Member Reviews

Ali Hazelwood's books are always fun, and this one is no exception. This is kind of the feeling I want when I'm looking for a lighter romance. That being said, this definitely isn't my favorite. I had trouble getting into it and really loving the characters. But I really enjoy the STEM romances and this is a solid one.

Was this review helpful?

I have no words, this book was absolutely amazing! I giggled like a school girl in some parts then was entranced by the spicy scenes. I love how Jack is just fully entranced by Elsie and how he just wants to take care of her. I canโ€™t wait for her next book to come out.
Thank you to NetGalley, the author and the publisher for providing me with a copy of this book in exchange for an honest review!

Was this review helpful?

This book isn't the funniest or most fast-paced, and yet weirdly enough I enjoyed it. No doubt or surprise that the STEM element is extremely well-written and my favourite part. I loved learning about the feud between theoretical and experimental physicists, the politics at play and all the struggles that exist in the industry.

Elsie's character development was great and I found her very relatable. The romance was cute. Even though the insta-attraction from Jack was not entirely convincing, he does say and so some pretty swoonworthy things, lol.

And the cameos!!! ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜: "They're the Mount Rushmore of STEM academia."

Overall, it's a pretty decent read but I feel irked about how the couples in every single Ali Hazelwood book always need to have raw sex and talk about raw sex. What's wrong with safe sex and protection? Seriously, I don't get it and after 5 novels of the same thing, it becomes a turn-off.

3.5โญ๏ธ

Was this review helpful?

Oh this was a fun book! The romance was messy and sexy and lovely. This book made me happy & made me smile.

Was this review helpful?

Quick Breakdown:

Enemies to Lovers
Workplace Adversaries
He Falls First
Diabetes & Demisexual Rep
STEM Romance
Slow Burn
Single POV
Open Door - Moderate Detail

Iโ€™m a little bit love drunk over this one.

I first picked up Love, Theoretically last month. I started with the audiobook, but despite enjoying the narration, I switched to the book because there was so much I wanted to highlight.

Going back through what I annotated for this review, I was so completely sucked back into the story that I quickly found myself rereading the book! So, when I tell you this book is GOOD, I really mean it.

Iโ€™m a big sucker for the uniqueness of a nerdy romance. Itโ€™s something I love & donโ€™t read enough of. Plus, Aliโ€™s writing is so addictive. I love how she continues to bring us these flawed yet relatable heroines working in STEM.

The steam here is so satisfying. The slow burn & insane chemistry between Elsie & Jack was EVERYTHING. Not to mention - Jack freaking Smith-Turner! He is my new favorite Ali hero. Iโ€™ll always be gone for the men who fall first. He was open & so supportive of Elsie despite coming off as a grump who disliked her at first. Such an ooey gooey cinnamon roll hero wrapped in a smart science package.

Was this review helpful?

Review will be posted on 6/7/23

Dr. Elsie Hannaway is at MIT as a professor of theoretical physics and hoping to gain tenure. She can barely scrape money to get by, so she moonlights as a "fake girlfriend." One night she discovers her favorite client's brother is none other than Jack Smith, an infamous MIT professor and the very person who possibly stands in the way of her tenure. As one would expect in one of Hazelwood's laugh-out-loud STEM romances, there's a lot of witty banter between Jack and Elsie. Also, there's a slow-burning enemies-to-lovers romance in Love, Theoretically filled with a lot of academic politics, too. Jack isn't just a well-known physicist, but also someone responsible for messing things up for her mentor. How could she have feelings for him? Perhaps it's his good looks and epic brooding? Or maybe she just wants to take him down -- academic style. Love, Theoretically by Ali Hazelwood is her third installment in the STEM romances and doesn't disappoint.

I think that Hazelwood's legions of fans will enjoy Elsie as she engages in romance, academic sabotage, academic politics, and tons of witty banter with Jack Smith in Love, Theoretically. While this wasn't my favorite of Hazelwood's romances, I still enjoyed it and it would be the perfect book to accompany a sunny day at the beach. I do feel that her romances are becoming a bit formulaic at times, but that didn't stop me from swooning right along with Elsie.

