True crime stories are so often as good as any fictional story written today. A man is killed after many years of constant crime and disregard for his neighbors. The lack of action by those sworn to protect the public and preserve the community have placed these duties on the shoulders of the citizens. When these citizens take action, should they be treated as criminals or officials enforcing the law?

I enjoyed the writing style. This book lacked suspense and the pacing was very slow. This is an informative book but not very gripping

It's a true crime book based on a real-life situation. I like the way the author just goes all out with the background information and all TMIs. I like the book and enjoy it more than I thought.
Thanks to Netgalley for the copy!

This was unlike any other true crime novel I’ve ever read. Full of facts not only on the crime but on the history of the place where the crime was committed and the people who live there, as well as the voices of those who knew both the victim and the perpetrators, this book shows that not everything is as black or white as the law allows.

I’m super glad I got the chance to read this one.

Thank you NetGalley, Steerforth Press and Silver David Cameron for the advanced copy in exchange for my honest opinion.

In his riveting and meticulously reported final book, Silver Donald Cameron offers a stunning, intricate narrative about a notorious killing and its devastating repercussions.

Cameron’s searing, utterly gripping story about one small community raises a disturbing question: Are there times when taking the law into your own hands is not only understandable but the responsible thing to do?

In June 2013, three upstanding citizens of a small town on Cape Breton Island murdered their neighbor, Phillip Boudreau, at sea.

While out checking their lobster traps, two Landry cousins and skipper Dwayne Samson saw Boudreau in his boat, the Midnight Slider, about to vandalize their lobster traps. Like so many times before, the small-time criminal was about to cost them thousands of dollars out of their seasonal livelihood.

Boudreau seemed invincible, a miscreant who would plague the village forever. Meanwhile the police and local officials were frustrated, cowed, and hobbled by shrinking budgets.

One of the men took out a rifle and fired four shots at Boudreau and his boat.

Was the Boudreau killing cold blooded murder, a direct reaction to credible threats, or the tragic result of local officials failing to protect the community? As many local people have said, if those fellows hadn't killed him, someone else would have...

The storyline kept me glued to my Kindle through the whole book! I definitely recommend reading this book! Its well worth reading! Thank you Netgalley and the publisher for sharing this book with me!

An extremely well researched and wonderfully told about an incident that never should have happened. The author leaves us wondering whether we really knows what happened and "who done it".

Thank you NetGalley for the ARC.

Well written true crime story of what happens when you take the law into your own hands. I never thought I would enjoy a book about the lobster industry, but this book was good.

I received this book from the publisher through Netgalley for review and all thoughts and opinions are my own.
Canada, a friendly nation, full of resilient and quirky individuals, has a long history of sea-faring fishermen. The maritime provinces are especially known for hardy people with strong family and friendship ties to the small communities that dot its shores.This book tells the disturbing tale on one community, a terrible crime and the background of individuals involved. It raises questions about the community policing and the way an island community keeps secrets. The background on the methodology of crime solving and law should have been presented first, in my opinion, as a foundation for the dialogue depicting the suspects, crime committed and the lawless victim who contributed to his own demise. Overall, interesting and sad true crime story. Note: film on the crime is currently featured on Amazon prime.

Thank you to Netgalley for an advanced copy of this book in exchange for an honest review.

I found this book captivating, so well-written and compassionate. A brilliant account of a crime. Recommended.

Should a true-crime recounting of a murder ever be “enjoyable?” And if so, how can one aptly describe an experience as pleasurable when it involves death?

This is the Catch-22 when it comes to books like Silver Donald Cameron’s Blood in the Water. Like the true-crime book Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil by John Berendt, Blood in the Water is filled with a collection of amusing people and circumstances in such a way that the recounting of a murder and the subsequent trial is both compelling and amusing at times.

Blood in the Water is similar to watching a short video clip of a person’s mishap that at first appears to be innocently humorous until the realization that the mishap was actually pretty serious.

Another way to describe Cameron’s book would be to imagine a blending of Berendt’s book, the historical background of Say Nothing by Patrick Radden Keefe, with the quirkiness of the Netflix documentary The Legend of Cocaine Island.

In June of 2013, three Acadian fishermen of Petit de Grat, Isle Madame, Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia, Canada, fed up with the habitual and decades-long criminality of Philip Boudreau, decide it is time to take matters into their own hands and end up killing Boudreau while he is vandalizing their lobster cages.

Through descriptions, Boudreau is almost able to be imagined as a real-life gadfly and troublemaker similar to the fictional character Ernest T. Bass from the classic television series The Andy Griffith Show, but only in a more serious and dangerous way. For decades, Boudreau was not only known for minor acts of misbehavior, but much more serious ones such as threatening to burn down the homes of people if they complained, which also included threats to law enforcement personnel if they took action against his acts of criminality.

Boudreau also bore a duality of either being liked and tolerated or intensely despised for his behavior.

