I wasn't sure what to expect when I started this book. I picked it up because of the title mainly. I was so glad that I did. I was unable to put it down. From the first scream in the library I was entranced. There were so many reason to keep reading this book. I loved the. I loved the characters and how they worked together in the story. If you like mysteries this is a great read for you. I had no idea all the twists and turns this books would have. The fact that it first started in the Boston Public Library was just a plus for me.

This book’s description had me very intrigued. Who doesn’t love the premise of a good locked door murder mystery set in a library? But this one fell flat for me. The switching between the main storyline and the subplots makes it difficult to keep up with and also leaves little room for good character development, so everyone is bland. It does have some nice twists though. If you enjoy books that shift between two plots at once, you may enjoy this twisty thriller.

Very interesting book and story. I like how the author have intertwined the characters in this one. It started to read a little choppy but it smoothed out eventually.

Thank you to Netgalley for providing me with this book in exchange for my honest opinion. The Woman in the Library is available now.

The thing that grabbed me and immediately interested me in reading this book was that it featured the word “library” in the title. That’s it. If there is an angle that features words, libraries, or bookstores, I’ll be almost immediately intrigued. The writing and storyline kept me reading, happily drawn into a fun mystery involving four new-found friends.

Author Sulari Gentill plays off the new-friend dynamic incredibly well. When people first hit it off, it’s easier to ignore (or not even notice) things about the other person which will either begin to annoy over time or, in the worst of cases, turn out to be major red flags. These four people met in a library reading room, brought together by a stressful event. That’s enough to form the beginnings of friendship right there, although of course someone is not who they seem.

The book’s storytelling tricks were my favorite thing about it. The Woman in the Library features an author named Hannah Tigone who is writing a novel that starts in a library. The novel is about a writer (named Freddie) who gets sucked into a murder while researching for her own book. It sounds a lot more confusing than it is. For the purpose of this review, I’ll refer to the character writing the book about the writer as the author, and the character who happens to be in the library at the time of a murder as the writer. It’s actually a ton of fun, despite my lousy attempt to explain it.

While the writer in the book builds new friendships, the author begins to be disturbed by the unhealthy relationship forming with her Beta reader. Now, that was a character that was easy to hate. Holy cow, everything he “wrote” in his letters to Hannah was absolutely awful. That it degenerated in nature from horrible to dangerous was an unexpected progression that made a sick sort of sense. The continuation of the story wavered from distracting to adding an extra layer of suspense. I’m still not sure how I feel about that whole thing, although I can’t deny that it ratcheted up the tension level of The Woman in the Library.

There were four main characters in the author’s book: the writer, Freddie, in the U.S. from Australia with the purpose of working on her own book; Whit, the laze-about whose aspirations don’t match those of his overbearing mother; Marigold, a tattooed free spirit who is also something of a genius (according to her); and Cain, an enigma who has written a bestselling book of his own. One of them is also a coldblooded killer, of course. It’s up to Freddie to figure out who.

I will admit that I figured out the whodunnit before it was revealed, although the motive escaped me. The characters were all fun to read, although I had a soft spot for nosy, stalkerish Marigold. The book raised the stakes as it went along and by the end it was hurtling at breakneck speed toward its conclusion. I liked the way the book’s pacing sped up as the mystery got closer to being solved.

There was some brief mention of attempted sexual assault, which I feel I should warn readers about. It was not detailed, but it’s always best (in my opinion) to be aware if something like that will pop up. I’m sensitive to that subject and it was vague and short enough that I was able to skip over the paragraph or so mentioning it without any issue. So, there’s that.

The Woman in the Library was a highly entertaining mystery filled with twists and unexpected reveals. I enjoyed it quite a bit and recommend it to people who want a fun suspense-ridden novel.

Thank you for giving me the chance to read this. I loved the idea of it and the cover is perfect. I just couldn't connect with it. I found the story within a story to be too much and wasn't enjoying it. I think I could have connected better to the characters and story if it didn't have the switches in parts. The Editor parts were more like interrupting it for me.

