In her latest endeavor, Rachel Cusk boldly challenges conventional novel structures, urging readers to perceive her collection as a cohesive entity intertwined by its diverse explorations of art. Rather than focusing solely on artists or their creations, the narrative centers on those in their orbit, examining the profound impact of love, whether present or absent, especially within parent-child relationships. Cusk's adept deconstruction of traditional narrative conventions culminates in a masterful piece of literature, where the interconnectedness of characters and themes creates a compelling and thought-provoking narrative tapestry.

A distillation of Cusk at her best. While more episodic than her previous novels, it is equally sharp and elegantly philosophical.

This novel contains four parts touching on very Cuskian themes: truth, art, reality, morality, motherhood, freedom, the self. It lets the reader in on feasible situations, scenes, or conversations where seemingly straightforward circumstances complexly illuminate and question what people appear to know about themselves.

At first, I was afraid I stood at a distance but soon realized I had been tingling with Cusk’s perceptiveness all along. I was relieved to surrender to her signature incisiveness, sophistication, and interiority.

Parade made me feel a heightened suspicion towards humanity and somehow more compassionate at the same time. Cusk’s writing reminds me that what we pursue, as well as what we concretely refrain from, inevitably reveals what we think life is about. It destabilizes the notion of an identity since we might see who we are from the sum of our actions, responses, and restraints.

Thank you to FSG for the ARC.

I’ve tried so hard to get into this book. It should be one I would enjoy, but I cannot hang it together in my head. I’ve read and enjoyed this author before, but this one is for other readers.
Thanks Netgalley and the publisher for giving me access to this novel.

It has been a long time since I felt quite so challenged—indeed, often stumped—by a work of fiction. Since a book so thought-provoking and strange left me at a loss to articulate quite what it was that made it so. I will get back to this question in a moment.

“Parade” is a series of tenuously linked vignettes, most involving different artists named G. Some of these vignettes are paused and picked up later, as if the narrative itself were drifting in and out of consciousness. Some are told in the first person; a few appear as stories told by a group of dinner companions, in a manner reminiscent of both Cusk herself (as in the amazing “Outline” trilogy) and maybe even “Decameron.” It then crescendoes in a visceral concluding “we” section, immediately calling to mind Annie Ernaux.

What links these disparate parts together is not so much a voice—because the voices here are many—but preoccupations: with the meaning of perspective in art, as in marriage, as in parenthood, as in the embodied living itself. There is a faint call-and-response pattern between how these preoccupations are explored across the various sections, but nothing ever adds up to a pocketable, proclaimable manifesto.

And that brings me back to what makes this work so challenging to sum up. As so many great works of art, it defies summation: instead, it provokes the mind to arrange and rearrange the parts—here, the stories—until a new meaning emerges, which the mind can then accept or reject, before embarking on a still new search. In a way, the writer’s contribution is to make space for the reader’s own creative process, to anoint the reader as a creator of meanings in her own right.

One final word: none of this should obscure how amazing Cusk’s writing is. The final section in particular is staggering in its beauty, wrenching in its ardor.

As always huge thanks to the ever-generous Farrar, Straus and Giroux for an ARC of a book that will not be lacking in enthusiastic readers and animated reviewers.

A novel that commands and demands your attention. Clear your mind, get ready to concentrate, and follow along as you encounter a series of Gs and explore themes of creation, gender, ambition, violence, motherhood, marriage.

Like a work of art hanging in a gallery, Parade invites you to take a close look and feel (and interpret as you wish).

Thank you very much to Farrar, Straus and Giroux and NetGalley for the opportunity to read a copy.

Rachel Cusk continues to deconstruct the traditional form of a novel, daring the reader to regard this collection as a single work unified by explorations of art in many forms. The central characters are not necessarily the artists, or their work, but those surrounding or attendant to them. The effect of love, either its reality or its lack, is paramount, even that between parent and child. A masterwork.

In 2018 Rachel Cusk famously noted “I don’t think character exists anymore.” In Parade, she explores the multitudes of identity and myriad forms artists take in their lives and in the world. In a painfully short, dizzyingly beautiful episodic novel, Cusk again and again proves to be a master of her craft and a truly singular voice in contemporary fiction, A stunning achievement.

