This book explains in an easy to follow way, the benefits of a walkable city, much like Paris or any other European city. The walkable city would, at first, be looked at oddly by an American audience, but then, would be embraced for the ease of living and the "I never asked for this" component of unintended exercise.

I couldn't put this little book down. Whittle does a great job explaining the 15 minute city, its history, and possible problems that this urban planning schema presents. Take it one chapter at a time or devour it in one read like I did. Shrink the City is a nonfiction book that takes you on a tour of the future.

I received a free ARC from NetGalley, and this review is voluntary

The literature discusses the theory of the 15-minute city, or an urban landscape developed to be tighter, and more connected. More pathways for walking, and cycling as a means of transpiration. Introducing greener buildings, or a more equitable environmental. Pushing for interconnectivity to allow for overall accessibility.

Some takeaways:

In the pre-face, there is mention of redlining in Zoning, which is a discriminatory practice in housing policy; however, it's not touched upon enough in the rest of the literature, vis-a-vis the impact of the policy itself on homeownership for African-Americans, at least as it relates to the history of real estate in the United States. What it means to be born in the wrong Zipcode.

I found the first chapter to be chalk full of information, but with the way it's presented it does ramble a bit. Swinging back and forth between past and present, to provide examples to highlight the idea currently being discussed, per the view of the 15-minute city.

The rest of the chapters are written from the perspective of what has worked in other areas. Provided to the reader as less of a comparative analysis, but how it could work, because of what's already worked elsewhere. Overall, it's not a bad read. The concept of the 15-minute city is an interesting one for urban planning. When it comes to how things are for us on the American side, I'm not sure how the theory would manifest if there was enough space for it. What I do think, though, is that pieces of the theory can be introduced within our existing framework. A slow, or gradual change from within. It won't be perfect, but until we start to tackle the root problems, and generate remedy for those problems, the status quo will remain.

A couple of things I think should have been mentioned:

The re-usage of existing buildings. A good chunk of the literature discussed work-from-home policy, or mentioned the pandemic, which inevitably led some businesses to shutter their doors, or change company policy so folks can work from home, which potentially leaves a building empty. There are complications both on the alteration and renovation side, as well as building codes, but for what can be re-used or re-purposed to meet the end goal of the 15-minute city should be included.

And lastly, unless I missed it, I don't believe accessibility for those with disabilities was mentioned, which ironically - accessibility, is the heart of the 15-minute city policy. Can't tell you how many older buildings I've walked into without an access ramp for those with wheelchairs, or a bathroom that doesn't provide handrails, or a turning radius in the bathroom for a wheel chair user. In order to have an ideal city that works for all, it must include all. That should be discussed a bit more as part of the actual thesis statement. Accessibility through inclusivity.

Otherwise, this was well-written and researched. Should probably take a second look to see if it could be organized a little better, but it was very informative.

A book about the 15 minute city experiment as it relates to our cities and how could it apply to cities of the future.

This wasn’t really structured in a way I thought it would be. It felt a bit rambling at times, and I wish it had done more of a case study for each chapter.