One of my absolute favourite series in existence that I have re-read multiple times. I'm eagerly awaiting book four!

I listened to the audiobook version. A lot going on in this novel and that's a good thing. Story jumps back and forth between the past and the present. One reveal had me speechless. I’m sure everyone has this third part of Scott Lynch’s great series starting Locke Lamora and his cast of supporting characters. Highly recommended.

I am sorry I was unable to read this book within the timescales of it being published, thank you for the opportunity, should I read it in the future I will review it online

This is the perfect book for someone who wants to read a seven hundred page long novel but has the attention span of a goldfish. Some chapters are 2 pages long or less, and some sections are a handful of pages. It's pretty distracting. I guess I'd appreciate it if I wanted to read this book while waiting in line at the grocery store or while I'm waiting for a red light to turn green (something I don't really recommend doing).

Anyway, the book is fine. Wish I had read the first two of the series first tho.

If you are like me, you’ve read Scott Lynch’s first two novels several times while eagerly awaiting his THE REPUBLIC OF THIEVES. There have been very few novels that I, personally, had anticipated as much as this one. I guess the real question is whether or not the wait was worth it?
For me, yes. I’m a patient sort for the most part. There are so many amazing novels to read that waiting doesn’t bother me as much as it used to. That, combined with the knowledge that Lynch was facing some pretty severe personal issues, made me not care too much at the oft delayed 3rd novel in the Gentlemen Bastard Sequence. It’s been five years since RED SEAS UNDER RED SKIES, but now that the novel is here, I find I hardly care about that wait.
Here is my one and only warning. If you haven’t read both THE LIES OF LOCKE LAMORA (EBR Review) and RED SEAS UNDER RED SKIES (Amazon), don’t read this review. I can’t help but spoil a few things from those terrific novels here. That’s it. You’ve been warned.
THE REPUBLIC OF THIEVES is a very different novel from the previous two. It picks up pretty much right where RED SEAS UNDER RED SKIES leaves off with Locke being poisoned. He has very little time to live, and Jean is doing his best to find a way to cure his friend. This leave Locke ripe for the manipulating, which the Bondsmagi of Karthain promptly do. They want Locke and Jean to rig an election for a certain political party in Karthain. Their opponent is none other than Sabetha, Locke’s ex-lover whom he still loves.
What is promised here is a story of politics, manipulation and corruption on a massive scale. I was definitely intrigued. Except we really don’t get much of this.
THE REPUBLIC OF THIEVES really isn’t about manipulating an election (though some of that comes into play). This is the Locke and Sabetha story. They story of how they met. How their relationship grew. How they finally became lovers. How they react to each other after not seeing each other for five years. Buried under everything, this is a love story and a tragedy. If you can’t accept that, this novel will be a disappointment to you. I figured out this piece rather quickly, so I was able to enjoy the novel for what it was, and enjoy it I did. Immensely.
The questions that have always plagued me since first reading THE LIES OF LOCKE LAMORA centered over who Locke really was, and who Sabetha really was. They have always been more than just normal people, and I wanted some answers to those questions. They way this is all told is through a series of flashbacks (as usual in a Scott Lynch novel) to the time before Sabetha left the Gentlemen Bastards, and then the current political events in Karthain. The flashbacks cover a time when the whole of the Gentlemen Bastards are packed off by Father Chains to learn stagecraft. As usual, it all goes wrong.
The previous novels in this series have all had some grand scheme that Locke and Jean were trying to execute. THE REPUBLIC OF THIEVES is a bit different in this regard. The big scheme is actually fairly limited to the flashbacks, and the political machinations devolve mostly into elaborate pranks (with the exception of a beautifully maneuvered finale). As such, the tone of the novel feels more like the main characters are just reacting to events rather than proactively setting and enacting large-scale schemes.
I don’t want you to think I didn’t like the novel. I did. In the end I loved it. It was paced far better, and was infinitely more cohesive than RED SEAS UNDER RED SKIES. It just didn’t go into the politics as much as I would have liked, and the characters were less active than in prior novels.
That said, I have come to the conclusion that Lynch is one of the most engaging wordsmiths in the business. His writing is captivating. I loved just reading the words, and the way he structures his chapters. It is extremely hard to pull of meaningful flashbacks in a novel, and this novel is half flashback–indeed I would say the flashback story is of far more importance than the current story.
The other thing I love is how consistent the characters are from book to book. This isn’t to say they are stagnant, because they do learn. The Locke Lamora from THE LIES OF LOCKE LAMORA is a radically different character from the one he is in the REPUBLIC OF THIEVES. It’s the logical reactions that Jean, Locke and Sabetha have that make them real. It’s how their progression is consistent and, again, logical. They are never out of character, and that takes tremendous skill as an author.
I should also mention that within the flashbacks Lynch even created an original play. The play–titled The Republic of Thieves, of course–obviously is a window into the Gentlemen Bastards, and into the Locke/Sabetha relationship. It’s awesome, but you can see how everything in the novel is focused on those two.
So what does this novel accomplish for the series? It’s a question I asked myself frequently after finishing the book. In reality, it’s pure setup. It sets up a super-villain of sorts. It sets up Locke and Sabetha with very real context. It moves Locke and Jean from the mess and tragedy at the end of RES SEAS UNDER RED SKIES into the next phase of the series. It gives us teases as to how bad things are going to get for Locke. In some ways the novel accomplishes little, while in other ways it accomplishes a ton.
Whether or not you will like the book will depend–wait for it–entirely on you. I loved it. The novel is a far more personal novel, and I really appreciated that tone. There aren’t many novels out there that can compete with THE REPUBLIC OF THIEVES.

