‘The King’s Mother’ follows Annie Garthwaite’s debut novel ‘Cecily’, and is about the later life of Cecily Neville, the mother of Edward IV and Richard III. It begins in 1461, with the coronation of Edward IV, and ends in 1485, after Bosworth and the end of Plantagenet rule.

I loved ‘Cecily’ and hoped for a sequel, so I was delighted to read this. I absolutely tore through it. Cecily wasn’t a cuddly mum, but she was fiercely loyal to her family, and would do anything for them. Cecily is the chief focus of the book, but there is one other character who I found enthralling. That is Margaret Beaufort, who at the end of the book becomes the King’s mother, when Henry VII is crowned. She really is a match for Cecily, and in another life they could have been friends.

This is a different slant on a well-known story, about the woman who was the power behind the throne (a cliché, I know, but accurate I think).
Definitely a book to add to your Ricardian fiction list!

Thanks to Netgalley or the proof.

This was an intoxicating story of strong females, power balances and medieval history.

This book has reminded me just why the medieval period is one of my absolute favourites. From the politics, to the characters, to the 15th century world, Garthwaite captures everything in this stunning read.

This novel is rich with historical detail, charting the lives of Cecily Neville, Duchess of York and her sons, friends and enemies.

Having not heard much about Cecily Neville, this novel gives her a voice and has rebirthed her legacy centuries later. Garthwaite paints a vivid picture of this powerhouse of a medieval woman, bringing her back into a well-deserved spotlight. Not only is Cecily presented as intelligent, strong and fearsome, she is also shown to be a tender mother and friend. This book is an admirable tribute to the self - titled “The King’s Mother”.

The lives of other women are also introduced in this novel, such as Margaret Beaufort, mother to Henry Tudor, with whom she shares a complex but respectful relationship. There is also Elizabeth Woodville, wife to her son King Edward, and Marguerite of Anjou, once Queen of England.

Not only are the characters beautifully brought to life, but the way in which Garthwaite tells the story is also admirable. The writing style is punchy, fast-paced and to the point. This style helps chart the turbulence of Cecily’s life, and also lends itself to Cecily’s indomitable nature. The overall effect was a rich reading experience.

This was an in-depth, fascinating and splendid story that brings the incredible Cecily Neville to life.

Let me state from the outset, I am a history nerd and this book sent me down rabbit hole after rabbit hole. My favourite type of book to read and I could not ask for anything more! I first read Annie’s book, Cecily, three years ago and gave it five stars. It was epic! There is historical fiction and then there was Cecily. WOW! This was purist historical fiction at its best - one of those rare and memorable tales that gives voice to someone I had barely heard of but would now forever remember. Set at the conclusion of the Hundred Years War between England and France, and moving to the beginning of the Wars of the Roses, the first book focused on the life of Cecily Neville, Duchess of York, mother of King Edward IV and Richard III and a force within her own right.

‘Cecily the King’s Mother, a title no woman in England has assumed before.’

The King’s Mother is her follow up covering the period of ‘the Wars of the Roses to the dawn of the Tudor age, this is a story of mothers and sons; of maternal ferocity and female ambition - of all they can build and all they can destroy.’ Yup! That about sums it up. I do recommend you read Cecily first as this book picks up right where that one ended with her son Edward on the throne (Cecily is still the main narrator).

‘And so, though she kneels at His altar, Cecily doesn’t so much pray to God as stare him down. Don’t you dare, she says in her heart … say nothing.’

Annie effortlessly regales a complicated time in English history, however, by telling the story through the perspective of Cecily as the ‘King’s Mother’, makes it vivid and compelling. To witness her interactions through her sons and other characters such as Margaret Beaufort is mind blowing. Despite of course knowing how history ends, the magic of Annie’s writing keeps readers on the edge of their seats in anticipation for the conclusion. Think on how history presents certain events and people …. and then think again. Think of the negative light in which Richard III is portrayed and then think again. Think of the legend of the Princes in the Tower and then think again. Outstanding historical fiction.

‘Tomorrow she might be King’s Mother again. Or just another broken woman, with her children dead at her feet.’

One cannot help but be impressed with the depth and breadth of her research and then the very fitting interpretations. To craft a story that reads so well for today’s audience is impressive. I thank Penguin Publishers UK for reaching out once more and offering this follow up book. If epic historical fiction is your thing, be sure not to miss Annie Garthwaite's incredible series.