It’s hard to claim that Parade is a novel. It’s part essay, part novel, part semi-autobiography (she draws from some real life experiences) and thoroughly non-conventional and experimental. The one thing I can say about the book is that it is not one to be lightly approached and is probably not very accessible to the average reader. For anyone who has read her previous works, you already know what you’re getting into when you purchase one of her books. For those new to the author, this is not the sort of book you pick up for a casual, plot-driven easy read.

The book is hard to adequately capture in a brief book review. The themes are various and rather complicated. This is a book about art (in various forms) and creation, identity and motherhood, truth and reality, and gender and the female artistic experience.

Parade is broken into 4 chapters or sections. Sections 1, 2, and 4 are told with alternating narratives. Chapter 3 is a single narrative and seemingly stand alone story about a dinner party where the various parties discuss art, gender, and the condition of the female artist. For me, chapters 1 and 4 contain large chunks that read more like a blend of philosophical musings, art history, and feminist essays than a traditional novel. They require that you pay attention and I mean PAY ATTENTION. I learned (after the fact) that the first section was based on a lecture she gave and a version was subsequently published as a standalone New Yorker piece..

Each section is connected to others in theme or content but the narrators and artists at the center of the narratives are different despite almost all of them being given the name of “G”. The reader is never quite sure who is “G” although those who have done their research have been quick to make links to real artists. Art in all its forms are tackled. I had to do significant research to learn about the inspirations behind several of these “G”s. Section one includes the stories of a male painter (of course named G) who others have identified at George Baselitz and a female sculptor (also named G) who draws inspiration from Loiuse Bourgeois (see the video below about her work to get a flavor why why Cusk uses her as one of the many inspirations for this novel).

The final section was published as a piece in Harper’s Magazine and thus returns to a format similar to the first section – blend of essay and fictionalized accounts.

Admittedly, I have the attentional capacity of a squirrel and these sorts of experimental books are often challenging for me. I read the first section full of rage at the author for making me work so hard. I then re-evaluated my approach to the book and slowed down my pace and added research to my reading — I looked up the artists referenced, I watched videos of their lives and works and I paused after each section to reflect on what I had read. And there are so many gems in this book. Cusk is clearly a brilliantly intelligent writer and she is challenging to read (I do actually have an advanced degree, just not in literature or art).

Once I had changed my approach to this book (and I should have learned by now since I’ve read her other work and had similar reactions), I felt greatly impacted. Some of her reflections on motherhood and the links between motherhood, creation, and identity were fascinating and will likely stay with me for some time. The day before I had finished the novel I had gone to lunch with a friend and we discussed the decision to have children (she decided not have children and I have a daughter). So I related to Cusk’s reflections on motherhood and the complexity of feelings related to motherhood (both being a mother and having a mother), self and professional identify, in a way that felt very personal.

So, ultimately it’s hard to review this book. I think it’s fascinating, beautifully written, and dazzlingly brilliant, but it’s also not very accessible to the average reader. The sorts of readers who will enjoy this novel are those who like experimental work, those who are have the time and intellectual interest in art, feminism, psychology of art, motherhood, and philosophy. I loved it but I also had moments of hatred and resentment because she put me through the wringer trying to understand the book and I left it feeling like I understood about 25% of what she was trying to convey. If you like Rachel Cusk, you will love this book. If you are looking for a fast-paced, plot driving novel, you will hate it. If you are a novice to the art world, you will likely need to do some research to fully benefit from reading this.

i do love a bit of Rachel Cusk. Cusk at her best is when you're a fly on the wall, listening to conversations and honestly, realising people suck. they do bad things, or at least don't care about others, or maybe its someone needing to vent and figure themselves out. you often get both sides in her stories.

i liked majority of Parade, the parts I felt smart enough to understand. slowing down ad rereading sections still didn't help my noggin comprehend her questions and thoughts, but i may have been a tired reader during this short novel..

I'm looking forward to the interviews and articles on this one. Cusk makes me so curious!

I've been wanting to read Rachel Cusk for a long time. Other than an ill-advised attempt at listening to her work on audio (her prose is much better suited to the page), this is my first time opening one of her books.

She's a beautiful writer, but for me it's the case of the parts being greater than the whole. It just felt like the whole thing never coalesced.

