This was a DNF. I started this as an audiobook three different times, and each listen only lasted an hour and a half to two hours into a 20 hour story. The main reason that I DNFed this book is that every time I started this book I couldn’t remember anything I had already listened to. This is because so much of this book is telling not showing. At least in the beginning there is so much set up for who the characters are what they’re doing, etc. It’s almost never ending. Even now, though I have listened to those first two hours multiple times I still cannot tell you anything that happened. I’m not saying this book was bad I’m just saying it wasn’t for me as an audiobook.

Trigger warnings: slavery, blood magic

This historical fantasy takes place in the late 1700s after "the war with the Americas" or the Revolutionary War. The people and places involved are far-reaching, including England, France, Jamaica, and Haiti. Historical figures such as Robespierre and Marie Antoinette (a fire mage) make appearances in the novel.

In this world, royalty and aristocrats are allowed the use of their magic while commoners are restricted from using any abilities they are born with. Slavery is perpetuated in Jamaica by magically binding the slaves to be obedient. Bracelets are used on the common people to cause them pain when using magic. Africa and parts of the Middle East have no restrictions on magic.

Magic comes in many forms -- fire magic, telekinesis, necromancy, weather magic, mesmerism, alchemy, shadowmancy, and blood magic/vampirism. Here (like many other historical franchises) the Templars are the enemy; they are the force that takes down commoners illegally using magic.

Even though magic is rampant, there are branches of it that aren't as well understood. Shadows aren't understood even by the shadowmancers that summon shadows and can detect them. Babies with latent ability in blood magic are put down at birth to prevent unnatural magic. These magicians were known as vampires and were eradicated in previous centuries.

The story is told from three perspectives -- English aristocrat (and prime minister) William Pitt, Haitian slave Fina, and French revolutionary Maximilien Robespierre. Robespierre and Pitt are historical figures and Fina is fictional.

Andrew Kingston is a fantastic narrator, adeptly switching flawless accents and injecting the appropriate amount of emotion into the story. His narration is probably the only reason I made it all the way through.

The world-building is rich and interesting, but the plot of the novel isn't as gripping. Much of the novel revolves around the politics of the regulation of magic and slavery. The title points to the eventual declaration, so readers know what kind of story they're getting.

The novel is overlong, digging into the minutiae of magical politics when glossing over it could have told the same story.

Recommended for hardcore fans of magical tales, especially historical fantasy.

There's a few different reasons for this outcome: our main characters (on the English front) are two politicians who just... Talk all the time. All the time. We don't actually see them doing anything worthwhile apart from one scene with a Shadow. But at this point in the story we know absolutely nothing about how magic works, how many different kinds of magic there are, what limits there are on people's abilities (in the magical sense, not the legal sense), how prevalent magical abilities are in society (ie we know Wilberforce doesn't have magic in his family but we don't have even a sense of how many magical vs nonmagical families there are). And did I mention that all they do is TALK?

I was very interested in the idea of uprisings in Haiti and among enslaved populations, but we've only seen the barest hints of that (and the French Revolution) so far - just enough to say "hey, I have actual interesting ideas coming but you have to slog through Pitt and Wilberforce for a long while yet before you get there" and ugh I was so tired of our English politicians.

I think this is on of those books that is really cool in theory but without a lot more specifics on magic and how it works as well as actually bringing the more interesting points to bear early enough to keep our attention would have done much more to keep me going. I also would have wanted different narrators for the different sections of the audiobook, to make the transitions a little more obvious when we do finally leave the Englishmen behind.

Unfortunately, I did not finish this book because I wasn’t connecting to the characters or the story at all, and I began to dread the moments I would press play on the audiobook. I debated for two whole weeks if I should push myself through or not, but ultimately I decided to just quit because of my lack of enjoyment. Although this book was not for me, I feel that this would be the perfect book for the right audience.

A Declaration of the Rights of Magicians is a historical fantasy, and fans of that genre will likely enjoy this book. While I love fantasy, I struggle with historical narratives, and this book was much more historical than I expected it to be; it’s very rich in both history and culture. It almost feels like it could be a nonfiction story if only magic had been real.

Set in the late 1700s, this book tackles civil rights and revolution. The story starts out following a common man who uses magic and is put on trial and jailed for using magic since commoners are not allowed to use magic, and this is the basis for the story. Magicians want different rights for the use of their magic, thus the title.

There are a few perspectives here. The main story follows a vampire and his friend in England, but we also have the POV of a slave girl from Jamaica. I didn’t read far enough to hear much about the girl, but her story goes hand in hand with the main storyline as some magicians are working to abolish slavery while they fight for the rules regarding the use of magic to be changed.

