Member Reviews
While I enjoyed the story, overall, I really didnt like Dominic. I dont agree with the whole open marriage which is why i didnt like when he suggested anfreedom clause. but i liked this story and I would definitely read more by this author.
Thanks to netgalley and publisher. All thoughts and opinions are my own and aren’t influenced by anyine else.
I enjoyed some parts but not others. I liked the overall message of the book but not the execution at times. I didn't feel that interested in the characters themselves so was hard to be invested in their relationship issues.
The Freedom Clause by Hannah Sloane leaves the reader examining what a marriage really is. What lengths would you go to to keep your partner happily married to you? Dominic and Daphne have been together since college. They are each other's first loves and serious relationships. Five years into their marriage they decide to try something new to liven things up. This decision leaves them wondering if they'll ever be happy together again. Read and enjoy!
Feeling dissatisfied in their marriage, 20-somethings Daphne and Dominic decide to open up their marriage. They come to an agreement where they get one night a year off from their marriage. Over the course of five years, we get to see how it plays out for them, watching as it influences not only their marriage but who they are as a person.
This was a very respectable debut. While the idea of a freedom clause might sound kind of silly at first, Sloane used it as a jumping point to explore much more in depth concepts. She gave an honest look into what can happen in marriages over time, and how women's need are so often overlooked. I liked seeing Daphne's evolution over the course of the story, and how she showed a different side to typical gender roles in a relationship.
This was a quick read, especially since there are multiple pages of recipes throughout (Daphne's food blog), but the story felt complete and not lacking in depth. The story jumped from person to person a little, but I never found it hard to follow. I commend Sloane for exploring this topic, and for this well-done debut novel!
The Freedom Clause had a pub date of July 25th, so grab it now and let me know what you think!
Thank you to Random House Publishing Group, NetGalley, and Hannah Sloane for this ARC.
When you get your approved email from @netgalley on a book that hooked you the instant you read the synopsis, you read that book immediately, right? Not exactly, at least in my case.
I thought this was coming out in a week, but was able to also grab the audio to read along. And it made it such a fun experience. I adore listening and following along.
I really enjoyed this one.
A few of my favorite parts:
🍪the use of cooking/baking that was encouraged by the ongoings in Daphne’s life
🍪how Daphne had a realization of how she was being treated; which could be seen as “too late” to some, but it’s never too late to find your worth and move on from those wonky feelings/relationships
🍪how realistic this entire journey felt. I know a lot of people are always trying to find a book they can identify with and I think the Freedom Clause is a book that can be used in any certain situation. Like, I’m almost 32, I’ve never had a relationship, but I could see myself in Daphne.
All in all: what seems to be a nice little “break” for some people, can lead others to know they are better off in the long run. (This is my summary with a large vagueness, so IYKYK)
READ THIS DAMN BOOK. THANKS ☺️
Thank you to: @thedialpress, @netgalley and the one person who did the writing, @hannahsloane for my copy! Can’t wait for the next one 🥰
Daphne and Dominic met in college and married young. At twenty-five, domesticity has settled in. Dominic feels that sex has left their marriage and, in an attempt to revive it, suggests a Freedom Pact: one night once a year to have relations with a stranger, no talking to anyone about it, no affairs, and a different partner each time for five years. Daphne reluctantly agrees to it. The results are enormous for both of them.
I voluntarily read and reviewed an advanced copy of this book. All thoughts and opinions are my own.
Not what I expected from the cover - it's not a trashy romance novel.
I enjoyed this book. I loved Daphne and her recipes.
A fun read :-)
4 stars / This review will be posted on goodreads.com today.
I can tell you this after reading this book. I would never agree to anything even resembling a “freedom clause”. Even if I’d met the man of my dreams at 18, nope. This book proved that it’s a rope to hang your marriage on,
Daphne has always felt that she wasn’t the desirable one. The girl that everyone fell for. She was too bookwormish. Too curvy. Too everything. Until she meets Dominic. And Dominic adores everything about Daphne. Until he doesn’t.
