Uncut is an extremely in-depth read about the foreskin, mainly in America. The author is a very bright academic, and that was really the biggest issue in this book. There were a lot of incredibly interesting analyses made along the way that would sometimes come off as too dense for an average reader. The way this book is presented (by the cover, at least) this book may attract a reader that is looking for something less in depth than this one. The author worked tirelessly to avoid focusing on circumcision and instead focus on the foreskin itself, but this is a somewhat futile endeavor. People only care about the foreskin because of its tendency to be snipped. I think the author's academic-like prose made this book feel longer than it needed to be. I learned a lot, and I will carry a lot from this book going forward, but I don't know that I would necessarily recommend it to others.

Than you to Netgalley and University of Regina Press for an ARC in exchange for an honest review.

Thank you to Net Galley for sending me an ARC of this book in exchange for an honest review. I requested this book because it the cover and title made it seem more humorous and accessible than it actually is. This book is pretty much a textbook on the foreskin in Anglo-American culture. It's interesting because the author frequently talks about discussion of the foreskin and circumcisions are largely intertwined, and how most cannot discuss the foreskin without discussing circumcision. Still, the book's very title references circumcision. I thought this was going to be a fun, sexual health, that can be accessible for most audiences. It's not, it's a very academic book (althougha the author's writing is less dense than some academic texts, I will give them that). I just was not interested in that, and I feel it should be advertised as such.

First book I have read on the subject matter. Very insightful and I like the way it was presented. I enjoyed the read. Thanks to NetGalley, the author and the publisher for the arc of this book in return for my thoughts. Receiving the book in this manner had no bearing on my thoughts.

This book was a riveting exploration of something I never really took the time to think a whole lot about. I found the historical lessons elucidating and erudite, but the book still feels approachable and entertaining for a reader who doesn't have a background in history or biology. I look forward to buying a physical copy of this book as soon as possible.

Thank you to Jonathan A Allan, University of Regina Press, and Netgalley for the ARC in exchange for my honest review.

This book offers a thought-provoking exploration of the cultural, medical, and social significance of the foreskin. With an interdisciplinary approach, Allan examines how this small part of the body has been debated, misunderstood, and portrayed throughout history. A fascinating and eye-opening read that challenges perceptions and raises important questions.

An accessible and deeply scholarly, well-researched, discussed and presented book about uncut gems, I mean, uncut penises.
Noo - sorry, that is kind of lacking in content and context: many aspects of circumcision are covered in this book and Allan’s prose is engaging.
I’ll cut here. I wonder if the author ever giggled after studying the subject matter for so long and writing about it.

Jokes aside, this is a comprehensive and up-to-date title on the subject matter, and I highly recommend it to those who are interested in knowing more about sociological, physical and psychological aspects related to circumcision or the lack of the practice of it.

This definitely seemed like it would be a more approachable book around men's studies on the topic of foreskin, however, it was surprisingly in depth and formal, which was very educational. Allan discusses cultural and medical reasons why people tend to get circumcised and also disproves any "superstitions." If you are interested in men's studies, men's health, or just curious about the historic relevance of circumcision, this book is for you.

Thank you to Net Galley for sending me an ARC of this book in exchange for an honest review.

I requested this book because it the cover and title made it seem more humorous and accessible than it actually is. This book is pretty much a textbook on the foreskin in Anglo-American culture. It's interesting because the author frequently talks about discussion of the foreskin and circumcisions are largely intertwined, and it almost seems like you cannot discuss the foreskin without discussing circumcision. Still, the book's very title references circumcision.

I thought this was going to be a fun, sexual health, that can be accessible for most audiences. It's not, it's a very academic book (although the author's writing is less dense than some academic texts, I will give them that). I just was not interested in that, and I feel it should be advertised as such.

Thoroughly enjoyed this book. The topic is of course, unorthodox, but that's the charm.
I would definitely invite the author on my podcast.

Uncut was an interesting book to read, a middle child of sorts to Mary Roach’s Boink and Rachel’s Gross’ Vagina Obscura. Allan was able to hold the line of academic voice with subtle humor but truly allowed his research to make the humor for him. The book was incredibly full of information from scholarly, religious, medical, and even pop-cultural sources. I appreciated the frankness with which he wrote, merely laying out all of the cards and allowing the reader to decide on what to think. He did a fantastic job at pointing out the biases against “intact” members in popular books, movies, and shows and also highlight the religious and historical connections. His chapter on pregnancy books was particularly powerful, highlighting the information found in what should be objective sources to be more biased than one would think, and made interesting arguments about the very language we use to describe uncircumcised penises. All in all, a rather fun read, though more informative and scholarly. Mary Roach will always be the best in this field, as her books are laugh out loud funny and scholarly, but Allan is a close second, threading that needle of academic and dry in a way that made reading about penises more enjoyable than I’d like to admit,

I appreciated the thorough discussion of both sides of various arguments made throughout the book. The writing was easily digestible for a nonfiction/academic read. Thank you netgalley for the free copy to read and review.

This is a really interesting academic book, but readers should be aware, this is not popsci and maybe not the best book for somebody who wants some quick info on the foreskin or even guidance on if or if not you should opt against circumcision. It‘s scientifically sound and Allan‘s interdisciplinary excursions are interesting to read. Everybody comes into this book with some preconceived notions or ideas about the foreskin and Allan makes us aware of them. That was maybe the most interesting part to me – When I went „Oh my God yes, now I get this!“ over certain societal norms. E.G. how circumcision ties in with American patriotism and fear of the naked body.
I recommend this to everybody with a serious interest in this underappreciated organ, but do not even try reading this tired before going to bed.

