Everything Flirts
Philosophical Romances
by Sharon Wahl
This title was previously available on NetGalley and is now archived.
Send NetGalley books directly to your Kindle or Kindle app
1
To read on a Kindle or Kindle app, please add kindle@netgalley.com as an approved email address to receive files in your Amazon account. Click here for step-by-step instructions.
2
Also find your Kindle email address within your Amazon account, and enter it here.
Pub Date Nov 05 2024 | Archive Date Nov 05 2024
University of Iowa Press | University Of Iowa Press
Talking about this book? Use #EverythingFlirts #NetGalley. More hashtag tips!
Description
At the heart of the stories in Everything Flirts are some of life’s trickiest questions: Why is it so hard to make the first move on a date? How do we find the person we will love? If you finally find a person to love, how do you convince them to love you back?
With a mixture of humor and reverence, Sharon Wahl hijacks classic works of philosophy and turns their focus to love. The philosopher Wittgenstein helps us consider the limits of language: Does there exist an argument, a logical deduction, that will cause another person to love us? The philosopher Zeno’s laws of motion stipulate that we can only ever cross half of any distance. This principle is applied to a first date, where making a first move becomes more and more impossible because the movie this couple goes to see is a depressing mood-killer. A woman afraid of love applies Bentham’s utilitarian principles to find her perfect match, testing every man she meets until she finds one who aces every one of her tests. Nonetheless, she wonders: Is he right for her? Is she ready to fall in love forever? The sublime and the ridiculous come together to playfully examine why love just might be a topic too hard for philosophers to explain.
Advance Praise
“Delightfully clever and philosophically complex, the stories in Everything Flirts unfold like dreams, carrying you from one poignant love affair to the next. The prose is exquisite and seductive. The characters charm and disturb. And the collection as a whole lingers with you. Like a haunting.”—Jamil Jan Kochai, judge, John Simmons Short Fiction Award
“‘Being human was sufficient camouflage,’ writes Sharon Wahl in her witty new collection Everything Flirts about a philosophical love life. ‘I Also Dated Zarathustra’ ends with the philosopher enamored with a Vegas mannequin after drinking too much ‘Will to Power’; the question of whether one should collect a cascade of packing peanuts or go to class brings on Wittgenstein; Einstein proves that nothing’s impossible, especially in love; and Bertrand Russell’s interesting for his kissing technique. Then Wahl redefines it all with autofiction. A rare and scintillating peek into the hearts of math and philosophy geeks.”—Terese Svoboda
“Here fiction and philosophy are paired like wine with cheese. . . . Wahl moves us through stages of relationships, from unrequited yearnings to breakups, creating subtle linkages and uniting the stories with her nimble, playful style. Surreal flashes of humor serve as a welcome counterpoint to the weight of Big Ideas. . . . these stories bring old concepts to new, vivacious life.”—Kirkus
Available Editions
EDITION | Other Format |
ISBN | 9781609389970 |
PRICE | $18.00 (USD) |
PAGES | 188 |
Links
Available on NetGalley
Featured Reviews
Everything Flirts by Sharon Wahl is a collection of linked stories that seem like it might be auto-fiction. Like any introspective fiction this will likely appeal very much to some readers while not at all to others. I happen to have been able to relate to a lot of the feelings and, more important for me, the manner in which the character understands and reflects on what is happening.
I want to talk a little about the "philosophical" element of the stories. I talked with a couple friends who read a few of the stories and came to the realization that those with some formal philosophy education will fall into two distinct camps. In thinking back, I realized that this was true when I was both a student and when I later taught some of these thinkers. One group generally keeps philosophy in a narrow lane, often with comments about whether a specific philosopher would or wouldn't have thought something. For these, philosophy is an academic pursuit and even though it has affected that person's way of thinking it has done so unconsciously. The person doesn't think back to what Nietzsche wrote when something comes up in life unless it can hold an almost one-to-one correspondence. The other camp often thinks about what a philosopher may have written and applies the germ of that thought to events and feelings that have no direct correspondence. The philosophy for these people become part of a toolbox for understanding their lives and the world around them. Both types made excellent students, so it isn't about "knowing" the philosophy. It is more about whether the texts and ideas are only in conversation with the tradition it responds to or whether it is alive and well in conversation with our current lived lives. I think the second type will enjoy this book far more than the first.
I actually started the book twice; I came to the first story unsure what to expect and overthought what I was reading. I put it aside for a few days then came back with my usual fiction mindset; what are the characters experiencing and how well am I understanding and relating to their lives. From that point on I thoroughly enjoyed reading this. I actually revisited some of the philosophy to help me better appreciate how the protagonist internalized the ideas. Which, of course, gave me more perspectives from which to incorporate their thought into my life.
I will caution some readers, it is counter-productive to try to decide whether Wittgenstein, for example, meant what the character took from his writing. This is a look at how his writing and thought became a part of the character's way of thinking. As such, it is less about a "proper" understanding and more about the dialogue between that philosopher and this character. You're eavesdropping, so don't sit as judge and jury, just try to understand and empathize.
Reviewed from a copy made available by the publisher via NetGalley.