They married very young, before either of them had much romantic experience. When their sex lives go stale, Dominic proposes one day of freedom a year to do whatever with whomever. Daphne is shocked and outraged, but she adores Dominic and doesn’t want her marriage to end. Maybe this is just what their marriage needs.
The book is broken down into before the clause and then the five years following. It is eye opening to see the changes that are affected in their marriage, but also in each of them. For one it is an awakening and a rebirth. For the other not so much. In the end, maybe it’s the right thing, or not.
While I was fully entertained by this book, and adored Daphne, it can also be a cautionary tale. Really well written and quite the page turner, I have nothing bad to say about it. It is a book that is proof that even the strongest marriages sometimes hit speed bumps. I enjoyed every cringe-worthy minute of it. OH and did I mention it’s a cookbook too!
Great novel. Lots of fun.
Daphne and Dominic are married college sweethearts. When they realize they’ve lost that spark, Dominic suggests having one night a year, for five years, where they can sleep with whoever they want (within the rules).
I wanted to love this book. The plot really intrigued me, and I was excited to read it. However it was hard to follow along. Maybe it’s just not the style of writing I prefer. There are weird page breaks throughout the chapters that would switch perspectives/scenes, and sometimes huge chunks of time would go by. I know there was a lot of time that needed to be covered, but it felt like it would skip ahead quite a bit in time with no resolution or follow up to the scene that just played out.
Some of the scenes were very short and would end as soon as something interesting was happening, but others would drag out. I got lost a few times and had to reread the scene. Sometimes I couldn’t differentiate between the voices of Daphne and Dominic.
While I didn’t really connect with any of the characters, the more I read the more I liked Daphne. You can definitely see her growth by the end!
Thank you NetGalley and Random House for an arc of this book!
Dominic and Daphne meet while in college and have now been married three years. Already their marriage is a little stale so Dominic suggests a Freedom Clause. The rules are simple and Daphne reluctantly agrees to the terms.
So that’s what it sounds like The Freedom Clause is about—except it isn’t. The Freedom Clause takes place over the five years of the agreement and is about Daphne and how she ends up finding herself over the period of the clause.
You will find yourself cheering Daphne and anxious to see how her life evolves because of the freedom clause.
While I enjoyed the story, overall, I don't believe I have ever disliked a character as much as I do Dominic. I disliked him when he suggested the freedom clause and my dislike only grew through the course of the book. Daphne grew so much over the years of the clause and had so many revelations in her life. The whole idea of opening a marriage to others isn't in my wheelhouse but the subject matter didn't interfere with my wanting to read the story. I would definitely read more by this author.
Daphne and Dominic are both 25 and married right out of college. Their sex lives seem to be dying and wondering what could save the marriage Dominic has an idea. For the next five years, they could each have a different partner for just one night in each year. There were rules such as no repeat partners and no partners among their families or friends. Would this sexual freedom help the marriage to flourish or will it kill it? So entertaining!
I voluntarily read and reviewed an advance copy of this book. All thoughts and opinions are my own.
I really enjoyed Hannah Sloane's new novel, The Freedom Clause. Dominic and Daphne are a young married couple who decide to explore a once a year hall pass with certain parameters. Of course things don't go as planned and watching their stories unfold is the centerpiece of the book. At first I thought this was going to be a formulaic read but instead I enjoyed Daphne's insights and watching Dominic figure out what he really wanted.
All in all a good read from a. new author. This book was provided by NetGalley and the publisher in advance for an honest review. The Freedom Clause is available now.
The Freedom Clause by Hannah Sloane
Published: July 25, 2023
The Dial Press
Genre: Marriage & Divorce
Pages: 328
KKECReads Rating: 4/5
I received a copy of this book for free, and I leave my review voluntarily.
Hannah Sloane grew up in England. She read History at the University of Bristol. She has dual citizenship and lives in Brooklyn with her partner, Sam.
“Really, what’s the worst that can happen?”
Daphne met her husband while they were at university. Neither was expecting to find there forever, but in the blink, they were married. Things have cooled, but their relationship is strong until an innocent suggestion becomes a plan.
