Member Reviews

i enjoyed that this historical fiction book introduced me to something that I hadn't heard of before. The author wrote this perfectly and it kept me invested.

Was this review helpful?

This was a very interesting story about an interracial romance! I loved Elizabeth’s story and found her to be a strong woman! This is a little known story that must be read!

Was this review helpful?

Elisabeth's Wish

A novel drenched in history, colored with the tropical scenes and customs of Surname in the 1700's. A story of white Colonists with coffee and sugar plantations and the black slaves that worked them. Of the freed slaves, those born free to freed parents and those freed by purchase. The runaway slaves that formed their own colonies called the Maroons that went on to attack the plantations of the white owners are constantly a threat.

The story is based on a true story and it is about a freed black woman named Elisabeth Samson. She owns a coffee plantation, lives with Carl Otto, a white Colonel in the military and has a pet monkey named Pansu.

Elisabeth's most ardent wish is that she could marry a white man. The laws in Surname say that white men may not marry black women. She wishes to change that law and it is her one wish that she works on for many years.

The story is of the families in this colony, those of the plantation owners, and those of the slaves related to Elisabeth Samson. The lawmakers, the policy changers and the rule of Surname by the Dutch. It is about the politics in that time. It is also about the injustices against Elisabeth simply because she is a black woman and how she fights against it. Although she fights the prejudice against her person, she owns a plantation with her own slaves.

It's a very different time and place in history. I enjoyed the fashions, the food, the people and the furnishing of the homes. The descriptions of the land and the homes built on it. It was like transporting oneself into this place in this time period. The celebrations, the balls and ball gowns were very enchanting. I loved the scene of the tent boats floating down the river and the large fans, held by the slaves fanning the plantation owners. I could picture all this and it was all very colorful.

I did enjoy reading this story and learning of the history and color of this small country. I would recommend this book.

Thanks to C.V. Hamilton, BooksGoSocial, and NetGalley for allowing me to read a complimentary copy for my honest review.

Was this review helpful?

It was after a summer of Black Lives Matters protests all over the world in the midst of a pandemic that I was given the opportunity to review
Elisabeth Samson, Forbidden Bride
Based on the true story of the first black woman in 18th century Suriname to get legal permission to marry white.
by C V. Hamilton

Surinam or in Dutch Suriname was a Dutch colony in the north of South America. While in European Holland slavery was outlawed and apparently there was not a problem when people of different skincolours wanted to marry (The country had not that long ago fought a war of independence over freedom of religion), the colony was ruled under a different set of rules. Those rules were stipulated by the first governor and it felt to me like the whole area was ruled like it was a company.

One of those rules stipulated that everyone was allowed to marry everyone apart from people with not a drop of white blood in them. They were forbidden to marry white. That resulted in many people having a common law girlfriend boyfriend relationship.

Elisabeth is not a slave. She is a free woman and she comes from a very rich family. She owns her own plantations and companies. Yes she owns her own slaves!

From someone from an oppressed minority I was expecting goodwill towards her fellow blacks. She however has none. For her slavery is as normal as it is for the white people in the country. It even goes that far that when one of her familymembers hits financial rock-bottom they make him a slave reasoning that then people will take care of someone who is too stupid to do it for himself.

The cruelty towards the slaves in widely pictured and that made me so dislike Elisabeth. But mine are 21st century eyes. In those days things were regarded normal. Enlightenment and human rights were a thing of the distant future. The fact that the Marrons, the run away slaves, were cruel too would not have helped either.

So we have very rich Elisabeth who is black. She has a lover who is a German army officer serving in Paramaribo who she loves very much. But whoever she petitions whatever money she pays their marriage stays forbidden. So she even goes to Holland to take it to court.

So Elisabeth uses her money and takes the government to court. She keeps at it because she insists to be treated the same as all other rich planters. Yes first it is love but later on in her life I could not rid myself of the feeling that it was just prestige that kept her going.

Remember the king of the Jungle in Jungle Book who sings "I want to be like youhooohooo. To walk like you, talk like you dooohooohooo." Well that was the impression I got of her in the second half of the book.

Towards the end I found the book getting a bit of a chore. But that often happens with stories based on real lives. An author cannot invent thrilling moments. However I thought it a very interesting insight in my country's history. For a lawyer the legal issues are also interesting to read about. The author has a nice writing style. I am not sure if the introduction part of doing research is based on real life facts or just a literary plot.

I can recommend the story. Four stars out of 5.

Was this review helpful?

Elisabeth Samson is a black free woman. She lives in The Dutch, and wants to marry her significant other, who happens to be a white man, which is illegal. The tagline is that she is the first one to change the laws in order to make that happen. I may have had a misunderstanding of the story, but the book didn't focus on that like I thought it would. Parts of that was placed in the story, but I had thought it would be more prominent in the story than it did. Some parts were a little more enjoyable and interesting.

I received a copy of the book via NetGalley and am voluntarily leaving an honest review

Was this review helpful?

This is a book that sounded interesting from the description - although there were some issues I had with it, such as this woman proudly proclaiming her wealth (which was measured in slaves), like it was some sort of an achievement rather than a shame. Given that she was the daughter of a woman who had been a slave you might have expected some empathy there, but I read none in this novel based on the life of this woman who lived in the latter half of the eighteenth century.

The book is first person which is almost never a good voice, and in this case it makes the main character seem even more self-centered and self-absorbed than she would have in third person. Additionally, the novel is too Americanized, has too modern of a sensibility, and a total lack of empathy for the slaves this 'wealthy' woman owned.

As you might guess from the title and the description, the book was far more about her romance than ever it was about the ethics of what she was doing with that life. I had hoped for better. I'd decided to give it a try and see what the author had done with it, but quite quickly discovered that I was not pleased. The story is truly humdrum and offers little in the way of interest - at least not for me.