I picked up another book recently on the subject of circumcision, which, first of all, I DNF-ed because it was poorly written, and two, it was focused on intactivism as opposed to an overview of the subject and issues. In comparison, Allan’s book gave me exactly what I was looking for in trying to understand this subject better and more thoroughly. Although this is an academic text, I found the text to still be fairly accessible, and Allan’s writing is concise while still retaining thoroughness and nuance.

I could feel Allan’s struggle to keep his focus on the foreskin (the precise subject of his book) while the specter of circumcision lurks behind every sentence. The foreskin is only interesting to us because of its disappearing act, so to speak. Thus trying to talk about something that is interesting for its lack of presence is hard to do without discussing the process that eliminates it from view. But I found myself persuaded by Allan’s argumentation and evidence presentation, even when I was resistant to his points (a resistance I will fully admit was due to my own pre- and misconceptions).

Allan’s stated goal is to write an archive of the foreskin, tracing the foreskin through many different media for different audiences to explore all the different ways people engage with the foreskin and why. What are the stakes and anxieties of the discussions of the foreskin, and how are those played out in AMAB individuals’ bodies? He examined parenting manuals, sex manuals, intactivist literature, and classical and contemporary art, among others, to facilitate this discussion. Even though he covers such a broad range of topics, Allan is always careful to explicitly state that his arguments should under no circumstances be taken as antisemitic, Islamaphobic, or otherwise disparaging of religious practices or even cultural practices. He is not “taking a side” on the issue of circumcision; his goal is to present some of the main ways the foreskin has been discussed in North American contemporary media (he’s Canadian, but American cultural mores heavily influence Canada, so realistically he primarily analyzed works from the US).

I have never been very interested in men’s and masculinity studies (I have a degree in women’s studies, after all), but I do think the field is important to show how patriarchy and compulsory heterosexuality impact men in negative and potentially traumatic ways. The reach of feminism has been expanding to an anti-patriarchy movement, critiquing all of the ways that patriarchal systems and structures hurt everyone, including the white cismen the system privileges. This is not to make the argument men are suffering from their male privilege to a greater degree than women are suffering under patriarchal oppression but to note that the system as a whole is damaging to mental and physical health. The manosphere and men’s rights activist groups have really done a disservice to men in co-opting useful terms and hiding serious issues under misogynistic garbage to the point where actual problems men are facing in our current culture are difficult to discuss without sounding misogynistic at points. I found my hackles rising at some points in Allan’s book because of my previous experiences with people talking about some of the issues in his book; they are usually presented in the context of men trying to argument that the world actually operates on “female privilege” and men are the truly disadvantaged ones in our society.

I hope that men reading this book or men contemplating these issues and their relationship to their circumcision status can develop a level of empathy for women who have medical procedures denied them or forced upon them because of their gender or who have had their stories of trauma dismissed because of their gender. All things which were discussed in testimonies from men within this book. I hope that, ultimately, this book can be used to bring men and women together to understand the problem is the patriarchal hegemony we live under that forces us from birth to conform to certain standards for gender that are also impossible to perfectly attain.

For men around the world, circumcision is a sensitive issue. Is it only a religious marker, an aesthetic choice, or a medical necessity? The questions remain open, and Allan gives a quick, but thorough introduction to the foreskin frenzy. He refers to his book as an "intervention", standing in the middle of a longstanding debate over a couple inches of loose flesh. It strikes me more as a mediating attempt than an intervention, however. Allan covers both sides; why do some people cut their pink turtlenecks off, while others leave it intact? He goes over the history of the procedure, starting from time immemorial, and moving through to modernity. Never falling on either side of the skin scissors, Allan is content to present an overview and critique each side when due. Does the foreskin really protect you from AIDS? (Spoiler: no) Is an uncircumcised penis more sensitive? (Spoiler: Maybe?) The final effort provides a snapshot of modern sentiments, scientific research and suggestions on moving forward. If you needed a sex manual encyclopedia covering the foreskin, this could be your start! Allan, admittedly, doesn't present any conclusions; his book is an analysis, as the subtitle suggests. He does occasionally let this guise slip, but he gives both sides their fair shake.
To the writing -- Allan is clearly an academic, and I think the book could have worked better if he removed the academic jargon. By this, I mean the academic tradition of taking multiple pages to tell your reader about your research practices, sources, and biases. Not a bad habit, but it interferes with the reading of a book meant to be popular science. Allen occasionally let's his academic guard down and realizes the comedic joy that can be had in his subject, such as, "...the foreskin finds itself between a rock and a hard place." His first chapter, as well, displays his writing chops. If you can get over Allan's constant reminders that he is an academic, this book is a terrific introduction to the matter of circumcision. Does it contribute to the future of foreskin, as Allan seems to want? Only time will tell, but I am sceptical. In order to contribute to his future, this work would have had to be more than a review, making actual claims. The one area it did this was in suggesting more work should be done on sensitivity. So perhaps.
My thanks to NetGalley, the publisher, and the author for the free ARC.

I have to be honest and say that as a cisgendered woman I have not thought much about the foreskin. This book changed that and opened my eyes to a fascinating debate! It covers the history of circumcision as well as discussing current cultural thoughts and trends in an accessible, inclusive, and exciting way. It is incredibly well researched and informative.

As a US mom to two intact boys, this was a great read! I learned some additional information that I didn't previously know. I hope more parents will give thought to this heinous procedure before subjecting their innocent baby to it. Thank you for shedding light on the topic!