I thought the discussion about magic in this book was actually pretty cool. The commoners are forced to wear bracelets that prevent them from using magic, but of course some higher class magicians think this is wrong and want change. There are a few different types of magicians in this book too, and my favorite part was that that blood magician was actually a vampire. Because consuming blood is how he got his magic to work.

If heavily historical novels with lots of politics and moral discussions and magic are your cup of tea, then I encourage you to give this book a go.

I feel like I could potentially enjoy A Declaration of the Rights of Magicians at a different time in my life, and I hope eventually I will be willing to pick it up again and finish it. I do know, however, that I would get a lot more out of it and feel more connected to it reading it with my eyes, so I can say with certainty that if I were to come back to this story, I would not be continuing the audiobook. The narrator had a nice voice and I feel that he adequately portrayed the characters and the story, but something about either him or this book just wasn’t letting me grasp what was going on while listening to it. So maybe if you want to give it a shot try reading it instead? Even though this book wasn’t exactly my thing, I still want to read The Unlikely Escape of Uriah Heep by H. G. Parry, and I would definitely consider reading other novels from her in the future too.

My thanks to Hachette Audio for a review copy of the audiobook edition, via NetGalley, of ‘A Declaration of the Rights of Magicians’ by H. G. Parry in exchange for an honest review. It is read by Andrew Kingston and has a running time of 20 hours, 54 minutes at 1x speed.

I had first read this novel in June and rated it 5 stars. I would have gladly given more if I could. I noted at the time that I would love to revisit via an audiobook edition. In respect of the novel in general, I quote from my original review posted to NetGalley and elsewhere.

“This is the first in Parry’s Shadow Histories duology. In her Acknowledgements she writes: “This book is a mythologization of the real history of Britain, France, and Haiti in the eighteenth century, which is more interesting and dramatic and downright weird than anything I could make up.”

Clearly the title references the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen of 1789. It is an epic reimagining of this turbulent period of European history as in addition to the social issues of the time those born with magical powers are strictly controlled by the State through various means.

France is on the verge of Revolution fired up by Maximilien Robespierre and Camille Desmoulins. In Great Britain the new Prime Minister William Pitt is worried about events across the channel while joining with his friend William Wilberforce to seek the abolition of the slave trade.

In the French controlled colony of Saint-Domingue (now Haiti), the weather mage Toussaint L'Ouverture leads the slaves in their fight for freedom and establishes the Republic of Magicians. He is aided by Fina, a young African girl who had escaped from slavery in Jamaica and fled to Saint-Domingue. Fina has unique magical gifts.

This is the kind of work of historical fiction that I adore. Parry has clearly deeply researched the history of the period and then added magic, vampires, and the like. Simply brilliant!

In some instances it was only tweaking history as the role played by practitioners of Vodou in the Saint-Domingue slave revolution of 1793 has been well documented and esoteric philosophy had played a significant role in establishing the Age of Enlightenment; though in the novel this has been translated to more overt magical practices.

It is a long novel with a great deal of serious political discourse alongside its magical and supernatural themes. Given its focus upon those who had passionately campaigned for the abolition of slavery, it is also a timely one.

I certainly appreciated Parry’s skill in blending these themes and bringing historical figures and the period vividly to life. I found it a well written, intelligent novel.

I would have welcomed more chapters focusing on the events on Saint-Domingue. However, as the novel closes in July of 1794 with the conclusion of the Reign of Terror in France there is plenty of unrest in the Caribbean into the early nineteenth century to inform the final volume.

While the time period and blend of history and magic was bound to draw comparisons with Susanna Clarke’s wonderful magical alternative history, ‘Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell’, which based on her guinea pigs’ names is likely a favourite of the author, I feel that ‘A Declaration of the Rights of Magicians’ stands on its own merits and is an impressive work of historical fantasy incorporating much actual, rather than alternative, history.

Very highly recommended.”

In terms of the audiobook edition, it’s admittedly long, with a large cast of characters including many historical figures and a great deal of dialogue. While I was not familiar with Andrew Kingston’s previous work I felt that the richness and clarity of his voice was excellent and provided me with a deeper appreciation of the novel.

I am a big fan of combining reading with listening via audiobook and I feel that a complex, multi-strand novel such as this is well served by approaching in this way as an immersive experience.

The second book in the Shadow Histories, ‘A Radical Act of Magic’, is listed for publication in July 2021 and I can hardly wait.

