This book is one in a series called, "Reclaiming Catholic History." Like the others, it packs a lot into its very readable 200 pages. Obviously, when you are talking about 300 very important years in such few words, there will be much that is oversimplified or quite simply left out. Exhaustive, this book is not. Neither is it very nuanced. Instead, it is a simple retelling of the history of Western Christianity roughly from the time of the Black Death until the Peace of Westphalia from a Roman Catholic perspective. Each chapter is peppered with two types of asides. There is the "You be the judge" section that defends the RCC side of a controversial issue, and there is the "Up close and personal" which gives a brief biographical sketch of a major Catholic individual who lived during the time of the events being currently discussed. I think these would make an excellent church history textbook for a Catholic high school or even an introductory undergraduate class.

Taking a thematic rather than a timeline approach to this [eriod, the book made it easy to see connections in events. The bulk of the book is three chapters. The first covers reformations in the Catholic Church before about 1500. The second covers Protestant Reformations in Northern Europe and England. The third deals with the Catholic response to these events.

The only real fault I see is that reformation events in France were ignored.

The author makes a statement in the foreword that he is offering history from a specifically Catholic perspective which is helpful to know. This is a relatively short book about a topic that has scholars with varying viewpoints have written tomes. Understanding what it is is will help the reader, the author really just hits some high points but I would not call it academic or scholarly. Now, that works for many readers who need something more accessible.
I personally was bothered by statements offered as fact by a historian who offers no footnotes or further comments for example in his chapter in Luther he says, " Interestingly, many of the books Luther tries to cast doubt on contained evidence of teaching he later contradicted in his own teachings, like purgatory or the intercessory prayer of saints." I find that a rather incendiary statement and to offer that with no footnotes or substantiation is rather mind-boggling.

#TheChurchandtheAgeofReformations13501650 #NetGalley

Those not willing or who do not have the time to tackle Diarmaid MacCulloch's The Reformation: A History will find a suitable alternative in this slim volume. Weighing in at less than 200 pages (vs. 800 for MacColluch's tome), much of the same ground is covered and, surprisingly, with the same amount of balance. Luther, rather than being portrayed as the devil incarnate, is instead shown in a rather sympathetic light. Whether, as I suspect, this is due to the authors' embrace of post-Vatican II Catholic theology, or an attempt to present opposition views in the best possible light is of minor concern - the process is followed throughout the book and allows it to surmount mere partisanship.

The book, authored by two educators, is written in lively, accessible prose, drawing the reader in with well-defined portraits of major players from all sides of the reformations. Terms are defined, ideas are explored, both commonalities and differences are fleshed out. In the work's conclusion, the authors explore the legacy of the reformations for today's faithful in a wide-ranging manner. This ends the book on a high note, leaving the reader with the desire to explore this era more fully.

The Church and the Age of Reformations is well suited for many purposes: as an introduction to the subject for teens and adults in both conventional and homeschool settings, as a resource and jumping-off point for further exploration, and as a quick reference. As part of the *Reclaiming Catholic History* series, it succeeds admirably and would be a valuable addition to any thinking person's library. Highly Recommended. Available April 2022.

This is is the first book on the Reformation Era that I have read from a Catholic perspective and I am so glad that I have! “The Church and the Age of Reformations (1350-1650)” by Joseph T. Stuart and Barbara A. Stuart wonderfully illustrates the validity of Yves Congar’s four principles for true institutional reform. The Stuart's recounting of history from this period shows us that, unfortunately for everyone's loss, the reformation era didn’t play out in full accordance with Congar’s principles.

The writing is clear, thoroughly engaging and accessible. I particularly appreciated the “Up Close and Personal” sections that presented brief biographies of outstanding saints of the reformation period such as St Catherine of Genoa, St Thomas More, St Theresa of Ávila, St Ignatius and others. As an open-minded protestant with an esteem for the Catholic Church, I was also grateful for the “You Be the Judge” pieces that laid out controversial issues from the era such as the inquisition, prayers to the saints and indulgences from the point of view of the Catholic Church and historical facts.

Whilst there are statements in the book that I would disagree with, I found myself in broad agreement with the Stuart’s conclusion of the necessity of holding the principle of reform in tension with the principle of apostolic authority in the church. Tragic human failings at either side of this equation resulted in some deeply damaging events in the history of the Church. The writers also rightly, I believe, identify the glaring weakness of the Protestant ethos of Scriptural interpretation by individuals in isolation from the Church community.