Fascinating, compelling, elliptical, elusive, interrogating art, relationships, motherhood, the lasting effects of twisted mothering, love and violence, the dominance of men in relationships, gender, identity, bodies, racism, stereotypes, life and death. Both wild and tamped down, via the cool intellectual prose, the switching between third person and first, the several different artists (a white male painter, a Black male painter, a female painter/multimedia artist, and a filmmaker) each only referred to as G, the interpretation of their singular works, the interpolation of other stories - a couple who have left their country and are trying to find a place to live, the story of a twisted mother and the terrible legacy of distance that inhabits her grown children, the death of a man in a museum, the punching of a woman by another woman in the street - I can't say I fully understand everything set out in this book, and likely it is a novel that needs to be read more than once to grasp what might have eluded the reader the first time around, but all of it stays in the mind. A brainy book that straddles fiction and dissertation but never leaves people behind.

Thanks to Farrar, Straus & Giroux and Netgalley for the ARC.

This continues with the same European liminal style as her outline trilogy-but has a more narrow interrogative focus-looking at what it means to be an artist and a parent (mother) and the conflicts inherent in it. It is a novel not without frustrations-all the artists, regardless of gender are referred to as 'G' and one is frequently unsure as to which cities are being described and there is a real sense of being unanchored. But there are many delights to be found- the conversations that characters have at dinner in the aftermath of a tragedy and the bracing intelligence of the narration ask hard questions of the reader. I found the final section really interesting as it gave the illusion of being the most personal refection on childhood, possibly posing the question of what kind of childhood creates an artist, and it almost felt like the novel has been working up to this sense of revelation the whole time. In some ways it is less a 'novel' than a series of connected vignettes-but no less interesting for that. Definitely for fans of Cusk's earlier works and in a similar vein to Deborah Levy's work.

I’ll admit this book just probably wasn’t my style from the get go, so if it is your style do not let my rating dissuade you.

Parade is a very interesting book that one can’t really refer to as a conventional narrative. This book was highly experimental in its writing and exceedingly melancholy. Whilst the writing was certainly a distinctly beautiful brand of pretentiousness, as someone who has yet to read a purely philosophical novel, going into this I did struggle with maintaining my full attention when reading. That said this is the type of book that I may be prevailed upon to try again in the future, as the notion of the interconnectedness of people and the exploration of art were compelling, and the nameless natures of the characters made them feel oddly intimate as if in stripping them of identity, it became easier to identify them.

A unique read, that goes beyond the usually maintained borders of fiction, this book contained great prose and philosophical quandaries, however for a mostly narrative driven reader such as myself, it was at times difficult to immerse in.

Cusk's latest work is truly remarkable! It's a profound exploration that delves into complex themes with such depth and breadth that attempting to summarize it feels nearly impossible. Yet, far from being a flaw, this density and intensity speak to the richness of the narrative. It tackles significant subjects like art, reality, identity, and gender with remarkable fluidity.

Critics have discussed its form and structure, which provide coherence amidst the profound inquiries within. The narrative employs recurring imagery and motifs, such as mirrors and reflections, to underscore themes of self-division and unity. The evolution from 'I' to 'we' mirrors this exploration of self and gender, offering a thought-provoking journey.

Moreover, Cusk challenges traditional novel conventions by questioning the role of the narrator and experimenting with form. Incorporating elements from her own essays on art and feminism, she blurs the lines between fiction and non-fiction, offering a critical examination of societal norms and emotional commodification.

The book's wide array of intertexts invites readers to bring their own perspectives, adding layers of interpretation. Of particular note is the exploration of shame, echoing themes found in the works of Annie Ernaux.

This is not a book to be taken lightly—it demands careful attention. However, for me, it represents Cusk's finest work yet, building upon her previous achievements with newfound clarity and purpose. It's an exciting glimpse into her evolving literary journey.

Special thanks to Farrar, Straus and Giroux for providing an advance copy via NetGalley.

Obviously, Rachel Cusk is smarter and more sophisticated than I am, and despite the fact that I am always struck by how wonderfully constructed her sentences are, I’ve only ever given one of her novels (Second Place) more than three stars: the wonderful sentences stack up and up into something that whooshes right over my head. Because Parade is primarily about art and artists, I’ll use the analogy that I much prefer Impressionism to Realism (in both painting and literature), and while I might appreciate elements of Abstract art on an intellectual level, it doesn’t speak to my soul; and what Cusk is doing in her work to “disturb and define the novel” strikes me as closest to the Abstract. This novel that reads like a series of essays or vignettes — a shifting parade of artists, all named “G” — repeats themes of doubling and mirroring, death and violence, having children and losing parents, and it all seems to add up to a commentary on gender and artmaking — and I say “seems” because coming right out with a point seems to be beside the point (which is not a fatal flaw, just hard for me to connect with). As an intellectual exercise, I am enlarged for having picked this up, but when it comes down to taste, this isn’t exactly my thing.