It’s of a woman who might have been a fine business woman, but who apparently has the ethics and integrity of a Donald Trump - someone who I hope to never read about again after January 20th. For example, I had multiple problems with this part: "At nineteen, I myself already owned the coffee plantation Welgemoed, which is doing quite well, along with two hundred slaves which are my own personal property, not the plantation’s. A sense of well-being touched me when I thought of Welgemoed."

I confess I'm not sure how that distinction works: the slaves are hers, not the plantation's, when she owns the plantation, but that's not the point. This woman, Samson, has a sense of well-being knowing that she has personal ownership of 200 slaves? Frankly that made me sick, and turned me right off her. It should have made her sick, coming as she did from a family that were slaves in past generations, but evidently that impinged on her considerations not one whit. The fact that she apparently sees nothing wrong at all in this contradiction in her life is mystifying to me and apparently the author was uninterested in exploring it.

Now it may well be that this is exactly how the real Samson felt, but the fact of it - or at least the fiction of it in this book made me dislike her intensely, and it strongly dissuaded me from wanting to continue reading. At one point, for example, I read, "We employed a slave to walk a few meters before us and beat the ground with a palm frond to frighten away snakes." That's so cold and callous. If this is even remotely the truth of how she was, why should I give a damn about what happens to her or what her personal troubles are? I have to wonder why the author would include something like that. Is she deliberately trying to make her character unlikable?

The fact that the author uses meters is particularly problematic because Elisabeth Samson died in 1771 and the meter wasn't 'invented' until the early 1790s! Samson would have used an archaic Dutch measure, such as an el or a rod or most probably a voet, which is pretty much the same as a foot (the Dutch word voet means foot). The book description claims that the book is "Rich with emotion and historical detail," but quite obviously, it isn’t. I detected little of either.

It also has the occasional oddity. For example, there was a sentence which made no sense to me: "Isaac is not happy with Liesbeth’s a particularly evil neighbor who is known to have slain one of Quackoe’s slaves." I have no idea what that's supposed to mean. Liesbeth and Quakoe are characters in the novel, but the sentence makes no sense. Maybe that indefinite article needs to be removed?

As that quote a few paragraphs back revealed, one of the early properties owned by Samson was Welgemoed. That's the name used in the book, but in Dutch, the word means 'good cheer' - that's what the property was called. That's how Dutch speakers would hear it. I don't imagine the slaves would think of it that way, but the owner undoubtedly did, so given that it's a much more evocative (and hypocritical!) name in English, why use the Dutch term, like it has no real meaning? At another point I read that slaves were "strolling towards the back of the plantation house to the keuken house." Keuken is the Dutch word for kitchen (think 'cookin'!), so why not use 'kitchen'?

This capriciousness in employing Dutch words in some places and not in others was seemingly quite random. It made for an oddly unsettling reading experience and overall it didn't work. The book felt far too American and not Dutch at all. Note that Suriname is on the northeast coast of South America and was a Dutch colony. The Dutch got it in exchange for the English getting New York City after a war. The official language in Suriname today is still Dutch, although many natives speak a lingo called Sranantongo. Why there was not more of a Dutch flavor to this novel, I do not know.

I have a problem with authors who do not seem to realize that words - even people's names and place names - have actual and real meaning and they therefore carry power. So in the same way the Dutch term for kitchen was used in place of the English, the English term 'manumission' or derivatives of it were used frequently in the novel.

The term which was popularly used in the middle of the nineteenth century, but not so much before or after, comes from Latin via French, and it relates to freeing slaves, but it’s far more of an American term than it is a Dutch word. The Dutch equivalent is 'vrijlating', a word which also saw a spike in usage in the mid-nineteenth century, but nowhere is that term used in this novel. It’s like this American author, rather than tying Samson to her Suriname and Dutch roots was deliberately trying to divorce her from them, and Americanize her. For me this spoiled the reading experience and rendered it very inauthentic.

How Samson was in real life, I don't know. I honestly doubt I would have liked her had I met her, but the cold attitude she evidently had toward her slaves in this work of fiction was quite off-putting. I read at various points very early in the novel things like: "La Vallaire sent for something more potent than mope, and also some slaves to fan us as the breeze had died down."

Carl Otto is the man Elisabeth supposedly loves, but at one point he outright states, "He may kill as many Negroes as he pleases...as long as he pays the five hundred florins a head." The text adds, "Carl Otto is always quick to present the logic of a situation." But that's not logic, that's mercenary callousness, and the fact that this is the cold jackass that she loves made me see there was a lot wrong with Elisabeth if she evidently sees nothing wrong with what he has said there. And the Dutch used guilders, not florins as such.

Maybe that's really how Elisabeth Samson was, in which case she deserves no respect whatsoever, no matter what she did for marriage. I can't credit a woman for liberating herself when she owns 200 slaves and is proud of it. I don't want to hear how she was a product of her time. She was a woman who had slavery in her recent past, and yet she felt nothing for the slaves she personally owned? I mean if she felt bad for her slaves she could have freed them all and hired them as workers, but she apparently did not. She was apparently not a good person regardless of her marriage endeavors, and this author neither feigns painting her in any endearing strokes nor does she offer any kind of commentary on her appalling attitude toward slaves. If, frankly my dear, she doesn't give a damn about her slaves, then why should I care a jot about her?

I DNF'd this book because it was not for me, and I honestly can’t see any thinking and feeling person finding anything romantic about it, the way it’s written.

Was this review helpful?

Thanks to Netgalley for the opportunity tobread this book. I was hooked during the first chapter. This is an incredible story and it is well written. There are a lot of characters but it was easy to follow. I learned a lot reading this one.

Was this review helpful?