Member Reviews

The plot itself is faster and more interesting, which I was very happy about after the first novel, but the exaggerated philosophizing that is typical of Sapko (I wouldn't even call that a negative, as I personally enjoyed it and it made me smile more than once, but I can understand someone who is averse to it), the gratuitous amount of Latin, and the use of an awful lot of names, places and titles sometimes really makes reading difficult.

Was this review helpful?