Member Reviews

Ugh I was so excited for this book. This was one of my most anticipated reads! The writing turned out to be super dry and I really didn’t find this to be a feminist retelling of Macbeth at all.

Was this review helpful?

It was a pretty quick read, but satisfying and engaging retelling of the story of Macbeth told through the eyes of Lady Macbeth. I am a huge Shakespeare fan and especially of Macbeth. I am always amazed when someone is able to tell a story I know backwards and forward in new and interesting way. Dragons in Macbeth? I'm in.

Was this review helpful?

I'm a big fan of retellings, though some are certainly better than others. Fortunately, this falls into the former category. It's clever and well written and though I knew how the story would end, it kept me turning the pages. Recommended!

Was this review helpful?

I love Ava Reid's writting and I am so grateful that I had the opportunity to have read this book! I never really read Macbeth when I was younger but It was so easy to connect with this story and the characters.

Was this review helpful?

This was creepy with an excellently drawn atmosphere. I felt the claustrophobia of "Lady Macbeth's" position. I do agree with other reviewers who said they would've like to see her be less in the thrall of a random man and show more agency, but I also wonder how that would be possible given the time period and marriage.

The narrator was phenomenal; great accents and cadence.

Thank you NetGalley and LibroFM. I will purchase a copy for my library and share with my month Bestsellers group.

Was this review helpful?

This entire story is just wrong. Lady Macbeth, in this instance, is not a strong woman urging her husband to grab more power. She wasn't even middle-aged or experienced. Instead, she's a young virgin terrified of pretty much everything, including her own shadow. She is weak and not nearly as intelligent as she thinks she is. Supposedly, this is a feminist version of Shakespeare's character, but I think there was nothing wrong with the original character. She's one of the strongest, most independent female characters in his canon, and Ms. Reid turns the character on its head to make her weaker and less feminist. Plus, there is this weird hatred for all things Scottish threaded throughout the story that makes you wonder what happened to Ms. Reid to deserve the hate. It's been such a long time since I was this disappointed in a book.

Was this review helpful?

I love a Shakespeare retelling, and there's just *something* about Ava's writing that hits. every. mark!

Was this review helpful?

As always, I look forward to a new Ava Reid book. She has solidified herself as a “must-read” author for me over the last few years. Her books are sometimes a tough read, subject-matter-wise, but her writing is so compelling that I always end up compulsively reading her books late into the night, regardless of my current state of horror. This new book offers up a new take on Shakespeare’s “Macbeth” but told from the perspective of his conniving, powerful wife. This Lady Macbeth is a young woman forced into marriage by her manipulative father. Therefore, much of the book is focused on the power discrepancies between women and men, fathers and daughters, and wives and husbands. The latter, of course, deals heavily with sexual violence within marriages, and readers should be aware going in that this theme is heavily and directly explored. It is disturbing, as the story doesn’t shy away from the realities of Lady Macbeth’s situation. I felt that it took over the story entirely and was too much.
This Lady Macbeth is a much younger woman and one of the primary arcs of the story is her slow (very slow} growth towards embracing her own power and throwing off the shackles placed upon her. This is very different from the original character who, throughout much of the play, seems to be the real power and mind behind Macbeth himself. Ava Reid tries to portray this, but in my opinion, fails. There is a great deal of cowering by Lady Macbeth and she is portrayed outwardly as weak. There is also the addition of the fantasy elements, her abilities, witches, a secondary love interest that is definitely not part of the original play.
This story is dark and grim. The emotions that it gave me were despair, depression, and dread. Like Lady Macbeth, we are drawn into a near-constant state of tension and fear. It’s incredibly effective, and if it weren’t for the strength of Reid’s writing, could easily exhaust the reader.
I think this was a unique retelling of “Macbeth,” re-focusing the story on the women that surrounded him and the limitations placed on them by the fact of their sex. Readers who have enjoyed Reid’s work in the past will likely enjoy this one, but for me a disappointment.

Was this review helpful?

Thank you to NetGalley and Ava Reid for the advanced copy.

I wanted to love this book since I loved A Study in Drowning, but it missed the mark for me. Everything that was described about this book made me so excited for it and yet I was left feeling disappointed by most everything. The feminism, the magic, the world, the love- all of it left me wanting for something more or different, I’m not even sure.

I will say, I gave it 3-stars because Ava Reid is an amazing writer, and her prose were beautiful. I think the issues overall were with the story itself. Maybe I just wasn’t who this story was meant for, as I know many who have loved it, but I loved Macbeth and just feel this was missing something.

