I am very sorry, but I tried at least six times and can't get into this book. I am going to take the advice of some other readers and start with another Banville, e.g. The Sea. I found this too inaccessible.

After his release from prison, a man drives to the house where he grew up. Now, the Godley family lives there - the descendants of the late Adam Godley, the famous scientist - Godley’s demented wife, Adam Godley Jr., and his wife. The family takes the stranger in. Later, Adam Godley’s autobiographer joins them and moves in with the family, too.

Later, I found out that a few characters appeared also in other Banville's novels, and I didn’t read those. I think this is one reason I couldn’t connect with the characters and didn’t enjoy the novel.

Barnes uses such beautiful language. But reading this novel, I sometimes had a feeling that the author tried too hard. Maybe I would advise you to read this novel with the help of the dictionary. But unfortunately, it loses all the meaning and fun this way.

2.5 rounded to 3. I wanted to give this novel more stars. The writing was beautiful, but I think it was exaggerated. The plot didn’t move me at all. I was often confused, and the reasons for this are many, I suppose.

Apparently this book contains references to some of the author’s previous books. Maybe this would have been a more interesting reading experience if I had read those books. I actually enjoy the author’s use of language, and I have liked some of his books. However, this was pretentious. I’m sure he enjoyed himself writing this, but it felt very self indulgent. I don’t know what readers he had in mind. I like a plot, and characters who seem like real people. Nothing anyone did in this book made any sense at all. I actually made it through 70% of this book before deciding that I couldn’t take it any. I received a free copy of this book from the publisher.

Baroque structure for a perfect weekend read as long as that weekend is stormy. Banville's 'entertainments' are consistently excellent, and this ranks high among them. Read for the pure joy of the exquisite style.

I have enjoyed previous works by Banville but felt the writing got in the way of the story in this one. I can only recommend to folks who are familiar with his works and consider themselves fans.

This book was lost on me - I think I greatly missed out by not being very familiar with this author's prior work, now that I understand the premise. I found it dry and confusing.

I read this book in instalments. That's just how it is written. Like a lavish buffet. You can't take it all in at once. The USP of the book is its language, rambling prose which reads like poetry. This was my first Banville and I'm not sure if all his books are written like this. I;m definitely going to check some time. This one is not for everybody. Thank you Netgalley and Knopf Doubleday Publishing for the ARC.

It is evident that John Banville reveres words. His writing is overabundant with words: obscure words, inscrutable words, repetitive words, alliterative words. His prose is protracted and precise and plethoric. Why would something be bright when it could be effulgent? Why would someone watch their step, when they could move with guarded tread? It is impossible to read this novel and not be aware of the words, and the fact of their having been chosen, and the effect that the writing style has on the reading experience.

There is a simple story being told. But the story is secondary to the style. This is not a plot driven book. It is also not a character driven book. The Singularities is a language driven book. So I suppose it doesn’t matter that as much or more time is spent describing places and furniture and clothing as advancing the plot. And I suppose it means that I can DNF at 53% and still have gotten value out of this novel. I may come back to finish Parts 2 and 3 another time, but probably not. I still leave with an appreciation of John Banville’s talent as a writer.
I recommend this novel for readers who love to be lulled by the rhythms of language.

This was a very well written book, although the writing style was not my favorite. I think it will be very popular among John Banville fans though.

Keep a dictionary close by. This was the first of John Banville's works that I have read. A mysterious ex- con with a borrowed car drives to a home he had previously known to discover its name had changed and the current inhabitants know nothing of him. Still he stays much to the chagrin the the family. It consists of the son, daughter-in-law and wife of Adam Godley, a man who discovered the Brahmin Theory of Singularities. Something we are told changed the face of mathematics and scientific theories and ultimately the world. A Biographer is engaged to chronicle the great man's life, a pedantic admirer of Godley and upon his arrival he is instantly mesmerized by Helen the movie star daughter-in-law. The interplay between the characters and the truth about the great man consumes the rest of the story. Banville is a master at descriptions of everything and everyone. Fascinating. However I found myself looking up definitions constantly and at the end I still do not know what the Theory of Singularities is. Obviously Banville's goal was not to elucidate on that but chose to emphasize the impact of it on the characters. Character Studies

