Y'all. WOW.

What can I say about this book [and the man] that hasn't been said before [and better than I could ever say]? I am still [days later] blown away by what I read. Wowsers.

John Lewis was an amazing man who overcame so much to do SO MUCH for so many - to heard the stories from those who knew and loved him was just so heartwarming and reminded me why I miss him and his fighting spirit so much right now [especially in times like we are currently experiencing].

Written and researched by someone who clearly liked and respected Mr. Lewis, this is a deep-dive into Mr. Lewis' life and his amazing work over the years. I learned things I never knew and my love and respect for this man just grew page by page. I so wish I had had the opportunity to meet him.

I know when I was finished [after having a good ugly cry], I was ready to 'fight' again and get in some "Good Trouble". As we all fight the fight for democracy, freedom, Civil Rights and everything else that is going to come at us, let us all remember the spirit of John Lewis and do him proud. Lets ALL get into some Good Trouble and get it done.

Thank you to NetGalley, David Greenberg, and Simon & Schuster for providing this ARC in exchange for an honest review.

I’ll admit I knew limited details about John Lewis’ life outside of him marching in Selma and being a Congressman. This book provides a detailed retelling of Lewis’ life, his passion for humanity and equality, and his strength in the face of adversity.

The book is intimidating with the length, but each chapter progressively captivated and reminded me of the parallels between Lewis’ fight 60 years ago and the fight today. There are scenes early in the book that are difficult to read because of heart-wrenching they are, but they are critical for understanding how extreme the fight was. I teared up reading those details, but I was crying as I read about Lewis’ fight against cancer and his death. Even though I knew didn’t survive I found myself wishing he would win, to help in today’s fight.

This is a great book for anyone who would like to read more about John Lewis, learn more about the civil rights movement, or learn more about recent US history.

I give the book 4.75 stars. I received a free ebook from Netgalley in exchange for a fair and unbiased review. I have really liked John Lewis from when I learned about him. However, I don't remember learning about him as a young person. I have always been fascinated by the civil rights movement.

I am a gen xer. I grew up learning about Martin Luther King. I remember thinking how indebted we should be to him. After reading this book, I feel John Lewis did so MUCH for this nation. I really believe everyone needs to be educated on John Lewis.

This was probably the longest book I have ever read. It took me about 3 weeks to read it. I always wanted to keep reading this book. This book is more than a book on John Lewis. This is a book on civil rights, politics, presidents, illness, perseverance, history, racism, current politics, and so much more.

This is the book to read if you want to learn more about Nixon, Reagan, Carter, Bush, Obama. Trump, Biden, Pelosi, Marin Luther King, Israel, Palestine, student protests, and so MUCH more.

The book has so MUCH information. Part of me wanted it to be two books ( and part of me was glad it was one). There is so much information in the book. I don't think you could take any information out. The chapters are long. Again, I don't know if it would have worked if they were shorter

The book shows the human side to John Lewis ( and other figures). I really felt I got to know him reading this book. It doesn't make anyone perfect. We all are human.

I think this book should be a required reading for an American history ( college) class. I do hope a movie is made from this book ( even though I know it will have to leave a lot out).

I am so thankful to the author for writing the book. I am so thankful I got the opportunity to read this book. I would really like to see the author on a book tour.

Summary: How do you summarize a life like John Lewis’?

I am not new to the story of John Lewis, but this was the first full-length biography I have read about John Lewis. I have previously read the graphic novels (The March Trilogy and Run) and the short biography by Jon Meacham, as well as watching the documentary Good Trouble. And Lewis figures prominently in many biographies, memoirs, and Civil Rights era histories. But I had not read a full-length biography.

David Greenberg has previously written biographies of Nixon and Coolidge and two books about the presidency. This is a biography that used hundreds of interviews and personal papers. And I think perhaps most interesting to me is that the biography was only half finished when Lewis was ousted from SNCC. The main difference is that everything I have previously watched or read primarily focused on Lewis’ early civil rights work prior to leaving SNCC.

“Lews found himself, at age 26, with no job, unmarried and unsure what to do with his life. The movement to which he had devoted his adult life was veering away from the ideals that had animated it. To remain in the struggle, he would have to find another path.”
Part of what has always previously struck me about Lewis was how young he was when he was thrust into leadership. He was a leader of the Nashville Student Movement before he was 20. He was one of the speakers at the 1963 March on Washington when he was 23. Stokley Carmichael replaced him as chairman of SNCC when Lewis was 26. Everything I had previously read about Lewis was how his orientation toward a belief in nonviolence as a principle, not just a strategy paired with his maturity as a young man. He was not inclined to date or drink or parties, but he did draw people to him.