I highly recommend this book to anyone who is interested in Church History and the Reformation. I think that it is a particularly important read for protestant believers - not every Protestant Reformer was a faultless hero, not every Catholic leader from this time was a corrupt villain! There are pertinent lessons for our current era that we would be wise to pay attention to. As the philosopher, George Santayana said, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

“The Church and the Age of Reformations (1350-1650)” by Joseph T. Stuart and Barbara A. Stuart is the next volume in the Reclaiming Catholic History series, published by Ave Maria Press. You may think of this period of history as the Reformation. If so, the title will draw your attention. This is intentional. In their recent work, the authors contrast the Protestant Reformation with the concurrent work of Catholic reformers and attempt to show that the Protestant reformers failed. Rather than reform the Church, they “took the easier way out of creating separate ecclesial bodies.”

As a non-Catholic Christian, I was excited to read the Stuarts’ new book. I have looked little at this period from the Catholic perspective, doing so gave me a deeper understanding. “The simple argument of this book is that the Church in the Age of Reformations provides a case study of the principles of true reform and in the challenging conditions of the time that obscured them.” The authors consider pertinent history, followed by a survey of important Protestant and Catholic reformers.

Several factors challenged the Catholic Church. Previously illiterate masses had access to the written text through the invention of the printing press. People were ready to investigate matters on their own. Moral failures of the Church only increased this readiness. The authors do a good job presenting these failures, as well as the sins of the Protestant reformers. The non-Catholic reader may challenge the interpretation of certain events, but nothing more than expected in a discussion of this nature. I disagree with their recurring conclusion that the reformers should have followed the tradition of reforming the Church rather than leaving it.

The book leads one to believe that only by remaining with the Catholic Church can Christians achieve unity. As evidence for this, the authors point to the splintering of Protestant churches, all holding onto their personal interpretation of the Bible. So rather than relying on personal understanding, the tradition and teaching of the Church ought to have the final say. But why should Christians acknowledge the authority and tradition of the Catholic Church, which could come through the edict of an immoral man? Matthew 16.19. However, should one argue that the personal interpretation of the Bible can only lead to division, and then tie the solution to a personal interpretation of the Bible?

The authors did a great job explaining things that often puzzle. I appreciated the treatment of indulgences, the inquisition, and even the origins of different groups within Catholicism. Though I disagree with their view of biblical authority and salvation, they helped me understand the Catholic teaching on these subjects. The Catholic Church has a rich history of doing good and lifting the forgotten of society. The lives of individuals like Ignatius of Loyola make me want to do better.

I enjoyed the Stuarts’ latest work. I encourage you to pick up a copy and read it. It will inform your understanding of the period. Its depictions of men and women of faith may even inspire you to live better.

The latest volume in the “Reclaiming Catholic History” series documents the era from 1350 to 1650, incorporating the years leading up to the Protestant Reformation and its aftermath. The series aims to present an unbiased and objective timeline of “Christian history” - ostensibly a “just the facts” from “God’s point of view” - whilst making the story accessible and entertaining. I am not a Christian, but I applaud any attempt at an overview of history from a more honest and human perspective.
The title of the book is a statement of intent - this was the era of not just THE Reformation, but of many. The authors, Joseph T. Stuart and Barbara A. Stuart, offer a contemporary and modern reassessment of the Reformation that is never boring, writing accessibly and vividly to bring the era and it’s people to life. Towering historical figures such as Thomas More, Johanes Gutenberg (whose printing press would have a profound effect on the accessibility of the Reformation) and of course Martin Luther, a personal hero of mine. Rightly remembered as the instigator of change, this book shows that the genesis of that change had begun much earlier.
The book includes a chronological timeline of the era from 1350 to 1650, a map, bibliography and a full index. Sidebars entitled “Up Close And Personal” give concise biographies of the key players of the time, and the “You Be The Judge” panels invite the reader to make up their own mind about events and institutions such as the Spanish Inquisition; the latter having many of its enduring myths debunked.
This book was a refreshing read. It looks at history from a new perspective whilst remaining eminently scholarly, and deserves to be widely read.