As I begin this third book in the Thorn of Camorr series, I am tamping the lid down on a stomach full of excitement and butterflies. This is a Locke Lamora book - the LATEST ONE! - and one where we finally get to meet the girl who brought him to his knees.

I have high expectations. From the previous books, I know The Republic of Thieves will have lyrical prose, high adventure and fast-paced action. We left the last book on a cliffhanger; Locke is slowly and painfully dying, his best friend's life saved at the cost of his own. They are broke and in a new city with no resources and a ticking clock on the length of their lives.

I wonder if they are setting us up for deaths - Jean, Locke's. "No one wins all the time", the author tells us early on.

I'm sorry to say that this third installment did not live up to the promise of the first two. It's one of those situations that happens to any great author - George R R Martin had a stutter in his series, Robert Jordan had sucky mid-series books in spades (think books 8, 9 and 10 of the Wheel of Time). I may have had lofty expectations to begin with! But this book really threw me for a loop - I took nearly 6 months to finish this review because I DID NOT WANT TO WRITE a bad review of this wonderful series.

The first 100 pages is great, wonderfully paced, and starts right where the last book ended. And then it starts to meander, and you wonder where the author is going with this. Sadly, the plotlines get sillier, and Sabetha's story doesn't revive it any. The plotlines are over two different times - you have Sabetha and Locke while they were thieves together in Camorr, and then now, when Locke is dying and Sabetha is just self-absorbed and touchy.
I missed the scheming action and the -rug-pulled-from-your-feet fast jobs they pull in each book! Where did it go?

The prophecy at the end sets up nicely for the next book The Thorn of Emberlain -

Three things must you take up and three things must you lose before you die: a key, a crown, a child. You will die when a silver rain falls.

I don't like how characters who are dead by book 3 have come back to life now because this book goes frequently into the past. I hated the looooong portion where Jean goes into Patience's memories. I didn't like how we know Locke is in love with Sabetha, we learn this in books 1 and 2, but we don't actually meet her until this book. Locke is the "thorn of Camorr" in book 1 but we don't find out why until book 3. Everything is out of order and it's frustrating! Plus this book was pretty boring. A divided political election...gah what a year to choose to read this! I read to escape reality. Haha. This book is half election and half theater but all Locke/Sabetha.

My apologies - if I requested this, it looks like I never had the chance to download it prior to the expiration of the time limit. Thanks for the opportunity.