That early fame did not just lead to an easy later life. He successfully led the Voter Education Project for seven years. Under his leadership, VEP registered more than 4 million people. He also served for short periods for a foundation and then in the Carter administration supervising the VISTA program. Eventually, he moved back to Atlanta after a time in New York and Washington DC.

A bit over two years after leaving SNCC Lewis married Lillian Miles. Lillian was a librarian and an important figure in his later life. But they spent significant time apart. Lewis was used to traveling with his work for SNCC and continued to travel for his various jobs. In 1977, Lewis first ran for Congress but lost the primary. Over the next year, there were many changes. He had resigned from the VEP to run for Congress. The couple had adopted a son in May 1976. In June, he was offered a job as Associate Director for ACTION, an umbrella agency that included Peace Corps, VISTA, and other programs. In July he was confirmed by the Senate. Lillian and their son did not move to Washington DC with him.

Lewis did not agree with Carter on many issues and resigned before the end of Carter’s term and ran for Atlanta city council. The city council job was officially part-time with part-time pay. And they lived mostly on Lillian’s salary as a librarian. Lewis served in the city council for seven years, primarily acting as a conscious against corruption and against development projects that would break apart communities. This included opposition to the original plans for the Carter Center.

In 1986, Lewis again ran for the 5th Congressional District, this time against Julian Bond, one of his friends from SNCC days. That was a brutal campaign, one that split the friends for the rest of their lives. But Lewis won and served the rest of his life in Congress rising to senior leadership within the Democratic delegation.

Part of what I appreciate is that while Lewis is honored in the book, he is not lionized inappropriately. He had weaknesses. He maintained his position as conscious of Congress, he took difficult stands, and not all of them were wise stands looking back on history. He had weaknesses as a leader and manager. But he was not prone to some of the ways that leadership, power, and money tend to become a problem for many. He was still largely an everyman, even as his fame grew in later years.

The March Trilogy and earlier books that he worked on (usually with a secondary author who primarily did the writing) increased his fame. Because so many civil rights era figures passed away young, either from violence or health issues that were often impacted by stress and violence, Lewis became not just a figure of history for the civil rights movement, but also a visible symbol of the movement. Lewis’ work to commemorate the Selma March, including bringing annual delegations from Congress to the march, and his work to get the African American History Museum approved and built were some of the most significant work he did while in Congress. Lewis used his history to remind Congress and the country of the struggle for equality that was not so long ago.

I think the most significant weakness of the book was a lack of attention to his faith and the way it shaped his life and thinking. Greenberg does not ignore Lewis’ faith, but it isn’t a significant theme of the book. I think Lewis would be a good subject for Eerdman’s Library of Religious Biography series.

Puffery of a Civil Rights Activist Who Became a Career Politician
John Robert Lewis (1940-2020) served in the US House of Representatives for Georgia between 1987-2020. He held some type of political office between 1963-2020, or since he was 23, so he is an example of an early barrier-breaker.
The biography explains that back on July 15, 1962, Lewis “had to limit his Selma speech to then minutes”, because he had to then travel to Maryland to handle an ongoing riot that had the National Guard called against it (148). Then, there were agitations in Selma itself (169). In one incident in September, Lewis was marching behind a sign for, “One Man, One Vote”, when the sheriff focused on his group, before “Lewis fled” the threat of arrest. “He evaded the weapons, but was forced with others onto a bus and driven to jail.” There was press coverage, as Lewis sat in jail on Freedom Day (169). He was freed and carried on with other protests. The incident where he failed to avoid a beating in Selma occurred a bit later, in 1965, during another voting rights campaign. The Alabama State Troopers ordered them to disperse, and they instead stopped to pray, so the police release tear gas and attacked them with nightsticks, causing Lewis’ injuries (225).
I was curious how Lewis began to be elected to public office, so I searched for the term “elected”. An early mention is that he protested his failure to become the “rightfully elected chairman” of the SNCC. So he “felt betrayed and hurt”. Lewis attempted to leave the SNCC with his friends afterwards, or to pressure a “revote” in response to “a non-democratic ploy” (267). He seems to have gone as far as to threaten “the death of SNCC, of the movement”, but refrained from taking it this far (269). Lewis spent the following years actively designing “educational programs to help newly elected” black “officials”, and generally helping blacks to win public offices (323). There are some philosophical questions if “an elected official’s color” should “matter more than his positions” (334). There is a brief description of Lewis on the campaign trail, and broad promises, and some specifics, such as that he observed during his campaign, “peddlers of drugs and hot stolen merchandise” and hoped that the community could influence these hooligans by making them “embarrassed” of this criminality. This type of rhetoric succeeded in winning for Lewis “a slew of endorsements, including from the Constitution, and coasted to victory with 69 percent of the vote” (368), and he was off and running in his following non-stop political career.
There are too many abstract claims made in this biography without clear citations of their sources. And too much is unexplained. Just what is the relationship between Lewis creating a platform to support black politicians, and this platform being used specifically to help his own very early-starting career reach such meteoric success? Why was he threatening to overthrow the movement, if he was not granted power over it? Are these moral decisions? This book seems to be a puffery of Lewis that does not consider implied negatives. Despite these problems, it is important to document biographies of recent American political figures. Figuring out if they did something wrong, or right begins with a record of just what it is that they did. Most of the sources cited in the notes are newspaper articles, with a smaller percentage of interviews with associates. A successful politician is likely to have been manipulating what the press reported about them, as apparent from his endorsement by the Constitution at the defining early stage. Thus, it would have been a fairer biography if somebody other than these publicity-feeding or associate-driven sources had been consulted to check how the opposition perceived Lewis. There are no saintly white politicians, so it is suspicious when a book presents a saintly black politician. Then again, it is an incredible narrative of success despite the odds, and of a struggle for rights. And such stories are especially needed today: even if they are skewed towards the victory of justice, when in truth justice has mostly been losing.
--Pennsylvania Literary Journal, Summer 2024 issue