In dealing with not only the murder and subsequent trial, like Keefe’s Say Nothing, Cameron provides an in-depth, but accessible history of the Acadian people of the region and of their culture. For example, unlike the legal system of the United States being largely guided by legal precedents and original foundations, the legal system of this region has been allowed to modify by accepting how the changes in culture and society are dynamic and ever-changing, and such evolution should be taken into account in legal matters.

Cameron’s examination of Acadian society allows the reader to fully grasp the uniqueness of the region and its citizens, which adds to the complexity of how difficult it was to curtail Boudreau’s behavior, especially when people were worried about their homes being burnt to the ground with them in them. Acadians are very community-oriented, forgiving, and with a practice of helping neighbors in need while in a community where doors are not locked at night or when people are not in their homes.

Blood in The Water is recommended to fans of true crime novels with legal matters and well-researched backgrounds.

Netgalley provided a copy of Blood in the Water with the promise of a fair review.

This review was originally published at MysteryandSuspence.com.

In June 2013, three men killed a neighbour. This neighbour, however, was no angel himself. But did he deserve to die? And how did things get to the point where this ended up as a solution? I found this book really interesting. It didn’t just cover the killing, but it talked about the Acadian community and the history of the area, all of which had an impact on how the community worked together. I also really enjoyed the interviews with the locals. It really felt like the author had taken the time to talk to a variety of different people, which meant it felt like a balanced portrayal of the parties involved. I do believe it also helped that he’d lived in the area a time, and so he was able to really tease out the differences between a murder in a small fishing village in Nova Scotia and a murder in a big city. This isn’t a book where you necessarily put it down with the feeling justice has been done. As I finished it, it was easy to see how everybody had been let down. The killers had tried time and again to get help to protect their families and livelihood, only to be told there was nothing to help. The victim had been let down by a system that didn’t seem to be concerned with helping him. Was justice done? Read and decide for yourself.

This was a well-written crime novel, but became a little heavy on the history of the towns, details on industries, and other (un)related backgrounds. For me, that made the story drag a bit more than I would've preferred. It felt like filler when the story couldn't been moved along quicker.

I appreciated the multiple view points; it's often hard to understand both sides of a story from a neutral starting point. And it made me question assumptions and what I would do in a similar situation, always the mark of a thought-provoking read.

I’ve read many true crime books and tend to gravitate toward small town murder investigations. This book read more of a historical recap or a biography to me. There was a lot of detailed information on the location and and the lore of the area as well as a deep dive into the community & societal development which I found very interesting.

Well Crafted And Immersive…
Fascinating account of a true crime. Is taking the law into your hands ever the right thing to do? It happens. Well crafted and immersive reading which effectively captures equal sides of this occurrence. Both moving and emotional.

I am not as familiar with Canadian true crime stories, so this book was my first exposure. It was a fantastic read! I am saddened to hear that it is his last book. The overall question this book addresses is "is it okay to take the law into your own hands?" While I would never advocate for committing murder, or crime period, I could see why the events unfolded in the manner they did. Cameron did lay the background very well, and I was engaged from the first page.

Well written crime novel. I was interested from beginning to end. Thanks to publisher and NetGalley for this read.

This is really interesting! Silver Donald Cameron really captures the essence of Isle Madame from its people to its culture and highlights everything that led to the tragedy with Philip Boudreau. He masterfully captures the timeline of events and explores them in detail in exquisite writing that really envelops the reader and makes them feel like an Isle Madame resident.

I was excited to read and review Silver Donald Cameron’s Blood in the Water: A True Story of Revenge in the Maritimes (Viking 2020) because its story takes place in Petit de Grat, a small Acadian fishing village off the coast of Cape Breton Island. My family is spread across Nova Scotia, but my roots are in New Waterford, located at the tip of Cape Breton. Cape Breton Island is known for its breathtaking natural beauty and welcoming islanders, so it was surprising to learn that in June of 2013, Phillip Boudreau was murdered in Petit de Grat after three local fishermen saw him vandalizing their lobster traps. Infamously referred to as the “Murder for Lobster” case by the media, Cameron’s text takes a deep dive into the crime as well as the community that it occurred in, complicating the media’s salacious and oversimplified explanation of the crime.

Phillip Boudreau is described as a complicated figure within his community. One of the many wonderful things about Cameron’s text is that he does not ask you to take his word for it—he brings you to the people who lived it. He interviews the people of Petit de Grat and relays their perspectives in mini-sections he calls “Island Voices.” These parts of the book were some of my favorites because you get a real sense of the community and the realities of the case from the people who were there. Cameron describes Phillip as someone who was frequently in trouble with the law and at odds with many folks in the community. One community member similarly stated that “Phillip would steal the beads off Christ’s moccasins. But then if you needed them, he’d turn around and give them to you” (28). Another mentioned that “He’d steal…but if you needed it, he’d give it to you. I used to call him Robin Hood” (29). One particular quote within the “Island Voices” section perfectly describes Cameron’s approach to the case: “But as bad as he was, he never hurt nobody. He never deserved what happened to him” (28).