Audio arc received via NetGalley in exchange for an honest review

Audio review first: I liked the narrator. He brought out the characters well and was pleasant to listen to. Perhaps I'm imagining it, but it felt as if he wasn't desperately interested in some of the large bodies of prose in between dialogue. That could just be my perception of course and didn't detract from a sterling performance.

And on to the book. It would be easy, since this is another large tome of alternate historical fantasy where magic is added to the Eighteenth Century, to compare this book to Jonathan Strange and Mr Norell. It's certainly likely to appeal to a similar audience. However, Parry's ambition historical fantasy is set as much in France and the West Indies as in England. Against the backdrop of the abolitionist movement against slavery, the French Revolution and the struggle for greater rights for commoners in England, Declaration uses the inclusion of magic to examine this complicated political and violent time. Fair warning this is a slow burn story that meditates far more on politics than it examines magic. The point, I think, is that anyone can have magic (for magic read personal power, aptitude and ability) but only upper classes are alllowed to use it; only approved magical ability is permitted - if your bloodline comes from a dark magic background, chances are you'll be euthanised at birth or 'braceleted'; and over seeing all this are the Knight Templar - a stand in for the Church (which was very hand in glove with both politics and slavery in 18th C.)

Overall, I really enjoyed this book despite expecting a much lighter, more action packed fantasy. I enjoyed what Parry did with characters such as William Wilberforce, William Pit (both of whom I already knew a fair bit about) and Robespierre. I think the story relies on the reader either already knowing a bit about the time period and the big events or relies on them being willing to find out. Naturally the French revolution, the slave trade and the class discontent was far more complicated than this but Parry does a good job of making it accessible without dumbing it down too much. There's plenty of character development and everyone acts with good reason. The magic system is interesting if a little sparsely described - mostly it's just hitched onto historical record and I confess that I would have liked a little more. However, this was entertaining and informative and I especially enjoyed Wilberforce and Pit's friendship. Highly recommend.

A Declaration Of The Rights Of Magicians By H.G. Parry
This review I am going to do that thing I don't normally do. I'm going to provide the summary, for both our sake. I need to ensure that I do A Declaration of the Rights of Magicians and its creator, H.G. Parry every due it deserves (including you having a solid summary of what it is about), and that you understand that I am taking every precaution to not spoil ANYTHING. The temptation to spoil so many things is so high that I feel like a fiend shaking with the need to unleash all the magnificent things. But I can't. And I won't.
I have, actually set a percentage. I will NOT mention any specific events, reveals etc. past 100 pages. Those are all safe. Generalities that are not spoilery, of course I will speak to because that's how I have always review books. But I don't deal in spoilers and will continue not to. So, in order to abide by these two principals. I will provide the summary.
________________________________________
Buddy Reads Co-Hosting With Becky @CrookBooks
I quit. I give and wave the white flag. Apparently, for whatever reason, Becky is not yet sick of me. I don't have an explanation for it. We just keep finding books to read together. Forest of Souls is next. Forest of Souls is next. With Witches Steeped In Gold and, I think Gilded Ones, we already have buddy reads for next year?! Maybe I'm imagining that, but I don't think so. At this point I figure she's just co-hosting my site. So, there's that. You know. Like a podcast. Co-hosting, with Becky. And so welcome to Becky co-hosting my read and review of A Declaration of the Rights of Magicians by H.G. Parry (her review is linked above). And it is a good thing to have a co-host because you know me...


________________________________________
A Declaration Of The Rights Of Magicians By H.G. Parry- Goodreads Summary:
A sweeping tale of revolution and wonder in a world not quite like our own, A Declaration of the Rights of Magicians is a genre-defying story of magic, war, and the struggle for freedom in the early modern world.
It is the Age of Enlightenment -- of new and magical political movements, from the necromancer Robespierre calling for revolution in France to the weather mage Toussaint L'Ouverture leading the slaves of Haiti in their fight for freedom, to the bold new Prime Minister William Pitt weighing the legalization of magic amongst commoners in Britain and abolition throughout its colonies overseas. But amidst all of the upheaval of the early modern world, there is an unknown force inciting all of human civilization into violent conflict. And it will require the combined efforts of revolutionaries, magicians, and abolitionists to unmask this hidden enemy before the whole world falls to darkness and chaos.
I hope this will serve to comfort you as you go forth that
1. You have a solid grip as to what A Deceleration of the Rights of Magicians is about (although really that isn't at all a fair warning)
2. I am not giving away any major, specific spoilers, as always. This is my oath by this website. I don't unless noted and warning given. And this is not one of those times.
________________________________________
Upfront Disclaimers
DO NOT. LET ME REPEAT. DO NOT. DO NOT SLAM THIS BOOK DOWN OR TRY TO SLAM THIS BOOK DOWN IN A DAY. Most readers, I imagine will read that sentence and think, is this a thing? I speak, mostly to other reviewers out there, truly. This is not a book you can pick up and expect to just throw back in a day. It is dense, but definitely not in a bad way. Anyone who has been around my site longs enough knows that I am diagnosed and medicated for ADD. I can't deal with twenty pages to describe a tree. I can't handle overly descriptive, lack of action type books (see 800-page Adult Fantasy books). A Declaration of the Rights of Magicians is NOT THAT BOOK.