This review is based on a complimentary copy from the publisher in exchange for an honest review. Opinions expressed in this review are completely my own. The quoted material may have changed in the final release.

I thoroughly enjoyed this book; never a dull moment. Much is written about the Tudors, focussed on Henry VIII, and little on who and what came before. The King’s Mother does a very good job of opening that door.

Totally amazing that there was so much manipulation going on of people and situations considering the lack of anything other than backdoor "diplomacy", the sword and having the right son or daughter as a bargaining chip.

If you think that cliques and who/what is in and who/what is out is a new phenomenon invented in the early part of the 21th Century, treat yourself and read The King’s Mother and discovery how unsubtle we really are and discover real history in the making.

👑 THE KING’S MOTHER 👑 by @anniegarthwaite

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

I fell in love with Cecily last year and as soon as I saw this pop up on @netgalley I knew I had to click on this straightaway. Often when a book is so built up it very rarely deserves the hype that surrounds it. Nope, not this one. It deserves every praise it receives. I’m very read numerous books based on this period of history and none have hit like this. Cecily is an all rounder, a game player, king maker, political mastermind, bad ass, loving mother, grandmother and sympathetic friend. The action was fast paced, it’s probably one of the most factious periods of history ever, constant skirmishes, battles and petty arguments resulting in betrayal and devastating consequences. There’s nothing not to love about this book. I can’t wait to read more from Annie 🙏🏻

This is not a critique, analysis or essay but quick, overview intended to give you some idea whether or not you might enjoy an author’s work.

NO SPOILERS:
(Although it’s not really possible to have no spoilers when the story is true, is it?)

The King’s Mother is the continuation of the true story of Cecily Neville as recounted in the book Cecily, which I loved and have previouslyt reviewed.

Now, Annie Garthwaite cannot take credit for the plot and story (which is excellent) but she deserves all the credit out there for the wonderful, skillful way this is written. Her style since Cecily has evolved and become even more immersive. I was there with Cecily, standing beside her, sharing her anguish and joy, feeling the cold rain, the calm, warming sun. We are treated to Cecily’s inner thoughts, albeit imagined but so thoroughly researched they are perfectly plausible.

Cecily was a big win for me; The King’s Mother is a triumph, expertly researched and beautifully written.

Also, Annie Garthwaite is just lovely, approachable and generous.

I read this recently and, as with Cecily, became rabidly indignant on Richard's behalf. It convinced me that I must visit his tomb, so did the visitor centre and Bosworth. I told most of the people I met about The King's Mother and what a fabulous book it is.
Annie Garthwaite is an extraordinary writer.

A very enjoyable book even though I had not read Cecily. Despite reading the list of characters, I did find it difficult at first to get them all straight in my head. The author manages to make history come to life and corrects some of Shakespeare's inaccuracies.

I was hyped to read The King's Mother, and follow Cecily through to her son's reign. I liked how female-focused it was, with the relationships between Cecily and Jacquetta and Elizabeth, although I did miss Cecily's husband Richard and their bond. Annie Garthwaite is really good at the tense scenes where something has gone wrong and they're waiting to see what happens; you really feel the sense of futility as strong and clever and astute women have to wait for the men to sort things. But I enjoyed it less overall – even though they obviously lived in a chaotic period and that has to be represented, the hurried scenes felt even more pronounced and like each scene was rushing into the next. I wanted more chill moments of everyday life, because those were so good, and then there would have been more breathing space after each rebellion/battle/betrayal.

But I also think I liked this book less because Cecily was less likeable; she can be really bitchy, and I liked her when she was warmer but still as practical and resolute. Same goes with Elizabeth Woodville; her characterisation felt quite different to a lot that I've read about her, and I wasn't keen on it. I guess the characterisation thing is unavoidable when you've read as much about the Wars of the Roses as I have – I've very much formed an opinion about all the people by now, and it's annoying when I disagree with a fictional portrayal. Although, saying that, I did enjoy Richard III's character much more than I was expecting.

Anyway: still a reading highlight of the year and one I'd like to revisit – but I definitely think this should have been three books rather than two!

Cecily Neville's son Edward has crowned himself king of England. But old King Henry VI, his French queen Margaret of Anjou and their son Edward are still fugitives. Meanwhile, Cecily's cousin Warwick also wants his share of power. And then there are her younger sons George and Richard who must each find their way as heirs to the throne in this new York dynasty.