Was this review helpful?

I love that Ali Hazelwood has a formula that she follows for her heroes because I am going to gobble it up each time. So sorry to Adam and Olive but I think Elsie and Jack might be my new favourite Ali Hazelwood couple. I really enjoyed watching Elsie find herself throughout this book and watch her friendship and relationship with Jack grow because of that. ALSO the George twist and the cameo from Adam and Olive were 10/10.

Thank you to netgalley and the publishers for providing me with an arc for an honest review!

Was this review helpful?

I couldn't get past the "wet mess" of it all. Like truly AH writes absolutely horrifying sex scenes. But a deeper look:

The first 50% of this book is good - much better than TLH. It has so much tension and is funny and great. And then the books slogs under the weight of the Hazelwoodโ€™s tropey characters, ridiculous plot lines, exhausting and unbelievable lead woman and overbearing cinnamon role hero.

Folks at 63% in I couldnโ€™t handle Elsie. I think that my problem with her, and Aliโ€™s characters, is that she is so extremely smart in physics. But in everything else is just not. In a way that I struggle with. The missed social cues, the lack of understanding. There are little lines where he hugs her and sheโ€™s like โ€œwha-wha-what is happening what is he doing???โ€ And it feels so unrealistic. Aliโ€™s men sometimes feel like real humans but the women feel completely fabricated, and in a way that makes it so uncomfortable to read.

I find myself asking if her characters are neurodiverse, but I donโ€™t think sheโ€™s ever stated that (on page or in real life) and I feel like Iโ€™ve read really good neurodiversity in romance before.

My mind is all over the place but it feels like all her characters are โ€œwoman who is so smart but completely inept in every other wayโ€ โ€œastoundingly quirkyโ€ โ€œmisunderstands everything everyone is sayingโ€ โ€œmanic pixie dream girlโ€

Ar one point when Jack asks to โ€œtake Elsie outโ€ she says โ€œyou want to murder meโ€ and she is serious. Like this is not realistic!!!!!!! The sex scenes made me want to vomit (I donโ€™t even want to hear wet mess again in a book) and itโ€™s wild that Elsie can talk about an orgasm while she is IN A JOB INTERVIEW but canโ€™t say penis (literally she thinks he has an erection because he HAS TO PEE) and gets too uncomfortable to say anything during sex. This wild dichotomy feels so unreal.

Was this review helpful?

I am a fan of Ali Hazelwoodโ€™s books, and Love, Theoretically was another fun, sciencey enemies to lovers romance. I felt that Elsie and Jack both had more depth than some of her other characters. Jack was extremely fun to read and dang do I adore Millicent. I havenโ€™t read much if any diabetes rep and also donโ€™t see a lot of the deep academia rep you get here. It makes this feel different than other romance which kept me invested. I canโ€™t say it stands out very well from her other books/ novellas - all her books are starting to feel the same to me as they share many common elements that - even when they arenโ€™t - make the plots all feel nearly the same. That said, Iโ€™ll keep reading them, because theyโ€™re fun and Iโ€™m trash for these tropes and the banter.

Was this review helpful?

I loved this book! It was a one day read for me.

Elsie is a adjunct professor with a Ph.D. in theoretical physics. She's overworked and underpaid making extra cash through FAUX, an app that hires out fake girlfriends. When the opportunity of a lifetime arises, she quickly is thrown into the interview game for a professor position at MIT. The problem? One of the interviewers is Jack, the brother of one of her favorite clients. He is also the publisher of a paper that singlehandedly destroyed part of her mentor's career and caused a major rift between theoretical and experimental physics.

The chemistry between Elsie and Jack is amazing. The banter back and forth is a lot of fun. The characters also show a lot of growth through the book. Elsie and Jack aren't the only ones that shine through this book, there are also a lot of amazing side characters that hold their own in the story. I honestly would love to take a glimpse into some of their side stories.