John Banville is an acquired taste, one I have never actually acquired, but I decided to give him another go with this his latest novel, and although I found it confusing – downright impenetrable at times – I did (sort of) enjoy the use of language, the wit, the playfulness and philosophical musings. Most of the time, anyway. It’s a difficult novel to summarise, as the plot is pretty much non-existent and the characters hard to relate to, and as so many other reviewers have already had their say, I’ll just state that multi-layered doesn’t begin to touch the sides, pretentious pretty much sums it up, and overall this is one for the literary geek rather than the common reader.

I discovered John Banville on Netgalley and loved each book i read. Excellent storytelling and style of writing, fascinating stories.
I loved this book and it's highly recommended.
Many thanks to the publisher for this arc, all opinions are mine

Published by Knopf on October 25, 2022

John Banville (at least when he writes under his own name) is among the greatest of the Irish prose stylists. He’s also a thinker who brings an element of playfulness to deep thought. Banville’s thoughts in The Singularities turn to the nature of reality, a question that joins philosophy and science. The novel seems to suggest that reality is what we make it. If that’s true, we should make it carefully.

Two narrative voices in The Singularities alternate and sometimes merge. One voice belongs to Professor Jaybee, who has been engaged to write a biography of the mathematician Adam Godley, creator of the Brahma Theory, a “dazzling re-statement of the fundamental nature of reality.” One component of the theory holds that any attempt to understand the universe contributes to its destruction. People literally deconstruct the universe by trying to comprehend its reality. That discovery gave birth to a ban on scientific inquiry, a shuttering of the science and math departments in universities. The theory also seems to have affected reality in an undefined way. New York is again New Amsterdam. The plague may have returned to Venice. A Manhattan and an Old Fashioned are now the same drink.

The other narrative voice tells the story in the third person. That narrator describes itself as a minor god or godlet, a child of Zeus. An omniscient entity is well positioned to follow a murderer once known as Freddie who took the name Felix Mordaunt after his release from prison. Yet the two narrators are not so different; when characters speak to the godlet, they seem to be looking at Jaybee. The only character who can see the godlet is a dog.

In postmodern fiction, anything goes — the more confusing, the better. One might assume that the godlet is John Banville, but who knows? Given the initials that combine in Jaybee’s name, a reader might also conclude that Jaybee is Banville. Perhaps the point is that every character in a novel is really the author, for characters do not exist until the author creates them. Or perhaps the nature of reality is that, at some level, we are all the same person traveling the same course we have traveled throughout the infinity of time, even if we believe ourselves to be individuals with free will and uncertain futures. “For nothing exists by itself, in isolation; there is only the continuum, in which everything presses into, bites into and extends from, everything else.”

Speaking of confusion, the novel warps the literary illusion of reality by bringing together characters and settings from Banville’s earlier work. Freddie murdered a maid in The Book of Evidence. He visits a resort that was featured in The Sea. The Godleys, Ivy Blount, and Duffy the cowman appeared in The Infinities. I’m sure there are other examples (I haven’t read everything Banville has written); those were the easiest for me to spot.

The confusion of reality and illusion is evident when Jaybee believes he sees Godley’s dead daughter Petra, or her ghost, and when Godley in his old age travels to Venice and wonders whether a woman named Cissy actually exists, whether Cissy is a projection of Petra, whether he is actually in Venice or inhabiting a dream. When Godley wakes from dreams, the real world he encounters seems like another dream. Perhaps the reality we all believe we experience is nothing but a dream. Perhaps being awake is just “another kind of sleep.” On the other hand, another character tells Jaybee that the letter in which Godley expressed those thoughts is just another of his lies. Reality, illusion, fiction, truth, lie — all inseparable and indistinguishable. Or not.

The Singularities is more a challenging work of philosophy than a traditional novel. Before letting it go, Banville begins to construct a plot with Felix’s release from prison and his travel to the house where he lived while growing up, in a place that is now unrecognizable to him because time has passed and reality has changed. Jaybee’s agreement to investigate and write about Godley’s life seems to furnish the second plot element. He meets characters who knew Godley, including his widow, whose dementia has altered her reality.