I really enjoyed reading Cecily, Garthwaite's debut novel about this fierce York woman, mother to the dynasty. And my review ended with me hoping Garthwaite would write a sequel. Two years later, The King's mother picks up where Cecily ended. At the start of the reign of her son Edward IV. Now Cecily is the king's mother and The Wars Of The Roses are far from over. The pace of the novel is fast, a lot happens and there are many characters. Cecily is involved in a lot of intrigue and tries to make the right decisions to keep her family in power, even when her sons marry the wrong woman or rebel against their brother.

The pace and the short time that can be given to any event as a consequen, leaves little time for emotions and depth. And that's the only fault I can find to Garthwaite's writing. It's quite straightforward, a little dry at times and not very emotional.

At the same time, the various characters are well developed and there is a clear focus on the women: Margaret of Anjou, Margaret Beaufort, Elizabeth Woodville, Jacquetta Of Luxembourg…

This is obviously a pro York book and Cecily has been a main character before but in this book there are a few interesting things that Garthwaite highlights (there might be some small spoilers involved here, but as it is history, I believe I can mention certain outcomes already):

Margaret Beaufort is three-fourths of the book also pro York, very likeable and a friend of both Elizabeth Woodville and Cecily. This Margaret was likeable. And this is literally the very first time in a pro York book that she is portrayed like that. The turnaround to the Tudor house also feels like a normal switch. Margaret learned a lot and at the end uses York's tricks for her own son.

George, Duke of Clarence is a complete vain idiot from the beginning of the story and Cecily thinks so too. Whereas history seems to suggest that George was her favourite son and Cecily was against his execution, here it's Edward for whom she fights and she stands behind him rather than behind George. For this book, this choice was ok, but I still think George's death must have hit much harder for Cecily.

Cecily's relationship with Edward's wife Elizabeth Woodville was interestingly portrayed. Cecily will never have been pro the match but she did had to defend the Woodvilles. Until Edward dies that is.

I find Cecily's switch to Richard the most difficult part of the plot, because suddenly she goes along with erasing everything Edward - her favourite son - would have wanted. So also goes along with Richards suddens executions of for ex. Hastings and Anthony Woodville, while Hastings was portrayed as a friend of Cecily... It's strange that Cecily doesn't question her youngest son's actions. But well, if you want to portrat Richard III positive, it's not an easy road for any writer.

No blame is placed on the disappearance/death of the princess in the Tower at Tudor or Margaret Beaufort. Which is usually the case in pro York books. No blame is placed on Richard either :), because Richard is again a saint in this book. I personally don't believe any of the later pretenders was one of the princes, so I didn't follow that part of the story either. But it is possible, so it may be written this way.

These two books about Cecily Neville are a very good duology about the Wars of the Roses from the point of view of a woman who experienced everything herself and drove certain decisions. I wonder who Garthwaite will write about next.

Thank you to Netgalley and the publisher for a copy of this book in return for my honest opinion.

Annie has made a complicated period of history that bit more compelling by telling it through the eyes of the mothers involved. It’s a great follow on from Cecily and it was nice to hear more about the powerhouse of a woman she was. Whilst this book is obviously fiction, it really does bring life to this period of history.

Having loved Cecily, I was very eager to get my hands on this and was not disappointed - despite me being busy and so reading it very slowly, it was compelling throughout, beautifully written and had the mark of good historical fiction for me: being hooked, even though I know what’s going to happen.

The King's Mother is the sequel to Cecily, the outstanding historical novel that centred on Cecily Neville and the rise to power of her son Edward IV.

In the previous book, the Duchess of York was controlled and measured, dominating every scene and pulling the strings behind the scenes. As Edward takes the throne, Cecily now also ascends to the powerful position of the King's Mother. However, we see a different Cecily in this book. Here, she seems more vulnerable, more out of control, more manipulative and vindictive.

Naturally, Garthwaite's story is dictated by history, but from a likeable and readable character point of view, I found this ruthless era of Cecily's life harder to stomach. Whereas before I was inspired by placing a strong female character at the centre, here I often found Cecily's actions difficult. She's often isolated, caught adrift, trying to cling on to the power through any means possible. In many ways, this is the story as her family, her country and, indeed, herself, spiral more and more out of control.

Still, it is a privilege to read a historical novel set in an era I have had little interaction with before. Furthermore, Garthwaite is an accomplished and thorough author and the story is engaging again throughout. I enjoyed the first novel more, but I would definitely recommend this one as well.