Give it a shot and see what you think. From reading it myself and other reviews, I believe this is one of those books you either love or don’t. So, give it a read a decide for yourself!

Was this review helpful?

DNFed (perhaps soft DNFed?) at 20%. (Rating 3 stars because I do love Ava Reid, but this book was more like a 2-star read for me, based off the portion that I read.)

I really wanted to love this book, because Ava Reid has done some fantastic work (particularly A Study in Drowning) and her writing is beautiful. There's no doubt that Ava Reid is talented.

However, I became so frustrated in the beginning of this book that I could not continue reading. The first chapter alone is so full of infodumping / exposition and switches back and forth between names and titles of characters (sometimes multiple times within a paragraph), that I was constantly flipping back to the dramatis personae and was still left confused. Now, I want to clarify by saying that I'm not averse to complex narratives, large casts of characters, or the use of cultural specifics. But there's a way to weave these things into the narrative in a way that doesn't give the reader an immediate headache. There were also many instances of Roscilla watching things happen and then explaining them to the reader in large chunks of narration, with little dialogue being exchanged.

I could still have excused this, because I've powered through plenty of books with rocky world setup in the beginning, but as the narrative continued I found that there were other larger issues.

For one, there was a concerning amount of xenophobia/prejudice against the Scots, depicting them all (and all their customs) as evil, backwards, oafish and violent simply for the reason that they were Scots.

Similarly, the "feminist" commentary was extremely heavy-handed. The reader was constantly being reminded of the patriarchal nature of the world in a very "telling not showing" kind of way. Every man was made out to be an irredeemable, misogynistic brute at heart, and this was again told to us rather than shown, creating inconsistent characterization. For example, Macbeth is described as a brute, but whenever he is alone with our main character Roscilla (Lady Macbeth) he is polite and decently respectful. So, he's a brute because he's a man? And because he shot a bird with an arrow as part of a wedding ritual to demonstrate his strength as a warrior?

The narrative also constantly emphasizes Roscilla's victimhood, and she lacks agency in ways that go beyond just "the patriarchy." Now, I understand women's power is often limited or perverted under the patriarchy, and even more so in earlier times, and I love me a good feminist commentary. However, women have always found a way to try to exert whatever power they can, and I didn't feel like that was happening. We were TOLD that Roscilla is a schemer, and she does start off some major events through one of her schemes, but it all comes across as selfish and naive rather than "morally gray" and intelligent. Like, she doesn't consider that encouraging her husband to start a war so she doesn't have to sleep with him would result in many innocent deaths until much later? And then is just like "oopsie, but they're all men anyway, and they're probably assholes to their families who'd be better off without them"??

Overall, I am sad to say that I was really disappointed by this book. I have loved Ava Reid's work in the past and I hope to again, but this was not for me.

Thank you to NetGalley and Del Rey for the e-ARC of this book in exchange for an honest review. All opinions expressed are my own.

Was this review helpful?

in ava reid’s bloody, gothic reimagining of shakespeare, lady macbeth reclaims her power.

lady roscille arrives in her husband’s court as a frightened bride, sent to wed a man renowned for his violence. she is a woman alone in a cold, brutal land. if she hopes to survive, she will have to rely on her own cunning and mysterious witchcraft.

it’s been years since i’ve read macbeth, but i love a morally gray FMC and roscille is exactly that. her transformation from new bride to lady macbeth is so satisfying to witness, but i also appreciated reid’s larger exploration of power, ambition, and women’s roles through not only roscille but the three witches, her handmaidens, and even her stepmother.

readers seeking a faithful macbeth retelling may be disappointed; reid takes liberties here and even i didn’t necessarily love all of them. i would have preferred more schemes and less magic, and the ending tied everything up a little too neatly for my tastes; it felt at odds with the majority of the book.

and i have to end on reid’s gorgeous, atmospheric prose. it is truly lovely, even at its bloodiest (and there is *a lot* of blood here), and effortlessly transports the reader to a dark, eerie castle in remote scotland.

Was this review helpful?

Ava wrote the perfect embodiment of Shakespeare's Lady MacBeth while somehow making her completely different. She is cunning and patient. She’s out for blood, but only for those who hurt her. And it’s about time we got to hear her side of the story.

More stories from the POV of historically-maligned women, please!

Was this review helpful?

I really enjoy Ava Reid’s writing and loved the writing style of this novel. I also enjoyed the approach to the retelling and reimagine of the original. I think what was missing for me was wanting to care more about our main characters and feel more of an emotional connection to them. This was a 3.5✨ overall for me.

Was this review helpful?

