My apologies, but yes, it actually took me three years to read this book. Three. Years.

When I downloaded this book originally, I was a seminary student and was reading a lot of this type of really complex writing, though I wasn't particularly enjoying it. I have deep roots in the Restoration movement, and the notion of "Scripture First" really struck me. But when I picked up this book that wasn't REQUIRED reading (wasn't something I had to write a paper on or be prepared to discuss in a class setting), I really struggled with this.

To be honest, all I can think when I see a book like this is, "Lord, forgive us. Forgive us for doing this to Your Word." Because books like this aren't helpful to anyone who wants a practical engagement of what it means to live a faithful life. This type of book is only for someone who wants to throw ideas around and have high-brow-sounding conversations with others where they think they come off as intelligent, but actually are only pompous and convoluted. These books have zero practical application except in the case that one feels the inclination to tear the Scriptures apart to try to discover something they think the Holy Spirit won't make plain and obvious to them, as if we need some kind of human-brained academic assistance in deciphering God's inspired word.

Sorry, but we should repent of stuff like this. And it took this book to help me realize it. So I guess, at least, there is that.

The six contributors advocate an ongoing development of hermeneutics, based on their examination of Protestant approaches since the Reformation. They examine history of how the community of faith has approached, appropriated, and corrected theology and biblical interpretation from the 1500s. They point out that church as ultimate authority - influenced by history and culture - is as unworkable as individual interpretation, sola scripture without the interaction of other believers. They advocate for hermeneutics that consider creeds, baptism, the apostolic emphasis on resurrection, and other core developments in the life of Christ's body, the Church universal as well as new waves of culture and scholarship.

Well worth considering for those interested in the development of hermeneutics and the failure of the American Restoration Movement to include the global and emerging church in its interpretation of scripture.

As the churches of Christ wrestle with its inability to adapt to postmodernism, this collection of essays begins a conversation of the failure of Stone Campbell movement churches to unify the church through their back to the Bible as source of authority for the church and how opening eyes to a new interpretative lens can enhance the communal aspects of the faith. Tradition versus sola scriptura is examined in a credible academic environment.

My only worry is that this highly academic examination will be difficult for the average layperson to decifer. We need a follow up book oriented towards non academics.


thank you to Abilene Christian University Press for the ARC to read and review.

This collection of essays written by scholars in the Stone-Campbell movement is a must read for those who have or are wrestling with the hermeneutics and non-creedal stance of the movement. Rather than abandoning the Stone-Campbell heritage, these scholars provide a way forward for a better engagement with Scripture. From finding early traditions being reimagined in new places in the OT (Daniel B. Oden) to the use of apostolic proclamation as a lens for scriptural interpretation (J. David Stark), the first two essay root the thrust of the work in a firm scriptural foundation.

The second pair of essays looks to find an acceptable theological guideline for interpretation. Keith D. Stanglin argues for the use of the rule of faith and opens up the possibility of Campbell's own acceptance of the Apostles' Creed as the basis for a theologically informed interpretation. Stephen D. Lawson's essay provides a much needed re-look at the Campbellite theology of history and the use of primitivism.

The final pair of essays finish this hermeneutical revision by first arguing for baptism as a theological event that can form scriptural interpretation. Scott Adair's theological vision of baptism may lay to rest any unease at the use of early creeds or things that looking like creeds for some staunch members of the movement as he finds within baptism a nearly full affirmation of the content of the apostles creed, and that content being rooted in Scripture. Lauren Smelser White's essay finishes this book with a needed argument concerning the attachment of the movement to the Reformation's idea of Sola Scriptura.

This wide ranging set of essays is a gift to the Stone-Campbell movement. However, it may be found inaccessible to some, especially those without strong command of biblical languages in the first two essays, or knowledge of systematic theology in White's essays. These are not detriments to the scholarship. Indeed, the deep engagement with the text and other protestant theologians should be marks of Stone-Campbell scholarship. However, some of those who might benefit most from this work may not find it accessible, as those dealing often with the academic study, in my experience, are more open to the inherent problems and needed solutions of Stone-Campbell hermeneutics.