‘Cecily, the King’s Mother.’

In Ms Garthwaite’s first novel, ‘Cecily’ we met Lady Cecily Neville on 30 May 1431. Then aged sixteen, Cecily was watching the execution of Joan of Arc. ‘Cecily’ covered the period from 1431 to 1461, when ‘The King’s Mother’ opens. Edward IV, aged eighteen, has taken England’s throne from Henry VI. Cecily, titled the King’s Mother, stands ready to advise him. Edward’s position is precarious. Not everyone sees him as the rightful king. Henry VI’s wife Marguerite of Anjou fights for both Henry and her son Edouard; and Margaret Beaufort, mother of Henry Tudor also has an interest.

War is never far away, and Edward cannot always rely on his own family. His cousin Richard Neville, Earl of Warwick, known to history as the Kingmaker, because of his role as the arbiter of royal power during this period. Edward’s marriage to Elizabeth Woodville alienated Warwick as he had hoped to marry Edward to a French noblewoman. Cecily trod carefully: aware of Warwick’s power, conscious of Edward’s failings, and of her second surviving son George’s ambition. The House of York may be ascendant, but for how long? The Lancastrians have not given up hope of regaining the throne.

I enjoyed Ms Garthwaite’s novel. Her portrayal of the period is from the perspective of four of the strong women involved: Cecily Neville, Margaret of Anjou, Margaret Beaufort and Elizabeth Woodville. And, while I understand each of their motivations, the character who makes the most impact on me is Richard, Duke of Gloucester (briefly Richard III).

Ms Garthwaite presents the convoluted history of this period in a way which brings the historical players to life. Cecily is an astute realist, perfectly placed as the main character in this well written work of historical fiction.

Highly recommended.

Note: My thanks to NetGalley and Penguin for providing me with a free electronic copy of this book for review purposes.

Jennifer Cameron-Smith

A different story about the days of the War of the Roses.. I really enjoyed reading this story. The characters were well described and fely very real. The story had a real atmoshere and all thre ends were nreatly tied off.

I was surprised to see it’s almost three years since I read Annie Garthwaite’s debut novel Cecily, about the Wars of the Roses told from the point of view of the Duchess of York. That finished as Cecily’s son Edward claimed the throne of England. The King’s Mother picks up the story in the same place: Cecily is in London awaiting Edward’s return from victory at the Battle of Towton. Telling the story from a woman’s perspective means we see battles in her mind’s eye or hear about them in reports brought to her. I’m not averse to a decent battle scene but this approach leaves more space for personal stories and court machinations.
The book could easily be over-serious given the subject matter but there are light touches, not least in Cecily’s inner monologue. I like how her relationship with Jacquetta Woodville is portrayed; yes, there’s some sourness there but they have a shared past and both have the best interests of their children at heart.
The writer of historical fiction has the benefit of portraying their characters as they wish, even if it does fit around the few knowns. Here, Richard is thoughtful and uxorious (until his volte face from ever-loyal brother to thwarted protector), Elizabeth peevish (in contrast to the serene partner of Philippa Gregory’s The White Queen). Garthwaite has included a little foreshadowing: Cecily doesn’t trust Margaret Beaufort’s husband Thomas Stanley who will go on to have fatal influence at the Battle of Bosworth; she realises too late that she should not have been so sympathetic to Margaret herself.
It's hard not to consider the contingencies upon which the fates of nations hinge: a loss or victory in battle here, an heir surviving or dying there. What if Edward had survived until his sons were grown up? A joy of this period is that even if you’ve got a good grasp of the people and events, there are still so many twists and turns that it’s compelling reading: whose side is Warwick on this week? (Spoiler: his own.) If you fancy a look at the reigns of Edward IV and Richard III through their mother’s eyes, this will hit the spot.

“But there are men – ‘Always, there are men,’ complains Cecily – who jostle and push for power.”

This brilliant book (UK release 11 July) follows Cecily with the same clarity and vigour as Garthwaite’s prior book, taking us through the triumphs and tragedies of the final years of Plantagenet rule.

The author performs a miraculous alchemy in these books: the human stories at their heart ebb and flow with the tide of history, but are never swept under by the weight of it. She brings us a pacy, gripping, story of real people trying to do the best for their families and their country in unstable times.