Before even reading this, I was a bit apprehensive about picking up another Ava Reid novel as I always wish to love one by this author, I found that her novel's typically don't work for me. This is, by far, my least favorite. I found this rather disappointing. Ava Reid's writing always draws me in and I was hopeful that I would finally find one to love.

This, though, had little that I really enjoyed. The supposed cunning aspect of Roscille didn't felt real and being singular from her point of view was exhausting. There were parts of this that felt thrown in just to make this a fantasy and I really just did not like reading this.

I am disappointed that I didn't like this but I do think that there is an audience that will truly love this book.

Thank you to netgalley and the publisher for the arc.

Was this review helpful?

Ava Reid hits again!

I've never been a big Shakespeare person, but this makes me want to dive back in.

Ava Reid's writing always pulls me into the atmosphere of each book she writes is amazing.

Was this review helpful?

What an interesting writing style. It was so beautiful. However, for the story itself I was not in love with Roscille or really connected with her even though she is a unique fmc. Definitely done in a different way than most books but I just didn’t connect with it very well.

Was this review helpful?

Ava Reid's Lady Macbeth bears no resemblance to Shakespeare's character, nor to the Holinshed's Chronicles where he drew his historical inspiration. Scotland and her people, culture, language and landscape are unrecognizable here. This novel cherry picks names of people and places of the actual Macbeth story from more modern historical sources, as well as the Bard's famous witches and their portents. But that's all readers get from previous tellings of Macbeth, which need not have been a bad thing. Lady Macbeth's back story and diving into her motivations and personality would have really given this novel dimension. However, that's not what readers are given about the young bride. There are several themes that arise multiple times in nightmarish fashion: animals' teeth biting, claws, sexual abuse, death, suicide, and lots and lots of blood. Only Freud could make sense of these psycho-sexual images. To the average reader they are disturbing and repulsive. This is "a tale... full of sound and fury, signifying nothing"!

Was this review helpful?

Uh, what was this?

I know Roscille is being made to seem like some perfect, pretty polyglot, but she comes off as dumb, gullible, and pretentious. But don't worry. She's not like the other girls.

The witchcraft could've been cool. It's not. We're stuck with veiled Roscille, who has magic eyes that make a man do anything. Except some men. They're immune.

We touched on Melusina, that mermaid myth I greatly enjoyed in the House of Plantagenet, but then it went nowhere. Seriously. It's never mentioned again.

If I see the words "King," or "Queen Hereafter," ever again, I will riot.

Again, after my Del Rey backlog is done, I'm out.

📚 Buddy read with Zana

📱 Thank you to NetGalley and Del Rey

Was this review helpful?

Lady Macbeth is a feminist reimagining of Shakespeare's Macbeth that gives a voice to the infamous villainess, Lady Macbeth. It is dark and gothic in atmosphere, disturbing in all the best ways, brimming with haunting metaphors and prose that is both poetic and raw, beautiful yet brutal.

This is a story of female rage, the kind that starts out quiet, cold and contained, that begins to simmer as the story progresses until it boils over and consumes everything in its wake. It is a rage that seeps through the pages, that imbues itself in its reader's minds, festering and building until reaching catharsis in tandem with Roscille. This is a story about a woman exploited, forced to weaponize her unearthly beauty, whose very survival depends on her embrace of the role of a villain. This is a story about a woman desperate to seize back her autonomy from a world that will not extend her its mercy, offering up endless cruelty instead, even if it means choosing, at the very least, her death.

I will never tire of singing praises about the way that Ava Reid writes about the female experience, and she, in turn, never ceases to amaze me with the way she continuously explores different aspects of it with each of her books. To me, Ava Reid's works combined are a tapestry of the female experience. She has created something truly special in writing Roscille's story and giving her a voice that echoes that of so many other women throughout history.

I've said this before and I'll continue to say it again and again: it is a gift to live in a lifetime where Ava Reid's books exist.

Was this review helpful?

People love this book. Just go to BookTok or Goodreads and you’ll see lots of love for it and really great reviews that talk in length about why this book is a masterpiece. And they are all probably accurate. The characterwork is really solid and Reid does a great job of humanizing one of Shakespeare’s main villains (she’s a villain, right? It gets unclear sometimes outside of like Iago).

“Gnome, it feels like there’s a but coming...”

Yeah…I’m just not a fan of Shakespeare inspired novels. I love gothic genre fiction but gosh once it adds Shakespeare into the mix, I’m out. Thus this book is a big “it’s not you, it’s me” book. It’s obviously a great book and you can see that from the countless other great reviews out there. I really like EmmaSkies’ reviews of it on TikTok but it just wasn’t for me.

Was this review helpful?