There was a lot going on in this book! A story inside of a story! I buckled in from the first page and never trusted a single soul. This was my first book by this author an I was pleasantly surprised how quickly this book grabbed my attention and refused to let me sleep until I knew all the answers! Fantastic read.

A library. Book Lovers. A reading room. Book Lovers. Murder. Immediate obsession. Add a complicated narrative requiring your complete attention.
I had to pause life to keep - well worth it! There is so much I want to say - but I don't want to give it anything away. This book deconstructs murder mysteries - offering puns, standard characters, complicated narrative and a plot that will have you obsessed!

This was an absolutely fascinating read! I loved the story within a story. The merging of real life with the actual crime was keeping me on my toes. I was constantly guessing where the story would lead next. The setting of Boston was also really exciting! The author did an excellent job really creating a scene intentionally.

I received an advanced reader copy of Woman in the Library by Sulari Gentill in exchange for an honest review.

“Murderer isn’t a job description. It tends to be something you do on the side.”

The Woman in the Library begins with an excellent premise: four strangers are sitting together in the library when they hear a scream. The strangers quickly become friends, not realizing one of their new friends is a murderer. How exciting! This book starts off with a bang and then maintains that momentum throughout. I loved reading about the four friends and the mystery that tied them together.

What the blurb failed to mention is this novel’s brilliant meta narrative. At the end of every chapter there is a letter addressed to Hannah, the in-universe author of the book we’re reading. Hannah has been sending drafts of her chapters to Leo, who lives in Boston and thus can provide insight and suggestions regarding the accuracy of the setting of Woman in the Library. I had no idea what to expect from these letters, and their storyline was at some points even more thrilling than the main narrative! It was amusing reading each chapter and then seeing Leo pick it apart. The addition of these letters to the novel was genius, and elevated Woman in the Library to another level.

That isn’t the only way in which this novel is super meta; Hannah is writing about four strangers in a library hearing a scream and trying to solve the murder, and then her protagonist Winnifred/Freddie is also a writer, and uses her experience in the library as inspiration for her own novel where four strangers in a library hear a scream and try to solve the murder. I know meta narratives can be polarizing for some readers, but it is done so masterfully here that even those who typically avoid it would be remiss to pass this up.

Woman in the Library is without a doubt the best book I’ve read through NetGalley this year. It is a phenomenal novel, and now I’m eager to pick up Gentill’s other novel, After She Wrote Him. Thank you NetGalley and Poisoned Pen Press for the advanced reader copy.

Have you ever listened to an audiobook and wished that you were reading the story instead?

The book within a book concept was pretty fun but in the audiobook version it left me confused several times. Especially when Leo's letters had a different voice than Leo in the story. I thought they were different people for the first part of the book and then I thought I had mistaken something for a while. Even at the end I was still scratching my head a bit.

Other than that, the scream in the Library to begin the story was so exciting. And the creation of the friend group and their individual characters were also very enjoyable. I think as the story went on, I lost interest a bit.

Strong start, but then it took a long time for the story to pick up and go.

The Woman in the Library by Sulari Gentill



Four strangers are sitting at a table in the Boston library and a scream pierces the silence.
They can't leave until the reason for the scream is known. So they talk and get to know each other just a little.

Freddie is writing a book and I really liked her. She and the other three at the table are students. She nicknames (in her head) the others as "Handsome Man", "Freud girl" and the last guy is "Heroic Chin".

This story is a book within a book, as we also have Leo who is another student who writes to author Hannah.

The foursome band together and try to solve a mystery. This book had me hooked from the beginning.

I did not guess "who dunnit" but I enjoyed the journey.

There seemed to be a lot of eating, every time the four met, or even two of them it was somewhere to eat.

I really enjoyed this mystery quite a bit.

I would recommend it highly.

thank you to the publisher and Netgalley

4*****

I’m greatly surprised by how much hype there has been for this book, which is essentially a forgettable, below average mystery.

I read a LOT in the mystery genre and I’m not super picky as long as the solve isn’t awful, but this one is unengaging, has no atmosphere, has no feeling of suspense, and the characters lack even a shred of nuance.