Interesting Discussion. This is a collection of six academic essays, mostly seemingly from the same basic starting viewpoint of a particular line of academic thought in a particular realm of a particular Christian denomination. So a reader not necessarily steeped in that exact line of thinking may find this a bit more dense than others, but I actually fit exactly that mold (of not being particularly knowledgeable of the intricacies of this viewpoint), and I found the discussions to be interesting if not particularly illuminating in the ways I had hoped. (For reference, I was approaching this more from being a fan of Frank Viola's Pagan Christianity and as someone who has thought and discussed much within Southern and Independent Baptist circles on the issue at hand - whether Scripture truly is the basis of Christian thought or whether the various traditions have any import whatsoever.) Ultimately this really was an interesting and informative read particularly well suited for anyone with any form of academic interest in Christian theology and practice. Very much recommended.

This is a curated selection of six (6) academic essays from the Stone-Campbell Restoration tradition that tries to re-examine how and why the moment failed to bring about the Christian unity it was looking for. Having grown up within the Disciples of Christ wing of this movement, I came to this book with a certain perspective that colors how I understood the material.

1. Creedal Expressions and Their Development in the Hebrew Bible: One of the tenants of the Restoration movement is that scripture should be read without the "lens" of creeds or traditions which was thought to have contributed to erroneous interpretations. The problem with that approach comes from the fact that "the canon of scripture has come to us through and within community - through the same community that also preserved tradition." In other words, we all use some form of a "lens" to interpret what we read ... and we can find examples of such [proto-creedal concepts] used within scripture itself.

2. Understanding Scripture through the Apostolic Proclamation: I struggled with this material ... as it was way more academic that I was prepared for. The author explores some of the theology of Paul and how he views sin, death and the resurrection. I did pick up a few gems here, but for most of it I was fighting to finish it (and I am sure I didn't understand most of it).

3. Ecclesial Unity, Biblical Interpretation, and the Rule of Faith: Perhaps to must accessible of the six for me, I got quite a bit out of this essay that explored how divisive creeds and tradition could become after centuries of accretions and inculturation. This paper explores how these divisions/schisms exploded in the 16th century and has continued apace since then. In an attempt to restore unity within and between Christian confessions, the American Restoration movement tried to return to traditions found within the "primitive" church and build upon sola scriptura with limited success. Unfortunately, by rejecting the accumulated body of tradition and creeds, the "flattening of Scripture" has the effect of making each element of faith as important as another despite an obvious hierarchy. There is obviously a tension here when defining the correct Rule of Faith to foster a "properly Christian lens" through which to interpret Scripture while maintaining unity.

4. Resisting the Primitivist Temptation: The Restoration movement seeks to return to the "primitive" church; but how far back do you go? And what do you do with all of the competing "primitive" churches that were competing within the early church? Unfortunately, without any reference to creed or tradition, what you eventually get is a "pristine, primitive church remade into the image of the seeker." Perhaps the greatest flaw with primitivism is the narrative that requires a "falling away" from perfect original. The author here counters with an observation that "the truth arrives through time" indicating that our understanding of "main event" took centuries to figure out. This essay is a good follow on from the previous essay and more clearly outlines the problems encountered with this approach.

5. Reading Scripture Baptismally: After a quick review of what baptism is/means, the author then lays out how to use baptism (and the submission to Christ) to interpret scripture by outlining six(6) ways to shift our perspective: pyramid, gospel, Passover, Jordan, fingers and ones ... interesting, but probably not universally efficacious.

6. Beyond Sola Scriptura: An Expanded View of the Textual Inspiration: This essay covers a rough outline of how Protestants have historically used sola scriptura before recommending a way forward using a process more "oriented by communal reflection upon Scripture." The process of discerning meaning through the "experiences of diverse people and the narrative of those experiences" is key; however, in doing so, we must acknowledge something of an iterative approach that is "something akin to a trail-and-error, hit-or-miss strategy."

I was given this free advance reader copy (ARC) ebook at my request and have voluntarily left this review.
#ScriptureFirst #NetGalley