Greenberg has told the personal history of one of the legendary civil rights movement figures. I expected the book to focus solely on the years of his activity in the movement, but the book was so much more than that. More than illuminating the civil rights movement through Lewis' life, Greenberg helps readers to understand the commitment, passion, and spiritual strength that one man can have to a cause greater than himself.

From a young age, Lewis developed a sense of dedication and determination. This included his time in Nashville as a student. Greenberg implicitly argues (some times less implicitly than others, however) that Lewis saw this work not just as a political endeavor but a higher calling to help others. His awareness was clearly more substantial than others his age, even many who worked alongside him. From the sit-ins forward, Lewis held a courageous attitude that guided him all the way through his career in the Senate. This leadership was shaped and molded by his influential roles in SNCC and the Freedom Rides.

The book puts Lewis in a human light, showing his tenacity but also places where he was ambivalent or more cautious (especially in 1963).

Part II focuses on his life in politics, one that I'm guessing, more readers know less about. The traits he developed early on affected his later work, for instance in the VEP by showing a commitment to voting and democracy at large. It could be argued that Lewis developed a passion for doing the right thing when it may not have been popular. This was especially true with his tussles with Bond or during the Clinton presidency, even applied during the foreign policy work at the end of the Cold War. Not only did Lewis speak truth to power but he spoke truth to frustrations.

Greenberg's book is an insightful work that serves as mortar to fill in the gaps between our understanding of a major civil rights icon and his life of applying his philosophy of justice

Thank you Simon & Shuster for providing this book for review consideration via NetGalley. All opinions are my own.

I just finished John Lewis, by David Greenberg.

The book does an excellent job tracing Lewis’s entire career. The author had access to Lewis, as well interviewing about 250 people who knew him. Greenberg also obtained valuable FBI files and documents while researching this book. It is an extremely thorough look at Lewis’s entire life.

One of the many highlights of the book was the discussion on the march on Washington in 1963. There was plenty of good information on what was going on behind the scenes and of all of the preparations. Lewis was the youngest speaker at the event, which of course included King’s I Had a Dream speech. The book’s treatment of the march on Montgomery, which included the infamous incident of Lewis being beaten in Selma, was also excellent.

One of the great things about history books is all of the little tidbits that one learns throughout the book. One good example from this book was the Johnson administration had invited Lewis to attend the signing ceremony for the Civil Rights Act of 1964. But, Lewis turned them down, since he was too busy with his work in Mississippi, as part of the Freedom Summer, at the time.

The book gives good coverage of Lewis’s relationships with people such as Martin Luther King Jr., Julian Bond and Bill Clinton. And speaking of Clinton, the book’s discussion of Lewis switching his support from Hillary to Obama was another one of its very many strengths.

Prior to reading this book, I had read two of this author’s previous books. I gave each one of them A’s. But, this one outperformed the others. It got an A+, which means I have inducted it into my Hall of Fame. Goodreads and NetGalley require grades on a 1-5 star system. In my personal conversion system, an A+ equates to 5 stars. (A or A+: 5 stars, B+: 4 stars, B: 3 stars, C: 2 stars, D or F: 1 star).

After I finished this book, I also preordered the audiobook version so I will be able to enjoy it again when it is released on October 8 (same date as the print and Kindle versions).

This review has been posted at NetGalley, Goodreads and my blog, Mr. Book’s Book Reviews.