Though Cecily is the protagonist in both books, and we admire her capability and resilience, the same qualities are present in the women who stand against her, something Cecily herself acknowledges. The sins of her enemies are so very often sins of her own.

These books are promoted as feminist retellings of the Wars of the Roses. I’m clearly not qualified to assess that either way, but Annie Garthwaite doesn’t approach this by depicting her characters as temporally displaced 21st century people. Her characters are wholly of their time: a time which is constitutionally patriarchal and where dynasties are forged through advantageous marriages and the children they produce.

It is here that Annie Garthwaite foregrounds the intelligence, durability, and influence of the women in the rival families as they circle each other: testing, observing, vying for dominance. We are shown the ways in which wives, mothers, and sisters use their skills and familial bonds to press an advantage. We also see the ways the men can bring crashing defeat to the jaws of victory because of their lust, greed, and pride.

This is the story of the ruling class. Though we don’t spend much time with the commoners we do feel their weariness with the endless years of war. Every triumph brings a challenger, every truce sits uneasily. The people of the country want peace, but a peace that is definitively won, not parleyed and strained.

This is a gripping and moving tale, even if you know the history going in, and a stellar sequel to Cecily. Marvellous.

As brilliant as Cecily! I really can’t get enough of this author. They’ve made me really invested in a period of history I didn’t really know much about and it’s all thanks to their ability to give a powerful voice to the women in history. Can’t wait for whatever they write next!

After really enjoying Annie Garthwaite’s previous novel Cecily, last year, I was excited to be able to continue to read the story of Cecily Neville. As wife of the powerful Richard, Duke of York and then mother to two kings, Edward IV and Richard III, she was without doubt one of the most important women of the period and it was fascinating to see the events of the wars of the Roses from her point of view.
The story picks up in 1461 when Edward has been crowned king and follows the story of his reign and that of his younger brother Richard. Edward is the focal point of Cecily’s life, he is her sun, the centre of her life and the author shows us clearly how determined Cecily was that he should be secure on his throne.
The book is written in the present tense which has the effect of making events feel very immediate and I found it quite hard to put it down at times as the story races through the final years of the Plantagenet dynasty. As we see things unfold from Cecily’s viewpoint, it’s a very different story to other books about the same period. We don’t see any of the battles or campaigns but only hear about them second hand as Cecily and the other women have to wait impatiently for news. This meant that there was a lot more emphasis on the political manoeuvring that went on behind the action which was an interesting take on the events.
I loved the portrayal of Cecily and the relationships with her family. She loved Edward almost to the exclusion of all of her other children and her daughters seemed to only really be pieces that she could use in a giant game of chess. The relationships between her and the other significant women of the time were well done. I really liked the way Margaret Beaufort was written although Elizabeth Woodville was portrayed a lot less sympathetically.
Historical Fiction that stays so close to real events is never going to have a happy ending and the events such as what happened to the Princes in the tower have been debated by historians for centuries but Annie Garthwaite does a great job of keeping the reader’s interest. The amount of historical research that must have been carried out is clear to see as the author steers a clear path through the different controversies about the events of the final few years of the book.
I was really interested in the appendix which showed what actually happened to Cecily, Margaret and Elizabeth Woodville and I feel that the fact Cecily lived to such a great age and on apparently good terms with Henry VII says a lot about the force of her character.
This was a thoroughly enjoyable read about the last years of the Wars of the Roses and I am grateful to Net Galley and the publishers, Penguin General UK, for allowing me to read this ARC. All opinions and thoughts are my own.

As a follow on to Cecily, The King's Mother is bound to be more interesting with its topic. It's the part of the narrative that is super juicy and as a lover of all things War of the Roses, I was eager to read the sequel. Unfortunately, even with the more substantial plot to delve into, it doesn’t exactly improve the faults of Cecily.

In my personal opinion, what makes the War of the Roses are the players. Especially the women. If you know little to nothing of this topic, I see this book being very one note. If you do know anything, this book is still missing a beat. The lack of characterisation for a plot-leaden book does nothing to serve even our main character, Cecily. She is sort of played to be this mastermind behind the kingdom, but it just doesn't fit at all. She is not written to be a very compelling character or one you'd root for, and all other female characters are criminally underdeveloped in my eyes with Elizabeth Woodville being probably the biggest victim.

Also, the writing style is not to my personal taste. It's a little too distant and cold. I would've loved a more intimate account of this time era. Instead, we have quite a bland entry.