Everyone should read this book. In a careful, well constructed and well written way, the author shines a light on what has become only too clear in recent years - the systemic abuse of children perpetuated by those who were supposed to protect them. These are not new issues and the author insists that we acknowledge this fact. A very important reflection on institutionalised violence.

The world has been scandalized throughout the 21st century by the revelations regarding persistent clerical sexual abuse in the Roman Catholic Church along with all of its actions attempting to cover it up. Many try to claim the problem is a modern phenomenon; many more wonder how the organization could do such things and make such decisions. This book thoroughly demonstrates the long-running nature of the difficulty of clerical sexual abuse and all of the late antique and medieval decisions which have led to the current institutional crisis.

The author covers the period from late antiquity through the medieval period and relies on primary source data to explore how clerical sexual abuse became so prevalent and how it was so often covered up. The reasoning for clerical celibacy is explored: the defilement and denigration of sex and the exaltation of the virtue of celibacy. The author also explores attitudes toward pederasty in late antiquity and shows convincingly how the practice was not frowned upon as much as might be imagined. The ability to receive and maintain sinners in the church in the Augustine vs. Donatists disputation is explored, and its unfortunate consequences of emphasizing the sanctity of the position over the quality of the character. The author speaks of the authors of canon law and their concern about scandal - the desire to not cause greater difficulty by having iniquity exposed and thus cause other souls to be scandalized, and thus the desire for discretion. The final piece involves priests getting absolution from Confession and the inability of the Confessor to expose any sin confessed in that context.

All of this comes together and is shown to cause all kinds of issues in the medieval church: canon law very strongly emphasized and focused on the scandal of clerical concubinage since such often led to pregnancies and thus public scandal. So much emphasis was made on keeping women away from the clerics that what clerics did among one another, and with younger boys in their care, is comparatively passed over with lesser concern. A few voices, like Peter Damian, did attack and go after the sodomitical practices among the clerics; the author does well at showing how many authors projected sodomitical concerns on the secular rulers. On the whole, however, the goal was to keep it as silent as possible, and to move people around if they started causing problems. The goal was to eliminate causes of scandal; charges of sodomy tended to arise only to help reinforce other charges and to indict someone in trouble for other reasons, and rarely was addressed in its own right.

The author does the best job possible in light of how little evidence remains, and how much of the evidence that remains relies on obfuscation and a desire to not be explicit in order to, again, not cause scandal. That kind of "discretion" allows others to cast aspersions and doubt on what is being discussed.

But this work does an extremely good job of showing that the current challenges of the Roman Catholic Church are not new, and the institutional failure all but guaranteed based upon all of these ancient and medieval precedents in how the church thinks it should run itself.

The sharpest possible indictment of the Roman Catholic Church's historical impetus to preserve its own reputation over the well being of those victimized by its agents, and the best possible argument for releasing clerics from celibacy.

This is an historical treatise on the use of boys as sex partners by clergy in the Catholic Church. It is ALL about the olden days and covers subjects such as the church's deliberation over whether priests should marry, and if not, what to do to sublimate the sexual life. It is well written and has thorough references. It is all about the very long history of these practices and does not address the recent 20th - 21st century crises.
One third of the book is the very long reference section. I'm not sure a reader would be thrilled with that.

This is a difficult topic to read and discuss. The Catholic Church has been complicit on covering up the misbehavior of priests for far too long. The author pulls back the curtain on misdeeds going back centuries. Can the church make reparations for the harm it’s caused? Probably not. Can it move forward and take responsibility for the mismanagement of its failed clergy? It must if the church is to survive.