Like her other STEM-centric romances, Ali Hazelwood successfully balances science and romance. On there romance side, there is plenty of spice as well. I tend to be a sex scene skipper; however, Hazelwood has a wonderful way of creating these moments with intimacy and combining it with additional insight into the characters.

I also liked Hazelwood's nod to the struggles of women in stem. Like her previous novels, she points out the difficulties and sexism met by women in the STEM fields and academe. Some of this is pretty on the nose and predictable, but is worth mentioning. There is also a nod to the need for women to support other women in the field.

Overall, Love, Theoretically is a smart, fun, and swoon worthy romantic read. Elsie's disappointment and self actualization brought me to tears while the conversations and banter made me laugh. So far it's one of my top romantic reads of 2023.

Was this review helpful?

Thank you so much to Berkley Romance, Netgalley, and PRH Audio for providing advanced copies of this! All thoughts and opinions are still my own.

There is something so comforting and wonderful about Ali Hazelwood's romances. I know exactly the type of story I'm going to get going in, and I fall in love with the quirky characters, pining hero, and hilarious banter every time.

This one, like Ali Hazelwood's previous books, follows a heroine in STEM. She is overworked as an adjunct professor and desperately wants to get out of teaching and into a full time research position. But when she finally gets an interview opportunity, a man on the committee knows her as his brother's (fake) librarian girlfriend.

I LOVE a pining hero and Jack delivered in spades. He is head over heels for Elsie from day 1 and she, in her awkward glory, is entirely oblivious.

This also has chronic illness rep that I really appreciated! The heroine has Type 1 diabetes and discuss often the financial struggles and burdens that come with chronic illness. I also loved the caretaking moments tied to this! A couple of times, the heroine's monitor fails and she has a diabetic crash. The way the hero cared for and helped her let me swooning.

If you've enjoyed Ali Hazelwood's previous romances, this one will definitely be a hit. However, if you're looking for something outside her typical work, this one is not. She did just announce a totally new paranormal romance for next year though!

Was this review helpful?

This one will sell well but sadly it wasn't for me. It felt like the same book over and over. The same exact tropes, themes, setting, and characters. I was looking forward to something fresh and new and this is not it. Thank you so much for the gifted copy but sadly it fell short for me.

Was this review helpful?

๐‘ณ๐’๐’—๐’†, ๐‘ป๐’‰๐’†๐’๐’“๐’†๐’•๐’Š๐’„๐’‚๐’๐’๐’š
โญ๏ธโญ๏ธโญ๏ธ
๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ ๐—ถ๐—ณ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ธ๐—ฒ: STEM romance, academia setting, fake girlfriending, diabetes rep

"๐—”๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ปโ€ฆ ๐—œ๐˜'๐˜€ ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ธ๐—ฒ ๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐˜€, ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ, ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—œ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ป'๐˜ ๐˜€๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฝ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟโ€ฆ ๐—œ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜† ๐˜„๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ด, ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜† ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜† ๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐˜€-๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—บ๐˜† ๐—ฏ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ'๐˜€ ๐—ด๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—น๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ.โ€

The Love Hypothesis has a very special place in my heart. Itโ€™s the first romance book Iโ€™ve finished after a year long slump and it made me want to read books about love again. Also, I really appreciate the women in STEM representation. Also Adam Carlsen - booksta husband of 2021 ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿฅฐ

Needless to say, everything that Ali Hazelwood writes, I immediately read. Iโ€™ve read her first 2 novellas and after finding the plot and character slightly similar to Olive and Adam (TLH couple), Iโ€™ve decided to skip the 3rd novella. Then Love on the Brain came out and I also felt the same. Still, I wanted to see if her 3rd book will be different, and unfortunately, it is still the same formula: quirky female lead and tall brooding male lead ๐Ÿฅฒ

I mean, I love it when my fellow quirky female nerds get representation but Iโ€™m certain women in STEM are not all quirky - if the author wants to stick with STEM romance (which is great btw, we need more of it), I just hope that she can create characters that are different than her previous ones. During Adam and Oliveโ€™s cameo scene, I get so confused with the dialogue because the 2 female leads and the 2 male leads almost have the same personality.

