This was the kind of book and the way I enjoy edutainment, or public science. The book was full of fun and interesting pictures, behind the screens stories. The overlapping of the stories of various scientist careers and the changes in theory is interesting to see.

This is a fun, challenging, dense collection of essays for the reader who wants to know more about the science behind how living things have changed. The essays do have some academic tones, so I wouldn't recommend it to a younger reader interested in paleontology and evolutionary biology. If you don't want to spend the money on the college courses, but want the knowledge, this is a good addition to your library.

I thought this book was really interesting. It was a collection of essays all focused on different topics within macro evolutionary and natural history. I found myself a little lost in some of the writing, with technical vocabulary that I had no idea on the meanings of, however some had very helpful diagrams and images to help understand; I really appreciated that! The book was definitely a good read, I just think at this moment in time personally, it was too technical for me! Maybe with a reread in a few years I would understand more!

I'm fascinated by paleontology and this was an informative and engrossing read that made me learn so much.
Great read, highly recommended
Many thanks to the publisher for this ARC, all opinions are mine

this was so informative and easy to understand. I struggle to understand complex words and practices but this was amazing.

This book started out as a science book but quickly devolved into nonsense. I don’t even know what this book is supposed to be.

Thanks, NetGalley, for the ARC.

This was a fun read, and very informative without being too complicated to understand. I loved the biographical parts just as much as the educational parts.

Part essay, part biography, a nerdy but fun read. Lots of academic drama and details, this book won't be for everybody but no book is.

By the time I got back to reading this book, I had momentarily forgotten that this is more of a collection of essays, with the deliberate structure of a book that has a thesis at its core.

Upon completion, I am glad this was written the way it was. Science meeting storytelling - paleontology has a lot in common with journalism and sociology. The range of topics covered was ideal, and the incorporation of various topics such as valves. naps, D’Artagnan made this all the more engaging for me.

As a long-time fan of the books by paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould, I was delighted to read this book by his fellow scientists. It covers the advancements in the field in significant depth since Gould's death, to be certain, but it is also a riveting example of how science works and changes over time. Researchers argue over, change or discard ideas—and this is critical—when new evidence shows up, and only then (not on a whim or solely to prop up an orthodoxy).

Very highly recommended.

Macroevolutionaries is a book of essays on topics in macroevolution. It is not a survey but focused on the work of the authors, or more specifically the theories that, along with Steven J. Gould and Elisabeth Vrba, they authored or supported. In particular, this is Gould and Eldredge's Punctuated Equilibrium hypothesis, (or "punk eek" in the book, customarily, establishing once and for all that not all words ought to be written down), which interprets the evolutionary process as one that alternates between periods of stability and periods of change, and Vrba's turnover-pulse hypothesis, which is sort of like Punctuated Equilibrium but on an ecological instead of species level.

Gould comes up frequently. Outside of his research and teaching, he wrote a column for Natural History magazine, and wrote popular science books on top of that. Gould wrote in a digressionary style that made use of non-scientific topics or analogies, or looked at the way that science was digested by the public. He had a legendary feud with Richard Dawkins on scientific grounds that mirrored small-p political divisions between them (i.e. calling one right and the other left would be wrong, but the rift had philosophical elements that pair up with other differences between them).

The writing styles itself in the manner of Gould's writing (though Eldredge has enough of his own career that I do not mean to damn with faint praise there). In the best essays in the collection, such as "Expanding Evolution," or "Of Cultural Nationalism, Hamlet and the Cloaca Universalis" the book lands a triple by providing an interesting new topic, in manner that reads like Gould, and provides light on Gould's own life.

Something that I personally liked was how the book makes a point of not going along with the conventional wisdom or popular perception of scientists, particularly Lamarck, (which I also know is the topic of more extensive books by one of the authors) but also Cuvier and Lyle. There is interesting speculation about what historical figures would have thought about different developments, and "Asleep at the Switch" and the notion of the importance of observing null results was interesting to juxtapose with having just read The Ultimate Hidden Truth of the World] and his theory about non-radiation of culture.

The collection is in need of a stronger editorial hand. There is times where it feels in competition with Gould, and having learned the wrong sorts of lessons. Reading Gould in compilation can make it look like he was a more discursive writer than he was. He usually was not so broad within the context of a particular essay as the essays here are, or included as many puns. He just knew how to tie horse evolution to Nick and Nora Charles. In this book, the lily is gilded, to the point of obscuring meaning. At some points, a section only makes sense in hindsight, in the context of a later section out of a different essay.

The strangest thing about the book is Vrba, who gets invoked often but in a manner that suggests that she either quit science to code or died. As far as I know, she retired in 2014 and is still talking with the authors.

Something that works in its favor is that it ends strongly. And with the weaker chapters, there is always that One Good Idea in them, choked by weeds. And I confess that my expectations were high for this, in a way that I feel conflicted about any rating.

My thanks to the authors, Bruce Lieberman and Niles Eldredge, for writing the book, and to the publisher, Columbia University Press, for making the ARC available to me.

Thank you to NetGalley, the publisher, and the author for an early access copy in exchange for an honest review.

Part science, part exploration of human culture, and part trip down memory lane, Macroevolutionaries was simultaneously entertaining, educational, and funny. It's composed of a bunch of different essays, and each is full of heart and character. Occasionally there will be a diagram or photo to explain or give a little bit more relevant context, which I VERY much appreciated. I had a really good afternoon with this book and will probably read it again sometime in the next year or two. I'll never look at a Three Musketeers the same way.

The book was super informative! I learned so much from it that was easy to understand without sacrificing knowledge.
I will definitely be picking it up in a physical copy.