Cameron does not downplay the harm Phillip created in his community through his thievery and the general chaos he could often create. But he also acknowledges that murder was not the solution to Petit de Grat’s Phillip problem, and he relays the complex community dynamics that were at play both pre-and post-murder. The story of the murder itself has been contested by the people that lived through it. However, the generally accepted version is that Craig Landry, James Landry and Dwayne Samson went out on their fishing boat and saw Phillip messing with their lobster traps. They become angry, as this was not the first time Phillip had stolen from their traps and/or vandalized them. Phillip, as well as his boat, was shot by one of the men in the fishing boat. Phillip’s boat began to capsize, and allegedly, to make his body sink, they tied an anchor around him until he fell to the ocean floor. Cameron goes through the various stories that were told with warranted skepticism, and he criticizes the ways that the facts of the case were established by the court. This book is just as much about a murder that occurs in a small community as it is about the failures of the Canadian justice system. Cameron spends time going through all court proceedings (proceedings he attended as a journalist) and attempts to makes sense of the twists and turns of our often-futile system. His critical eye translates well: through Cameron, we can see where the justice system failed Petit de Grat, the perpetrators, and Phillip himself.

Another aspect of Cameron’s text that I loved was the history he gives of Acadians in Nova Scotia. Cameron never loses sight of the fact that Petit de Grat is an Acadian town. In his surveying of the community, we are made to understand how the history of Acadians effect towns like Petit du Grat years later. Cameron also explains what the general character or code of Acadians are, describing it as “the Golden Rule, with teeth. It’s a system of rewards and responsibilities, developed by the community, that shapes general behaviour” (53). Cameron also relays the history of major industry in Cape Breton (mining, fishing), religious histories, and Acadians’ relations with the Mi’kmaq peoples. These sections were fascinating and well told.

What I enjoyed most about this book was the way it not only criticized the Canadian criminal justice system, but also turned to Indigenous systems of legal knowledge to make sense of the case. In chapter fourteen, “The Nature of Law,” Cameron states that:

“There are other legal traditions, however, and some of the most sophisticated and sensitive ones belong to the First Nations…As the great Anishinaabe legal scholar John Borrows explains, law is ‘what provides guidance for people in their lives,’ and it is found in ‘the things that deserve respect in the world. So, if you see a good set of behaviours from elders, you would find law emanating from those people, because they are worthy of respect, because they have demonstrated that worthiness through their actions, the way they have talked and they’ve lived’”(230).

Cameron also quotes Borrows as saying that Indigenous law comes from non-human sources as well:

“If you see a bird and the way that bird takes care of its young, and you recognize in that interaction there is something that you should be taking into your own life…you would find law in that source as well” (230).

Cameron uses Borrows’ legal wisdom and understanding to reflect upon Phillip’s case, stating that when looking back on it, “one can discern two distinct systems of law. One is the formal system of prosecutors and juries and courthouses. The other one, the informal community system, is very like the Indigenous system, rooted in a community’s daily life, its history, and its most cherished values” (231). Cameron acknowledges that both systems failed in this case, but while the failures of the community system has caused “its members anguish and self-criticism,” the formal legal system “barely even suspects that it failed” (231). The beauty of Cameron’s book is that he leaves no stone unturned. He surveys the community and its history while also relaying the story of the case and the legal failures therein. In so many ways, Cameron’s book resists equating this case to a classic story of revenge. Instead, his book is a cultural artifact, a story about a complex community who is still picking up the pieces from this disaster while the rest of the world has moved on. True crime fans will love this book, but because it goes above and beyond the classic true crime structure, all lovers of non-fiction will appreciate this excellent text.

Please add Blood in the Water to your Goodreads shelf.

Don’t forget to follow True Crime Index on Twitter and please visit our Goodreads for updates on what we’re reading!

About the Writer:

Jesyka Traynor is an academic living in Kingston, Ontario, Canada. When she’s not writing or researching her dissertation, she’s consuming all the true crime and non-fiction she can find time for. Jesyka holds two degrees in English literature and is currently pursuing a doctorate in contemporary Californian literature. Her work on women in twenty-first century true crime is forthcoming from Crime Fiction Studies.

A good true crime novel. The story is well told with plenty of background information so the reader can understand and follow the story. It is a great look at the problems within the enforcement of laws that is sometime faced by the police.

Thank you to #NetGalley for the ARC in exchange for my honest review.

Every place has its ne'er-do-well, and Isle Madame's was a particular menace. So when he was killed out at sea by a fed-up crew of fishermen, reactions in the community were mixed.

This was an interesting read, but not as true crime unfortunately. I enjoyed the style of writing and how entwined the author was with the community. I liked learning about the Acadians and life on Isle Madame, and how someone like Philip could get away with what he did for so long.

However, the courtroom scenes dragged, with the author often relating the trial verbatim in parts. There's not a lot of suspense around the crime as we know pretty much from the start what happened, and the more intense reveals about the character of the victim were buried very late in the book.

Overall, an informative read, but not a favorite.