I wish I like the new Cusk more than I did, as art, artists and all the social topics mentioned in the blurb are right up my alley. And its a Cusk!

I felt really detached by the two story strands in each of the short stories (Yes, it is hard for me to see this as a novel), which always involve one (or multiple) artists just called G. G hence is multiple people, making it hard to connect and care.

I think that this book should be read as an experiment following the outline trilogy. But other than the outline trilogy, the story strands don't contour a main character and feel running nowhere.

I am still happy that I read the book, as it shows how Cusk is trying to evolve her style, but to me this stays an experiments, which has not fully succeeded.

Thank you netgalley and Faber for providing me with an advanced reading copy.

Like most novels from Rachel Cusk, it is hard to say exactly what this one is “about”, per se. It is certainly interested in the ways in which seemingly opposing forces - anger and compassion, independence and motherhood, life and death, the past and the present - wrestle with one another. And, while it ostensibly tells several relatively simple stories - an artist suddenly decides to start painting upside down; a woman is randomly attacked while walking down the street in Paris; a family comes to terms with their mother’s death - its narrative is not linear or clear-cut.

Cusk blends art criticism with autofiction, reeling between different points of view, and as a result I found it difficult at first to get into (one of more confusing elements is that lots of the protagonists are referred to by the same initial, "G") but around half-way something seemed to click. Once I began to abandon trying to work out exactly what was going on, and instead just focused on the sorts of ideas and arguments it was attempting to express, a sense of real satisfaction began to emerge: I started to notice common threads connecting each section together, and could piece together the overarching, yet still ambiguous, interests of the text.

Thank you to Farrar, Straus and Giroux and NetGalley for my free e-ARC!

Unsure if Cusk’s writing style has gone completely over my head, or if it simply just isn’t for me! This was my first Cusk and I’ve heard Outline is much more accessible, and might think about picking that up as I’m curious about her work.

Thanks to Netgalley and FSG for the ebook. In this book we’re introduced to an artist being identified as G. Or are we being introduced to several artists named G, both male and female? Or is it a single artist who has lived many lives? Always fascinating tales about an artist and the people they surround themselves with.

3 "the banality of affluent suburban feminism" stars !!

Thank you to the author, Netalley, and Farrar, Strauss & Giroux for providing me with an ecopy. I am providing an honest review. This will be released June 2024.

Vignette

J, a fervent Cuskophile and aspiring Cuskologist is feeling elated. Underneath HIS arm is the beloved Outline trilogy as well as the devilish Second Place. He is to meet R at a Viennese cafe for a discussion, a deep and fervent discussion. HE is wearing his favorite lavender scarf and as he enters the cafe he is assaulted by the most heavely scents. Anxiously, he looks around and the bakery is full. Goodness gracious ! There is a painter, a writer, a poet, a sculptor, a film director and a few of each. Mostly white affluent women by their attire and a couple of goateed men that sort of look like women. They look forlorn, ever suffering, put upon. Pouting and grimacing and leering. The waitress comes across to greet me. Are you the doodler G ? You are expected. She loves my lavendar scarf. No no I am J ! The Cuskophile. She grimaces. There are no tables here for you...all are taken by G. The Gs stare. I am meeting R. She points to a small wobbly table. The Gs gasp and grimace. I notice the nametag of the waitress is also G. Phd in aesthestics studying the put upon genius of G.... aaaa i say.
The G next to me states where is Parade ? I don't wish to discuss Parade. A collective gasp. May I have some opera cake. The Gs have all ordered it. Pavlova please....eaten by the Gs. But but....The waitress G sneers....the desserts are for the put upon , oppressed Gs...not for the likes of you. The likes of me? Why yes....but wait you look off white, olive perhaps, and definitely queer, perhaps working class ? If you are nonbinary perhaps I can find you a croissant. Ummm no I am cismale but I would love the croissant. Harrumph say all the Gs even the goateed ones. A spot of tea only...just a spot and out you go....

Sparkling and intelligent prose reveal dated and currently irrelevant manufactured neurosis. Ummm my least favorite R and I hope she moves back to brilliance and effervescence.

The Gs look at me with their misplaced suspicion as I exit with my other beloved books.