Thank you, Netgalley and the author/publisher, for the opportunity to read and review an advanced reader's copy of this book. This in no way affects my review, all opinions are my own.

I'm torn. One the one hand, I really liked that the author touched a subject that has not really been brought up when talking about racism and empowering BIPOCs, i.e., mental health. On the other hand, I felt that the author threw all Black people into one pot and generalized too much. Not every solution fits for every Black person. Overall, though, this was a good book.

I truly loved this book. This is such a great read, especially for black men. For those that are going trough and trying to find their place being African American as well as being a Christian in this country. Such an inspiring read that will make you think. The author takes you on his life's journey and some of the things he's been through. It was such a great job.

I received a copy of the book via NetGalley and am voluntarily leaving an honest review.

Summary: An exploration of the relationship between relational, emotional, and spiritual health and being Black in America.

It has been a week or so since I finished Permission to be Black. I have been trying to figure out how to write this review in a helpful way. I am a white guy in my late 40s; I did not grow up listening to Jay-Z; this book wasn't written to or for me. I did, however, really enjoy the book, and I think it is constructive.

Part of the reality of grappling with a racialized existence from the majority culture is that as I strive to diversify my reading, there can be a difference between reading widely and 'the white gaze.' In reading widely, sometimes I can perpetuate my own prior biases instead of confronting them. (As I wrote about in this article at Christ and Pop Culture magazine.) I have been intentionally diversifying my reading for years. While I do not claim perfection, I think I am doing better and understanding what is for me, what is not, and how to figure out how to read something for benefit when it is not centered on my white experience. In writing this post, I struggle with talking about a book that can feed into white superiority if read wrongly.

A reason that is frequently cited for not liking the current direction of discussing race Ibham Kendi and others start with the assumption that racial disparities are wholly the result of racial discrimination. That assertion on its face seems fairly uncontraversial. But it was the central point of a recent review on the Gospel Coalition website of Kendi's book How to be Antiracist. The reviewer and many commenters disputed the possibility that all racial disparities could or should be thought of as the result of racial discrimination. Their claim seems to be that the assumption that racial disparity is the result of racial discrimination disallows data that contradicts that point and removes responsibility for how to respond to discrimination from racially discriminated communities.

I think both parts of that are easy to respond to. What is required is pushing the view of the data further back. For instance, a commenter on a friend's Facebook page blamed the higher average property tax rates Black homeowners in the US pay on the local governments and the Black and other minority cultures that allow those local governments to charge those higher tax rates. I would counter that this blames the victim of the higher tax rates (and the local government) instead of looking at the US's history of housing. The history of housing includes white flight, creating new municipalities without the historic debt of the older central cities and suburbs, which are often strapped with pension and other debt that cities incurred before white flight. That is one small example of not going back to the root causes of disparity, which I believe is what Kendi is advocating in saying that racial disparity is the result of racial discrimination. The second part of the claim is that discriminated communities have a moral and ethical responsibility to respond well to discrimination. And while I do not want to dispute that we all have a responsibility for our own behavior, there is often no similar request for oppressing communities to respond well with appropriate reparations for the oppression.

I have all of this too-long introduction because Permission to be Black is a call to seek healing from the pain and trauma of generational discrimination. Thomason is not citing a deficient Black culture, as some who believe in white superiority would posit, but racial discrimination and its widespread impact. But I want to affirm that I do not believe that there is a moral, ethical, cultural, or social deficiency within the Black community. Still, there is a greater level of trauma, including generational trauma, because racial discrimination has been perpetuated for generations.

The thrust of Permission to be Black is simple. AD Thomason tells the story of his own life, one that has personal and generational trauma, and his own work toward healing and wholeness. The overwhelming message is that he wants to be the one that does the work to move toward healing and wholeness because he wants to break generational cycles so that his current relationships and his children and community's future relationships will not perpetuate the harm inflicted upon them by earlier generations of brutal white supremacy.

I generally am not a fan of self-help books, but Permission to be Black is the type of self-help book that I gratefully embrace because it does not pretend that five simple steps will solve everyone's problems. Thomason uses Cheat Codes, which are pointers or shortcuts that Thomason points out as visions of how to accomplish healing or what healthy relationships can look like. He is not suggesting that the reader, myself included, can skip steps to healing, but that he is hoping that he can inspire the reader to put in the work to enjoy the fruit of the healing.

Permission to be Black is primarily oriented toward men, and some of that is just pointing out toxic masculinity and patriarchy that cuts across racial lines. The idea that men should repress emotion is widespread and harmful regardless of their racial background. Still, there is an additional layer of emotional repression coupled with discriminatory tropes like the angry black man. The adage 'hurt people, hurt people' is true. As I have seen processing of people around me talk about Kirk Franklin's call with his son and other examples of generational harm, I am really encouraged by Thomason and others I know personally striving to break those generational cycles.

A good self-help book inspires and gives tools to work toward becoming a better self. A Christian chooses to do work to become a better self, not just because that moves us toward becoming the person that God wants us to be, but because we love those around us, and being a better self, is part of what it means to love those around us well. I am far from where I want to be as a man, husband, and father. But I want to be better, and I think that I can see the fruit of the work that I have been doing over the past 6-8 years. But there is still more work to be done, and I was really encouraged by reading Permission to be Black, and I think it has helped give me both inspiration and direction on how to proceed.

Thomason takes a bunch of highly important ideas from different disciplines - trauma counseling, neuoroscience, majority culture studies, personal therapy, theology of race - and shows what he learned about expressing pain in a healthy way, while healing and finding a way forward. He describes these ideas in a personal way, showing the moments where he learned about these ideas from mentors and explored them with other people, also including spoken word poems which explore the themes on an artistic as well as an analytical level.