to University of Iowa Press and NetGalley for a copy in exchange for my honest review.

Superhero Thought Experiments is an interesting work that looks critically at the stories in superhero comics, as seen through the lens of philosophical thought. Since each topic is explained at the start of each section, you don't have to have studied philosophy to read this book; however, I would suggest that having a basic overview of some major figures like Kant and Descartes would help, in particular in regards to terminology. Likewise, each comic plot is outlined, so you don't need to have read all the relevant comics to follow the lines of thought, but again, a basic knowledge of major DC and Marvel characters will benefit you. This is not what I would call a light read, but it is an intriguing one, and if you are a superhero fan, there'll be plenty to captivate you in these essays.