I like that this book featured politics in the academia setting (โš ๏ธ misogyny btw), the author tried to represent people with diabetes (iโ€™ve seen mixed reviews about people with diabetes liking/ disliking the representation though), I like that she loves Twilight and cheese, thereโ€™s also some character development arc for the female lead that I really appreciate.

If Iโ€™m rating this book as how good of a STEM rep it is, it will be around 4-5โญ๏ธ, but if Iโ€™m rating it as a romance book, I canโ€™t give it more than 3โญ๏ธ as I think Iโ€™ve already read this pairing 5x in total by the same author. :(

Will I still read a book by hers? I donโ€™t think so unless booksta FOMO hits and the 4th book cover is pretty again. ๐Ÿ˜‚

Anyway, I know a lot of people who loved this though, so still definitely give it a read. Your opinion might be different from mine and itโ€™s okay. We canโ€™t like all the same books, it will be a boring booksta world then.

๐Ÿ’ญ Whatโ€™s a book that you were looking forward to reading that didnโ€™t meet your expectations?โ€“

Was this review helpful?

This was another great STEM-focused, enemies to lovers romance from Ali Hazelwood! It was funny and sweet and I can't wait to read her next one!

Was this review helpful?

Thank you Berkley Romance for the gifted e-copy.

Love Theoretically is the next book in Ali Hazelwood's STEM romance series. Elsie is a theoretical physicist applying for a new job at MIT. Jack Smith is the older brother of the man Elsie is fake-dating and turns out to be the head of the interview committee - and also Elsie's experimental physicist nemesis.

This is an enemies to lovers, somewhat predictable book. The banter was fun, the sex scenes were kind of awkward though. The scene where Elsie and Jack have to pick up Greg from the dentist was hilarious!

4 stars. Now I need a book for Elsie's roommate and Kirk :)

Was this review helpful?

Elsie is theoretical physicist and an overworked and undervalued adjunct professor. Sheโ€™s living paycheck to paycheck, making ends meet by working a secret side gig as a fake girlfriend for hire. She plays her parts well - becoming the person everyone in her life needs but never truly being herself in the process.

Up for a position at MIT, she finds herself in a sticky situation, when one of the people on the hiring committee turns out to be her favorite clientโ€™s older brother. She finds herself instantly at odds with Jack Smith, who is not only an experimental physicist but the one who ruined her mentorโ€™s career.

I freakin loved Jack and Elsieโ€™s back and forth. He saw the real her and challenged her to grow and be true to herself and not simply play a character or try to please others. This was definitely more of a slow burn but the banter, the angst and the chemistry were sparks flying, sizzling.

Was this review helpful?

This is my favorite book by Ali Hazelwood. It offers a real view into the hierarchy of the academic world and I loved to see all the ND rep and the T1 rep. Jack was a really fun character to come to love alongside Elsie!

Was this review helpful?

Included as a top pick in weekly June New Releases post, which highlights and promotes upcoming releases of the month (link attached)

Was this review helpful?

There's just something about Ali Hazelwood's books that manage to hit the sweet spot for me. Are they trope-y? Yes. Are the romances predictable? Yes. Are they good? Yes. And will I read them over and over again? YESSSSSS.

I love the protagonists. Jack, especially. He was clearly a case of "I fell first" and honestly, it was a bit of a hoot to see how someone as smart as Elsie be oblivious to the fact that he cared for her. Which I can relate to a bit, because until someone tells me in no uncertain terms that they LIKE me, I probably wouldn't assume. Anyway. Jack. He was swoony. I absolutely fell in love with him. Elsie was endearing. Though I couldn't 100% get behind her people pleasing tendencies, I still sympathized with her, which is pretty much what you want as a reader. The side characters were a hoot as well, though I kept mistaking Greg for George and vice versa. Anyway. Absolutely enjoyed this book, just as I enjoyed every one of Ali's books. Highly recommend!

Was this review helpful?

liked this a lot and not surprised given the other books in the series. thoughtful characters as usual

Was this review helpful?