This was an interesting storyline. I enjoyed how humor was mixed in; it helped keep the tone engaging and light. I wanted to like the main characters, but they were both problematic for me.
Daphne is intelligent. But she is also a people pleaser. She doesn’t like to say no or disappoint anyone. Dominic is emotional and needy. He lacks ambition and has minimal follow-through.
I found the communication between these characters troubling. They didn’t communicate well, and they were both naïve about how their disconnect led to more significant issues.
I love that Daphne finds her confidence and discovers a way to love and empower herself. And I saw the nod to it being absolutely fine to realize you have outgrown your partner and that pursuing yourself is alright.
I did appreciate that there were no name-calling, trash-talking, or dramatic moments. The crumble was conducted maturely.
This book was not at all what I expected! it was actually A LOT BETTER THAN I EXPECTED.
This is literary fiction, not a fluffy romance novel. These characters are serious, well educated feminists and the point they make for this freedom clause was interesting and insightful, very open minded and out of the box. There was a lot of food for thought. I thought this was a really well done book.
This was a very fast paced read. I started it and was more than half way through before I even realized it. I enjoyed the concept of one night off a year for Daphne and Dominic's marriage but have to say I was not surprised it didn't go as planned.
I loved that when the book started both Dominic and Daphne seemed very unsure of the freedom clause. Daphne more so than Dominic. It seemed to me that Dominic really just wanted to test the waters and see what he was missing. I love that Daphne seemed to become empowered as the years went on. I love that she found strength and confidence. Dominic just came off as selfish and weak. I was not surprised by the path he took and the way he caused Daphne pain. He was a very needy and dependent person; I know that he had feeling of abandonment and probably really needed therapy (which he finally seeks) but he just came across as small. I wanted to throat punch him more than once while reading.
I would recommend this book but be aware before going in that they agree to an openish marriage so if cheating bothers you, I would avoid this book.
Thank you to NetGalley and Random House Publishing Group - Random House, Dial Press Trade Paperback for the ARC of this book. All opinions expressed are my own.
😁 REVIEW😁
#TheFreedomClause by @hannahsloane
Thank you @thedialpress and @penguinrandomhouse for sending me a @netgalley link for this one! ❤️
Daphne & Dom have been together since they were 18 and one night Dom suggests a freedom clause. One night off a year to sleep with one other person. What could go wrong?
So much y’all. So much. But SO MUCH goes right. The writing for one goes extremely right. Sloane writes dialogue— bother outer and inner— that did not feel cheap or cheesy. It was well done and the character development in this novel is real.
The spice level is there for those who are here for that. But I here for Daphne. I loved her character and the sub stack she was writing in the book was so fun to read! 😂
Highly recommend this debut novel!
The Freedom Clause by Hannah Sloan is a novel outside of my usual murder mystery genre I read.
I enjoyed the stretching of my reading world.
It was a fascinating read of a couple that decided to liven up their marriage and Hannah Sloan hit all the right notes describing
how this affected their lives.
It’s almost like the author had lived and breathed this story and then wove the storyline to make you feel invested in the outcome.
I cheered at the ending, It was so satisfying.
#TheFreedomClause
#HannahSloan
#NetGalley
I loved this story! It was cute and very relatable. Daphne was the true star of this story and her growth over the course of five years was beautiful! What started out as a husband’s selfish motive turned out to be the stepping stone she needed find and secure the woman she was.
It’s a well written story and the recipes included were the icing on the cake.
“Life is messy and so is this chocolate lava cake.”
These characters lives are definitely messy, but the writing stays light and is interspersed with recipes, like a modern day version of Nora Ephron’s novel Heartburn.
Daphne even seems to live by Nora Ephron’s motto “everything is copy,” a philosophy that has always both impressed me and made me cringe (it feels exploitive when other people are involved). The extent of character/relationship degeneration did surprise me, given where they started. Also, despite sex being a core part of the plot, the sex scenes weren’t the kind to get you fired up, perhaps because the sex itself wasn’t really the point, it’s more about gender roles and female self actualization.
Enjoyed it overall.