Jaybee apparently finishes a chapter of the biography; Banville sticks it into the middle of The Singularities. After that, any attempt at plotting is all but abandoned, as the story follows tangents related to Godley, all but forgetting Felix’s role in the novel.

So what’s left? Astonishing prose is the reward for sticking with the novel. One of the narrators of The Singularities describes an evening in New Amsterdam: “We had booze, broads, a barroom fight and a night in the cells, and in the morning a crapulous and shamefaced court appearance, followed by summary deportation and a thunderous warning never to show our faces in town again. No, of course we didn’t; honestly, you’d believe anything.” It is worth suffering the confusion of reading The Singularities just to encounter such passages. Some readers might find it worth reading twice to gain a more nuanced understanding of the points Banville is making, although it might be necessary to read or reread everything Banville has written to appreciate the novel in full. Lacking that kind of ambition, once was enough for me, coupled with my dim memories of the other Banville novels I’ve read. I wouldn’t rate The Singularities as my favorite of those (The Book of Evidence probably earns that honor), but I enjoyed nearly every page.

RECOMMENDED

I can definitely see why people like Banville, but ultimately this *specific* book was not for me. I think I need to head back into his previous work and read some more and then maybe revisit this novel, because ultimately this is an extraordinarily difficult and challenging novel to read. Well-written, but difficult, and something you have to stick through to get the full effect of the payoff.

unfortunately the writing style made it really hard for me to get into this story and truly enjoy it

I found this novel to be filled with pompous archaic language with a plot that was difficult to follow and weak, uninteresting characters. Obviously, this book was not meant for me.

Thanks to NetGalley and Alfred A Knopf Publishing for the ARC to read and review.

oh boy, this was a drag. i’m afraid i’m not the target audience, though i can sympathize as to why someone would be into writing such as john banville’s.

This one sort of missed the mark for me. It was hard to engage with, especially not having read many of the author’s other works. I chose it based on the cover which I found dynamic and eye catching, but the substance inside left me confused and a Banville newbie.

Thanks for the ARC - Not for me I'm afraid. A bit of a slog, pretentious language and unnecessarily long.

This is my first Banville - and it was a terrible idea to start here (I chose to because the novel is brand new and might get Booker-nominated). The whole text relies on the conceit that the author resurrects and brings back characters from different other novels and lets them interact. Additionally, there's a style over substance approach, a playful venture into alternate lives with alternate storylines within the story, which is already a riff on former stories - in "The Singularities", nothing is singular. So the question arises: How worthwhile is this if you're not a Banville stan who gets the intertextual meta-jokes?

What happens is apparently this: Mathematician Freddie Montgomery from The Book of Evidence is released from jail where he served time for murder. He now calls himself Felix Mordaunt and returns to his childhood home, where he encounters the Godley family from The Infinities - the late Adam Godley researched the (fictional!) Brahma theory which proves the existence of infinite universes and produced an interference effect in the world. Mordaunt/Montgomery becomes the driver and servant of Godley's son and daughter-in-law. Then, there's a biographer named Jaybey (J.B. - John Banville, get it?) who shows up aiming to write the life story of old Godley, who was his academic nemesis...

This constellation spreads out in various echos and references that underline the God-like position of the author who creates infinite universes and variations: It's a novel about contingency in writing, about the beautiful "what if" that is allowed in the infinite world of fiction, not in the singular world we actually inhabit.

I applaud John Banville for building his own, constantly shifting metaverse, for writing a book that certainly has great literary merit, but is also pretty much incomprehensible (at least when it comes to the really interesting parts here: The shifting references) for Banville newbies. You certainly can't claim that he's selling out or compromising his artistic vision, even though I, personally, am scratching my head while the novel leaves me cold. It was simply the wrong place to start.

Here's a superb review by Kevin Power that highlights all the Easter eggs I never could have found and thus illustrates how clever the writing actually is:https://www.independent.ie/entertainment/books/book-reviews/the-singularities-by-john-banville-complex-author-plays-brilliant-games-with-readers-42082051.html