Thank You to Orbit for an ARC in exchange for an honest review.
What I mean is that H.G. Parry is working with a lot of material (specifics coming later). To rush through it would be a sin. Not only is Parry working with a lot of material, but she is working with it masterfully. To rush through it as a reader would not only contribute to you missing the intricate blending on her craftsmanship, but it would be completely overwhelming and you would end up either stopping altogether or walking away with a negative view of an exquisite work.
Second, do you have to be a history geek to enjoy A Declaration of the Rights of Magicians? No. You don't even have to love history. I would imagine not having a vitriol hatred of history to be helpful. Outside of Kiersten White (And I Darken and Guinevere Deception), I haven't read a lot of Alternative History because it tends to veer into the romantic. This does not. What it does do is align to the events leading up to and during the French Revolution with brilliant accuracy (with magic, of course). But you don't need to know any of that to enjoy it.
________________________________________
About This Alternative History Thing...
The bulk of my historical curiosities and my minor in America History surrounded the American Revolution. There is overlap there between Jefferson, Lafayette and the French Revolution. I will say that I was surprised and a bit disappointed that they didn't make an appearance in A Declaration of the Rights of Magicians. I'm sure Parry had her reasons for this, and it is nitpicking to bringing it up. I mean hell, the title is taken from the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen.
I only bring it up because Parry sticks to the history of that time period with such meticulous accuracy that it is mind-blowing. It isn't just the historical figures, times or places. Beyond that, it goes right down to the speeches (I'll go further into that in the questions below), documents, events and how one dominoes into the other. It is completely and utterly mind-blowing.
When I first spoke of this to Becky, I called it code-switching but that isn't really the right term. Through my educational lens that made the most sense as a vehicle to explain what I meant. Parry effortlessly and expertly switches between the correct vernaculars and dialects in correlation to that that time period, and each location with ease. This makes it even more authentic and incredible to read. She truly wrote those pieces as a historian, in my opinion.
What makes this alternative history, the one thing that makes A Declaration of the Rights of Magicians, alternative? Is the incredible magic system that is interwoven throughout this entire time period. A period pitting aristocrats vs. commoners that designs to bring about the rights of commoners, the fight of abolitionists and a removal of a monarch.
________________________________________
Magic+Politics...