The solve is fine, if predictable, but the backstory that leads there is dull and the delivery of it clumsy.

There are so, so many great mysteries that get very little attention. It’s baffling to me why this one got so much.

This was a thriller of another kind. Definitely was not your typical one of the mill thriller. There was a story within a story in this book so you really have to pay attention to what was going on. Remind me of silent patient because the writing was insightful and intelligent. It was a multi dimensional story with a true whodunit vibe. Absolutely loved it.

Review published on Goodreads, 27 April 2022:

I've been wanting to read this book ever since I heard about it and you know what? It did not disappoint. The premise is a simple one—four strangers are brought together because of a suspicious scream in a library that leads to their temporary detainment and subsequent friendship. When a body is later found in the library, an amateur murder investigation naturally ensues. Like I said, a simple premise but one with TONS of potential for a fun, clever, entertaining mystery novel—which is exactly what THE WOMAN IN THE LIBRARY is. The tale has an intriguing story-within-a-story structure that gives it an appealing hook. Its main story is upbeat, fast-moving, and twisty. Freddie and her new friends are likable characters, with a rapport that is palpable right from the beginning. While the killer's identity didn't surprise me any, the plot still held my attention and kept me guessing. I read THE WOMAN IN THE LIBRARY quickly because it was such an enjoyable yarn. I'll definitely be looking for more of Gentill's engaging mysteries.

Me, personally, I’d say this is a three-star book, but I’d still recommend it to those who like murder mysteries so four. It was a pretty fun read, twisty, and multi-layered. I enjoyed the writing but I don’t think the story was overall for me. I also wasn’t too keen on the main character and a few others.

I made a valiant attempt attempt to read this book; however, try as I might,”The Woman In The Library” just did not grab my attention as I believed it would when NetGalley made it available. The synopsis of the story was an excellent “gripper:” Four people sitting in a library when out shouts a woman’s scream. Should have led to several sleepless nights reading. But it just didn’t grip me as I expected.
So for some this should be a great read. But I can only give it a modest 3 stars.

This book wasn't what I expected it to be. It was better. Gentill's writing was so well done. I couldn't put this mystery down. I needed to know who was the killer and who really was Leo. The way their each individual stories entwined together and the complexity of them. Definitely a good quick read. Plus, a double mystery with a twist.

3,5 stars, This murder mystery was intriguing with the different character development however it left me a bit confused with it being a story within a story. The characters and the quick relationships they suddenly build in the library also seemed a bit unrealistic. Interesting plot however I was hoping for more.

A book that has a setting in the library is a pretty solid selling point. For me though, that ended up being the only selling point for The Woman in the Library. In this book, you are following Hannah as she writes a book but also navigates her own life. I think the difficult part about this book is the writing style-You essentially have 3 pieces happening at once: The book that Hannah is writing, correspondence between Hannah and her editor Leo, and then a weird personal layer that develops midway through the book when we find out Leo may not be who we think he is. There isn't much separation between dialogues so especially at the beginning, it is hard to tell you are reading a piece of Hannah's book, or reading about Hannah's life. Because of the multi-layers, there are a lot of characters and not much depth to them.

I think for me personally, if Hannah's book had been better, it would've been more enticing to read. Hannah's book read much like a bad version of clue and just didn't captivate me.

I think the potential for this book is there and I can see why people enjoy it, but it just wasn't the book for me. This book is perfect for those who like the inner workings of writing or perhaps true crime. I also have to wonder if the audio is better.

I was super excited to read this one from the premise alone. But for some reason, it kind of fell flat for me. I loved that we got a story within a story kind of, with following along with the woman writing the book and the happenings with her "correspondent" and the actual story itself. As the story went on, I became more invested in the characters, however I did end up predicting what was to happen way before it was going to and that didn't make it that interesting to me anymore. Also, the "correspondent", the author converses with, what point did any of that have to do with anything? I understand it added something to the overall story, but it just felt out of place and then super rushed at the end. I think this could have been something remarkable, it just fell flat for me.

Thank you to Poisoned Pen Press for letting me read an early copy of this interesting book!