Unfortunately this was a DNF. Not really sure why, the story didn't click with me and I couldn't engage with the main characters. Also the storytelling seemed a bit too forced, overly florid in places.

This book was alot, the world building was interesting and the author managed to create a sort of old timey London feeling world very Dickens but magic. The writting wasn't my favourite as it was overly wordy for me, everything was described in such great detail that it actually pulled me out of the world instead of help shape it for me but that's my personal preference I'd rather have the world built through the characters eyes than have things just listed at me.
There were so many characters thrown at you in this book, don't get me wrong they were well written but it was alot to wrap your head around and certainly not an easy read to try and remember everyone. I felt the main characters were rather unlikeable and annoying, Sam was so shallow and frustratingly dependent on everyone and Bryony was just unlikable to me.
I feel like this book was far to long and it made it really hard to get to the end. Personally I felt like not finishing it after about 70% because it felt like a chore. I feel it should have been 2 books and cut in half. There were too many sub plots and characters for me to keep up with and I fell it would have been better as a duology and easier to consume as a reader.

Thank you NetGalley and Head of Zeus for providing me with the e-arc for A Clockwork River. As a life-long Fantasy and Sci Fi reader I was completely captured by the idea of a Steam Punk novel and eager to start this reading journey.

A Clockwork River is a completely unique book and it was a great new experience that introduced me as a reader to a totally new, complex, and innovative world – the world building is first class and truly transported me as a reader.

However, I will be clear that this is definitely not a book to pick up at bedtime. The language in itself is truly complex and advanced, the sentences and paragraphs are long and even with my excellent command of the English language, I found it a challenge.

The story in itself is absorbing and I really do not regret reading this book. As a first, it challenges boundaries and truly breaches the gorge between Fantasy as it is today and the Hydropunk!

Turning the last page of Jacob and Sara Emery's debut novel feels rather like coming to the end of a long and difficult journey. That's not always a bad thing, I felt the same way when I finished Don Quixote and Ulysses. It would have been easy to give up at the midpoint, but I'm glad I saw it through to the end and I thank NetGalley and Head of Zeus for providing me with an advanced copy.

The truth is, A Clockwork River is a truly unique book. Literally, as it happens - it is the world's first Hydropunk novel, after all. On that basis alone I would definitely recommend it to any fantasy reader who wants to experience something new, and I do credit the authors for creating such an inventive and complex world.

Jacob and Sara are clearly in love with language, and that shines through in the text. Unfortunately, it does bring with it some problems. When an author uses words like "mucilaginous" you know it's not a book intended to wind down with at the end of the day. My biggest concern, though, is the lengthy sentences and overuse of commas. Language is wonderful, but you can showcase that without writing sentences that are 164-words-long (yes, I counted). For the author's sake, I think some editing may be required to correct some of these issues before publication.

I bailed on this one at the 65% mark, after the level of fortunate coincidence passed what I could tolerate.

There seems to be a rule in effect in this book that you can either have agency or interiority, but not both. What I mean is that the chatty omniscient narrator gives us insight into the thoughts and feelings of some characters, who we therefore assume are the protagonists; but those characters don't protagonise. The only effectual action (at least, up to the 65% mark) comes from secondary characters or the villain and his minions, and even then, most of them aren't especially competent.

Sam, whose qualifications to be the primary protagonist seem to mainly consist of being a middle-class white guy, is so ineffectual that any attempt he makes to do anything only ever makes the situation worse, necessitating yet another rescue by a random character. He's what I call a Spoiled Protagonist (not that he's a protagonist, really); wherever he goes, people who should be attending to their own business down tools and leap to help him for no readily apparent reason, often rescuing him from the consequences of his own incompetence, and, if female, falling in love with him (he also falls in love with every woman he meets, immediately and superficially). Having been rescued, he soon manages to bungle things and deposit himself into another fix, and the cycle repeats with a new rescuer. This episodic structure reminded me of picaresque, but Sam is not picaresque; he's too hapless and useless, too much of a schlemiel. The author is forced to heap greater and greater amounts of "good luck" on him in order to keep him moving through the plot and not dying, and eventually I couldn't take it anymore.

Sam's sister Briony is, at least, trying a bit harder and showing more competence, but at the point I gave up she was shaping up to be more of a potential victim than a protagonist.

The adjective I kept thinking of for the relatively lightly-sketched setting is "Dickensian," which is not a compliment coming from me; I have no love for Dickens' grimy, run-down world. It also has lots of characters (many of them more-or-less-good-hearted scoundrels or eccentrics) and lots of words - though, to the author's credit, the pace didn't drag for me.

The pre-publication ARC I had from Netgalley also has many, many unnecessary coordinate commas, or, as the author would punctuate it, "unnecessary, coordinate commas". The author also doesn't know when to use commas before "who" or "which", or where to put the apostrophe when a possessive noun is plural. The copy editor has their work cut out for them, which is usually a predictor of a book that will be published with a lot of residual errors. The vocabulary is expansive, and includes some words that neither I nor my Kindle's dictionary knew, but I only spotted one clear error in vocabulary usage (the word "chit," which means a girl, used to refer to Sam when he was a child). It's probable that a lot of this will be fixed before publication, but again, even the best copy editor misses about 10% of the issues, and 10% of these issues is a lot.

The book did have some strengths; the numerous characters are distinct and memorable, it manages to be wordy without being dull, and the numerous subplots included some mysteries that I wanted to know the answer to. But I didn't want to know badly enough to trudge through more ineptitude from Sam, from which he would, no doubt, be rescued by increasingly unlikely coincidences.