________________________________________
Captain obvious much? I mean what is the one thing that could make politics any messier than magic... let alone dark magic? Especially during one of the bloodiest, nastiest revolutions (yes, including the American Revolution- at least they had George Washington to fall back on as President and a semblance of government in place), to boot. The French? They had nothing. And then rebooted, restarted and rebooted again. There were councils and committees, but at no point was the country really ever on the same page. It was a MESS.
The brain of the Revolution, Maximilien Robespierre and his best friend, who "lit" the fire of the Revolution, Camille Desmoulins are a mesmerer and a shadowmancer. However, Camille has always been "spellbound" by a bracelet on his wrist that prevents him, a commoner, from utilizing his magic. Robespierre's vision is a France where commoners are as free as Aristocrats to utilize their magic.
On the other side of the channel, William Pitt, youngest Prime Minister in history, is fighting with the breaking of spellbound magic for a whole different reason- abolishing slavery. If the moral atrocities aren't enough to bring everyone to end it, the physical proof of its horrific abomination, surely will be. Using spellbound magic, slaves are kept underfoot going long past their mind's and body's actual abilities, literally working themselves to death in a matter of years.
Pitt and William Wilberforce, along with the evidence of the atrocities slaves suffered brought by Thomas Carter, were fighting to bring an end to this hideous practice.
________________________________________
Men Become What They Fear Most
Nothing worth having is ever easy. Try to take the short-cut or the easy way and you are likely to make a mess of it all. It might seem, at the time to be the perfect solution. It rarely is. And man, in its ignorant genius, often becomes everything they hate, everything they try not to defend against. They want peace, they go to war. You want to defeat mortality. Have children. Someday I'll get through a review without quoting Marvel. Probably not. But most of what I just said is not only true long before Marvel but was also the basis of the MCU and summarized in Age of Ultron. It is why Tony Stark couldn't be trusted to create a super bot... a suit of armor around the world (Don't bring up Endgame, not the point).
Everything Stark feared, he put into Ultron. He went too far. Magic, technology? Same thing. Same result. You take something you don't understand, and you mix it with politics? It won't end well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0Z-efARwhg
Nothing and no one is beyond this idea. You have a vision you believe to be correct and then become so fearful of losing it that you start doing all the wrong things, become paranoid and cutting out those that you trusted above all, your voice of reason. And nothing good comes of that. Especially when someone, or something is there to play on those fears, the anger, the desire. And is willing to handle it all. For a very, tiny price.
It is never small. It is never tiny. And nothing good ever comes of it. So, when a dark figure comes to Robespierre and offers him support in bringing his version of France to fruition by awakening weak magic in his blood? Robespierre jumps at the chance, for France, of course.
________________________________________
William Pitt
Things you don't expect in Alternative History for 300, Alex.
Dark Magic running through the Prime Minister's bloodlines.
I'm gonna leave that there and move on.
Because I'm mean. And because I promised not to spoil anything.
________________________________________
Wrapping Up With Some Thoughts
1. The pacing is fantastic. Again, just don't rush it. That's all I'm gonna say there. This book, in fact is so good, that I believe I'm going to buy the audible to "reread" (as long as the narrator is good) because, yeah.
2. The Holmes and Watson dynamics between Wilberforce and Pitt is brilliant, heartwarming and just hysterical.
3. To expand on the above-- there are MANY parts of this book that are just dead-pan funny and its perfect.
4. The main characters, the side characters, are well flushed out through dialogue and action. As aligned to history as A Declaration of the Rights of Magicians is, H.G. Parry never just sits back and rest on it. The world, the characters, and the events are vividly painted without ever being overdone.

Lastly, and as generally as possible... I keep mentioning dark magic, blood magic... if you put two and two together... there are well... just put those things together in your head and well... IT IS A PARTY!

I HOPE YOU LOVE THIS BOOK AS MUCH AS WE DID... on to the QUESTIONS
________________________________________
What other historical period would you like to be written to include magic?
I can't believe we both have Ring Shout on our TBR...
The American Revolution, without a doubt. I kept hoping America's debate on whether to join the French Revolution would somehow show up in here, but it didn't. That is just a preference thing, not a knock.
________________________________________
Do you think the inclusion of magic would fix 2020?
Short cuts never worked. And people confuse power for peace... for Covid? God I'd hope so- for everything else? It could too easily get into the wrong hands and be used to make everything much worst. And that is 2020's brand.
________________________________________
Did you go into this book knowing about the historical period? And did that affect your reading/enjoyment in any way?
I know more about the American Revolution, than the French Revolution to recognize when names and actual speeches were being utilized. I also knew dates, events etc. So, I guess I knew a bit. The French Revolution isn't why I chose this book. I like revolutions in general. I'm that type of person, I suppose. It definitely didn't hurt.
________________________________________
Favorite Quotes
I laughed when Becky said- can I do multiple quotes- sure cause I'm gonna give you a speech from Prime Minister, William Pitt:
I find it difficult, personally, to see evidence that the people of Africa are uniquely susceptible to dark magic in the fact that they are bound by a spell designed to bind them. One point cannot be denied: Africa does not have Europe's great cities, nor her libraries, nor her technological advantages. But think of this. Why might some Roman senator, reasoning on the same principles, and pointing to British barbarians, have predicted with the equal boldness, 'There is a people that will never rise to civilization- there is a people destined never to be free- a people without the necessary understanding for the attainment of useful arts, and created to form a supply of slaves for the rest of the world.' Might this not have been said as truly of Britain herself as can now be said by us of the inhabitants of Africa?
We may live to behold the natives of Africa engaged in the calm occupations of industry, in the pursuits of a just and legitimate commerce. We may behold the beams of science and philosophy breaking in upon their land, which, at some happy period in still later times, may blaze with full luster. Then may we hope that Africa, though last of all the quarters of the globe, shall enjoy at length, in the evening of her days, those blessings which have descended upon us in a much earlier period of the world.
(Part of the original speech: Mr. William Pitt on the Abolition of the Slave Trade, delivered to the House of Commons April 2, 1792)