Member Reviews

Wingate writes an realistic view of submarine warfare for the British in the Mediterranean Sea during WW2. I enjoyed the plot and characters.

Was this review helpful?

Thank you netgalley.co.uk for a free copy of this ebook, first published in 1959 number one of three in the submariner Sinclair series written by John Alan Wingate. The author is well researched on the second world war and especially in the naval theatre using his own personal wartime experiences in submarines. During the battle of the British Channel serving in a Chasseur (small fast naval vessel used in anti submarine warfare) being mentioned in dispatches, moving on to joining The Fighting Tenth Submarine Flotilla based in the Med. Johns factual book of the same name recounts the exploits of the 34 small U class subs, who damaged or sank over a million tons of Axis shipping, Now the scene is set for our hero Sinclair which I believe is based upon Johns wartime experience, we spend a little time on board a Chasseur for a quarter of the book and the rest underwater in a sub fighting the dastardly Germans and Italians. Realistic battles really draw you under, I loved the use of language (had to look up the word tintinnabulation, yes a real word ! means the tiny sounds of bells) that placed you in the action, easy to read and a ripping yarn just don't read this in the bath.

Was this review helpful?

This novel has all the compassion and authenticity of Nicholas Monsarrat's classic The Cruel Sea and all the daring action of Alistair MacLean's HMS Ulysses. As with both these novels, Submariner Sinclair is informed by the author's own experiences in World War II. His protagonist is sent to the edge of human endurance and beyond in a claustrophobic world where death can claim you at any moment.
The comaderie between the entirely male cast is one of the strengths of this engaging novel. Written more than sixty years ago John Wingate's book is as readable and relevant as it was then. I highly recommend it.

Was this review helpful?

I’m a big fan of older thrillers and crime novels, and there’s certainly something kind of neat about reading a WW2 adventure written just 14 years after the end of the conflict. I haven’t been able to find out much about the author John Wingate, but given that the title page puts this letters DSC after his name (short for Distinguished Service Cross, a medal awarded to British military officers), I’m assuming he fought in the war, presumably in the Royal Navy.
‘Submariner Sinclair’ is certainly not short of convincing detail, when it comes to life aboard a fighting ship. Unfortunately, what it is short on is thrills. Despite being packed with incident it’s a devastatingly dull book. Wingate throws his hero, plucky officer Peter Sinclair, into all sorts of scrapes – sea battles above and below the waves, a daring commando mission to rescue POWs – but he does so with prose that lacks any real spark. I failed to connect with Sinclair or the other characters. That’s something that doesn’t have to be a problem in a thriller, but it is a problem when there’s nothing else to grab your attention.
The book very much reminded me of a novel version of one of the ‘Commando’ comics. For the uninitiated, which is probably anyone who wasn’t a boy in the UK in the 60s or 70s, these were a seemingly endless series of one off WW2 comic adventures. I read many of them, but even as a kid I generally found them dull, despite their two-fisted action.
Like those comics, Wingate’s book lacks any nuance or depth. Brits and colonials (Australians and Canadians) are good,Germans and Italians are bad. There’s no grey area on either side, and the Axis troops are constantly dehumanised with racial slurs. They’re referred to by both the Allied characters and narrator as ‘Huns’ or ‘Wops’ almost exclusively. That’s probably not surprising in a low brow war novel from the 1950s, but it is disappointing that nothing was done to correct or at least contextualise the language in this 2021 reissue.
Combining that lazy nationalism with the leaden writing results in a book that fails to be entertaining in any way.

Was this review helpful?