Member Reviews

I was so excited to dive into "Camelot Burning" – I mean, Arthurian legends + steampunk? Yes, please! And while I really enjoyed the takes on the story and familiar characters Kathryn Rose crafted, I often find the writing dense and clunky, which made it hard to get through this book.

I loved that Vivienne, the main character, has access to both high society as a handmaiden to Guinevere as well as to the outskirts of society as she moonlights as Merlin's apprentice, and thought that the characterization of Merlin as a recovering magic addict was a very creative and intriguing touch.

As for the romance plot, Vivienne love interest is Marcus, Lancelot's squire, and honestly, I found him very hot and cold, which made it was hard to engage with their story and root for the two of them as a couple.

Ultimately, I think "Camelot Burning" was a better concept than it was an actual book.

Was this review helpful?

I was super excited by the concept of this book and ready to dive in. I really wanted to love it, and while it was fun, something just felt off. Maybe it was that I couldn't connect to the characters well, but the plot didn't pull me in despite its attempts at being propulsive. It was still kinda fun, but nothing particularly impactful.

Was this review helpful?